Students’ peer feedback engagements in online English courses facilitated by a social network in Thailand

Q1 Social Sciences
Budi Waluyo, Benjamin Panmei
{"title":"Students’ peer feedback engagements in online English courses facilitated by a social network in Thailand","authors":"Budi Waluyo, Benjamin Panmei","doi":"10.3926/jotse.2305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the extensive research on peer feedback in recent years, there is limited understanding of how students engage in peer feedback activities within online English courses and their expectations during these activities. Hence, using a sequential explanatory mixed methods design with a phenomenological approach, this study integrated online peer feedback (OPF) activities into a 12-week online English writing course involving 30 second-year students (16.7% male, 83.3% female) facilitated by a Facebook group. Data were collected through survey questionnaires, written reflections, and task scores. Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations were used to analyze the quantitative data, while thematic analysis was employed for the qualitative data. Three findings emerged: 1) EFL students exhibited positive engagements in OPF activities, 2) Students' engagements were not significantly correlated with their writing outcomes, and 3) Students provided recommendations for improving the quality and quantity of feedback, incorporating teacher feedback and guidance, and enhancing the overall process and experience. Based on these findings, integrating OPF activities into the academic curriculum is suggested, with a focus on providing guidance to students for delivering descriptive and constructive feedback, offering scaffolding to enhance their comprehension, and writing skills, and addressing concerns related to language proficiency and grammar.","PeriodicalId":37919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Technology and Science Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Technology and Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the extensive research on peer feedback in recent years, there is limited understanding of how students engage in peer feedback activities within online English courses and their expectations during these activities. Hence, using a sequential explanatory mixed methods design with a phenomenological approach, this study integrated online peer feedback (OPF) activities into a 12-week online English writing course involving 30 second-year students (16.7% male, 83.3% female) facilitated by a Facebook group. Data were collected through survey questionnaires, written reflections, and task scores. Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations were used to analyze the quantitative data, while thematic analysis was employed for the qualitative data. Three findings emerged: 1) EFL students exhibited positive engagements in OPF activities, 2) Students' engagements were not significantly correlated with their writing outcomes, and 3) Students provided recommendations for improving the quality and quantity of feedback, incorporating teacher feedback and guidance, and enhancing the overall process and experience. Based on these findings, integrating OPF activities into the academic curriculum is suggested, with a focus on providing guidance to students for delivering descriptive and constructive feedback, offering scaffolding to enhance their comprehension, and writing skills, and addressing concerns related to language proficiency and grammar.
泰国社交网络促进的在线英语课程中学生的同伴反馈参与情况
尽管近年来对同伴反馈进行了广泛的研究,但对学生如何参与在线英语课程中的同伴反馈活动以及他们在这些活动中的期望了解有限。因此,本研究采用了现象学方法的顺序解释混合方法设计,将在线同伴反馈(OPF)活动纳入了一门为期 12 周的在线英语写作课程,该课程由 30 名二年级学生(16.7% 为男生,83.3% 为女生)参与,并由一个 Facebook 小组提供帮助。数据通过调查问卷、书面反思和任务评分收集。定量数据采用描述性统计和二元相关分析,定性数据采用主题分析。研究得出了三个结论:1)EFL 学生在 OPF 活动中表现出了积极的参与性;2)学生的参与性与他们的写作成果没有显著的相关性;3)学生为提高反馈的质量和数量、结合教师的反馈和指导以及增强整个过程和体验提出了建议。基于这些发现,建议将 OPF 活动纳入学术课程,重点是指导学生提供描述性和建设性的反馈,提供支架以提高他们的理解能力和写作技巧,并解决与语言能力和语法相关的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: JOTSE is an international Journal aiming at publishing interdisciplinary research within the university education framework and it is especially focused on the fields of Technology and Science. JOTSE serves as an international forum of reference for Engineering education. Teaching innovation oriented, the journal will be issued twice per year (every 6 months) and will include original works, research and projects dealing with the new learning methodologies and new learning supporting tools related to the wide range of disciplines the Engineering studies and profession involve. In addition, JOTSE will also issue special numbers on more technological themes from the different areas of general interest in the industrial world, which may be used as practical cases in classroom tuition and practice. Thereby, getting the working world reality closer to the learning at University. Among other areas of interest, our Journal will be focused on: 1. Education 2.General Science (Physics, Chemistry, Maths,…) 3.Telecommunications 4.Electricity and Electronics 5.Industrial Computing (Digital, Analogic, Robotics, Ergonomics) 6.Aerospatial (aircraft design and building, engines, materials) 7. Automotive (automotive materials, automobile emissions).
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信