{"title":"Mapping Actionable Gaps in Patient Journey for Depression in the United Arab\nEmirates: A Strategic Framework","authors":"Samer Makhoul, Osama Ali, Nahida Nayaz Ahmed, Urooj Siddiqui, Amina Cherchali","doi":"10.2174/0102506882271385240119144550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nDepression is on a steady rise across the United Arab Emirates (UAE), causing much socio-economic burden to the country. Identifying patient\njourney gaps for depression, beginning with awareness and screening, diagnosis, and treatment to sustained remission and rehabilitation, can help\ndesign health policies with actionable solutions, mitigating the burden of the disease.\n\n\n\nStudies in the English language between 2010 and 2021 were shortlisted using a structured search in electronic databases followed by an\nunstructured search using government websites and Google Scholar and anecdotal data from local professional experts. Synthesized data was\nsubjected to weighted mean calculation, and an evidence gap map was charted.\n\n\n\nVarying prevalence of depression (5.1%–82.2%) was reported across different settings and population sample sizes in the UAE. One study\nreported that 13.0% of the UAE population was aware of their depressive condition. Screening rates of depression were reported to be relatively\nhigh (34.2%–90.5%), while depression was diagnosed in 0.5%–48.5% of patients. The treatment rate was 36.1%, while adherence rates were\nestimated to be low at 0.3%. No evidence of control or remission of depression could be gathered.\nThe reviewed studies used only the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) diagnostic criteria for diagnosing depression.\nThe review also lacked large-scale research studies that may have limited the actual representation of the prevalence of depression across the\ncountry.\n\n\n\nAddressing the gaps identified through evidence mapping methodology can shape a ‘model of care’ for depression. This model should aim to\nharmonize collaborations among the mental health stakeholders and advocate for the social reintegration of patients.\n","PeriodicalId":508641,"journal":{"name":"New Emirates Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Emirates Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0102506882271385240119144550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Depression is on a steady rise across the United Arab Emirates (UAE), causing much socio-economic burden to the country. Identifying patient
journey gaps for depression, beginning with awareness and screening, diagnosis, and treatment to sustained remission and rehabilitation, can help
design health policies with actionable solutions, mitigating the burden of the disease.
Studies in the English language between 2010 and 2021 were shortlisted using a structured search in electronic databases followed by an
unstructured search using government websites and Google Scholar and anecdotal data from local professional experts. Synthesized data was
subjected to weighted mean calculation, and an evidence gap map was charted.
Varying prevalence of depression (5.1%–82.2%) was reported across different settings and population sample sizes in the UAE. One study
reported that 13.0% of the UAE population was aware of their depressive condition. Screening rates of depression were reported to be relatively
high (34.2%–90.5%), while depression was diagnosed in 0.5%–48.5% of patients. The treatment rate was 36.1%, while adherence rates were
estimated to be low at 0.3%. No evidence of control or remission of depression could be gathered.
The reviewed studies used only the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) diagnostic criteria for diagnosing depression.
The review also lacked large-scale research studies that may have limited the actual representation of the prevalence of depression across the
country.
Addressing the gaps identified through evidence mapping methodology can shape a ‘model of care’ for depression. This model should aim to
harmonize collaborations among the mental health stakeholders and advocate for the social reintegration of patients.