An integrated framework for techno-enviro-economic assessment in nanogrids

Ahmad El Sayed, Gokturk Poyrazoglu, Eihab E. E. Ahmed
{"title":"An integrated framework for techno-enviro-economic assessment in nanogrids","authors":"Ahmad El Sayed, Gokturk Poyrazoglu, Eihab E. E. Ahmed","doi":"10.61435/ijred.2024.60001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an integrated framework designed for capacity planning of grid-connected nanogrid, a small solar and energy storage system that can provide kilowatt-level services to individual buildings. This framework comprehensively evaluates nanogrid cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and reliability, employing a multi-faceted techno-enviro-economic assessment approach. Traditional nanogrid capacity planning often prioritizes peak load requirements, which may lack optimality owing to occasional peak load occurrences. Conversely, optimizing solely for base load requirements might also fall short of effectiveness, compromising reliability and sustainability objectives. The proposed framework employs a three-step, integrated process for nanogrid (NG) capacity planning. Firstly, the Planner module identifies optimal asset sizing considering a two-day look-ahead logic. Then, the Operator module serves as a digital twin for the system, conducting hourly calculations over a short-term horizon. Lastly, the Evaluator module evaluates technical, environmental, and economic metrics for each solution, assessing the effectiveness of asset-sizing decisions. A simulated case study has demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed framework. The technical assessment revealed that a PV size of 24 kW and a storage capacity of 91 kWh led to the most reliable solution, with a probability of local sufficiency of 95 percent. Furthermore, the environmental assessment showcased a renewable fraction of 94% with a PV size of 26 kW and a storage of 85 kWh. Economically, the analysis identified that a PV size of 12 kW and a storage size of 24 kWh led to the minimum total cost. In contrast, a PV size of 26 kW and a storage size of 85 kWh yielded a total operating savings of $4,801.","PeriodicalId":14200,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Renewable Energy Development","volume":"42 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Renewable Energy Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61435/ijred.2024.60001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents an integrated framework designed for capacity planning of grid-connected nanogrid, a small solar and energy storage system that can provide kilowatt-level services to individual buildings. This framework comprehensively evaluates nanogrid cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and reliability, employing a multi-faceted techno-enviro-economic assessment approach. Traditional nanogrid capacity planning often prioritizes peak load requirements, which may lack optimality owing to occasional peak load occurrences. Conversely, optimizing solely for base load requirements might also fall short of effectiveness, compromising reliability and sustainability objectives. The proposed framework employs a three-step, integrated process for nanogrid (NG) capacity planning. Firstly, the Planner module identifies optimal asset sizing considering a two-day look-ahead logic. Then, the Operator module serves as a digital twin for the system, conducting hourly calculations over a short-term horizon. Lastly, the Evaluator module evaluates technical, environmental, and economic metrics for each solution, assessing the effectiveness of asset-sizing decisions. A simulated case study has demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed framework. The technical assessment revealed that a PV size of 24 kW and a storage capacity of 91 kWh led to the most reliable solution, with a probability of local sufficiency of 95 percent. Furthermore, the environmental assessment showcased a renewable fraction of 94% with a PV size of 26 kW and a storage of 85 kWh. Economically, the analysis identified that a PV size of 12 kW and a storage size of 24 kWh led to the minimum total cost. In contrast, a PV size of 26 kW and a storage size of 85 kWh yielded a total operating savings of $4,801.
纳米网格技术-环境-经济评估综合框架
纳米电网是一种小型太阳能和储能系统,可为单个建筑物提供千瓦级服务。该框架采用多方面的技术-环境-经济评估方法,全面评估了纳米电网的成本效益、可持续性和可靠性。传统的纳米电网容量规划通常优先考虑峰值负荷需求,但由于峰值负荷偶尔出现,这种规划可能缺乏优化性。反之,仅针对基本负荷需求进行优化也可能达不到效果,损害可靠性和可持续性目标。所提出的框架采用了三步综合流程来进行纳米电网(NG)容量规划。首先,"规划者 "模块根据两天前瞻逻辑确定最佳资产规模。然后,操作员模块作为系统的数字双胞胎,在短期范围内进行每小时计算。最后,评估模块对每个解决方案的技术、环境和经济指标进行评估,评估资产规模决策的有效性。一项模拟案例研究证明了拟议框架的有效性。技术评估显示,光伏发电规模为 24 千瓦,存储容量为 91 千瓦时,是最可靠的解决方案,本地充足的概率为 95%。此外,环境评估显示,光伏发电规模为 26 千瓦、蓄电量为 85 千瓦时时,可再生能源比例为 94%。从经济角度分析,12 千瓦的光伏发电规模和 24 千瓦时的储能规模使总成本最低。相比之下,26 千瓦的光伏发电规模和 85 千瓦时的储能规模共节省运营成本 4801 美元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信