Digital interventions for autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Tianqi Wang, Yu Ma, X. Du, Chunpei Li, Zhongbi Peng, Yi Wang, Hao Zhou
{"title":"Digital interventions for autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis","authors":"Tianqi Wang, Yu Ma, X. Du, Chunpei Li, Zhongbi Peng, Yi Wang, Hao Zhou","doi":"10.1002/ped4.12417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital technology is now widely available for the interventions of autism, but its validity and feasibility remain to be proved.This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of digital health interventions (DHIs) in improving core symptoms or intelligence quotient in patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).Three databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus, were searched on November 15, 2022. Randomized clinical trials that enrolled patients with ASD who received DHIs and a control group without DHI treatment were included. Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2) was applied to assess the risk of bias.A total of 33 studies, involving 1285 participants (658 [51.2%] in DHI groups and 627 [48.8%] in control groups), were analyzed to investigate the differences between DHI groups and control groups. Significantly greater improvements in the overall performance of ASD were observed in the DHI groups compared to the control groups (including active, waitlist, treatment‐as‐usual, and no treatment) with an effect size of 1.89 (Cohen's d 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26–2.52). Studies with treatment‐as‐usual, waitlist, and no treatment control demonstrated large effect sizes of Cohen's d 3.41 (95% CI: 0.84–5.97), Cohen's d 4.27 (95% CI: 1.95–6.59), and Cohen's d 4.52 (95% CI: 2.98–6.06) respectively. In contrast, studies with active control revealed insignificant effect sizes (Cohen's d 0.73, 95% CI: 0.12–1.33).This meta‐analysis found significantly greater improvements in core symptoms or intelligence quotient in ASD patients receiving DHIs compared to those in control conditions. ASD patients may benefit from the DHIs and reduce the economic burden.","PeriodicalId":19992,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Investigation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ped4.12417","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital technology is now widely available for the interventions of autism, but its validity and feasibility remain to be proved.This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of digital health interventions (DHIs) in improving core symptoms or intelligence quotient in patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).Three databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus, were searched on November 15, 2022. Randomized clinical trials that enrolled patients with ASD who received DHIs and a control group without DHI treatment were included. Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2) was applied to assess the risk of bias.A total of 33 studies, involving 1285 participants (658 [51.2%] in DHI groups and 627 [48.8%] in control groups), were analyzed to investigate the differences between DHI groups and control groups. Significantly greater improvements in the overall performance of ASD were observed in the DHI groups compared to the control groups (including active, waitlist, treatment‐as‐usual, and no treatment) with an effect size of 1.89 (Cohen's d 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26–2.52). Studies with treatment‐as‐usual, waitlist, and no treatment control demonstrated large effect sizes of Cohen's d 3.41 (95% CI: 0.84–5.97), Cohen's d 4.27 (95% CI: 1.95–6.59), and Cohen's d 4.52 (95% CI: 2.98–6.06) respectively. In contrast, studies with active control revealed insignificant effect sizes (Cohen's d 0.73, 95% CI: 0.12–1.33).This meta‐analysis found significantly greater improvements in core symptoms or intelligence quotient in ASD patients receiving DHIs compared to those in control conditions. ASD patients may benefit from the DHIs and reduce the economic burden.
自闭症谱系障碍的数字化干预:系统回顾和荟萃分析
本研究旨在调查数字健康干预(DHIs)在改善自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者核心症状或智商方面的有效性。研究人员于2022年11月15日检索了PubMed、Cochrane和Scopus等三个数据库。纳入的随机临床试验包括接受 DHIs 治疗的 ASD 患者和未接受 DHI 治疗的对照组。共分析了33项研究,涉及1285名参与者(658名[51.2%]在DHI组,627名[48.8%]在对照组),以调查DHI组与对照组之间的差异。与对照组(包括积极治疗组、候补治疗组、照常治疗组和不治疗组)相比,DHI 组在 ASD 整体表现方面有显著改善,效应大小为 1.89(Cohen's d 95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.26-2.52)。采用 "照常治疗"、"候补治疗 "和 "无治疗 "对照的研究显示了较大的效应量,分别为 Cohen's d 3.41 (95% CI: 0.84-5.97)、Cohen's d 4.27 (95% CI: 1.95-6.59)和 Cohen's d 4.52 (95% CI: 2.98-6.06)。这项荟萃分析发现,与对照组相比,接受 DHIs 治疗的 ASD 患者的核心症状或智商有明显改善。自闭症患者可从定向行走引导器中获益,并减轻经济负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Investigation
Pediatric Investigation Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信