The Impact of Sentinel-1-Corrected Fractal Roughness on Soil Moisture Retrievals

Ju Hyoung Lee, Hyun-Cheol Kim
{"title":"The Impact of Sentinel-1-Corrected Fractal Roughness on Soil Moisture Retrievals","authors":"Ju Hyoung Lee, Hyun-Cheol Kim","doi":"10.3390/fractalfract8030137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fractals are widely recognized as one of the best geometric models to depict soil roughness on various scales from tillage to micro-topography smaller than radar wavelength. However, most fractal approaches require an additional geometric description of experimental sites to be analysed by existing radiative transfer models. For example, fractal dimension or spectral parameter is often related to root-mean-square (RMS) height to be characterized as the microwave surface. However, field measurements hardly represent multi-scale roughness. In this study, we rescaled Power Spectral Density with Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)-inverted rms height, and estimated non-stationary fractal roughness to accommodate multi-scale roughness into a radiative transfer model structure. As a result, soil moisture was retrieved over the Yanco site in Australia. Local validation shows that the Integral Equation Model (IEM) poorly simulated backscatters using inverted roughness as compared to fractal roughness even in anisotropic conditions. This is considered due to a violation of time-invariance assumption used for inversion. Spatial analysis also shows that multi-scale fractal roughness better illustrated the hydrologically reasonable backscattering partitioning, as compared to inverted roughness. Fractal roughness showed a greater contribution of roughness to backscattering in dry conditions. Differences between IEM backscattering and measurement were lower, even when the isotropic assumption of the fractal model was violated. In wet conditions, the contribution of soil moisture to backscattering was shown more clearly by fractal roughness. These results suggest that the multi-scale fractal roughness can be better adapted to the IEM even in anisotropic conditions than the inversion to assume time-invariance of roughness.","PeriodicalId":510138,"journal":{"name":"Fractal and Fractional","volume":"51 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fractal and Fractional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8030137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fractals are widely recognized as one of the best geometric models to depict soil roughness on various scales from tillage to micro-topography smaller than radar wavelength. However, most fractal approaches require an additional geometric description of experimental sites to be analysed by existing radiative transfer models. For example, fractal dimension or spectral parameter is often related to root-mean-square (RMS) height to be characterized as the microwave surface. However, field measurements hardly represent multi-scale roughness. In this study, we rescaled Power Spectral Density with Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)-inverted rms height, and estimated non-stationary fractal roughness to accommodate multi-scale roughness into a radiative transfer model structure. As a result, soil moisture was retrieved over the Yanco site in Australia. Local validation shows that the Integral Equation Model (IEM) poorly simulated backscatters using inverted roughness as compared to fractal roughness even in anisotropic conditions. This is considered due to a violation of time-invariance assumption used for inversion. Spatial analysis also shows that multi-scale fractal roughness better illustrated the hydrologically reasonable backscattering partitioning, as compared to inverted roughness. Fractal roughness showed a greater contribution of roughness to backscattering in dry conditions. Differences between IEM backscattering and measurement were lower, even when the isotropic assumption of the fractal model was violated. In wet conditions, the contribution of soil moisture to backscattering was shown more clearly by fractal roughness. These results suggest that the multi-scale fractal roughness can be better adapted to the IEM even in anisotropic conditions than the inversion to assume time-invariance of roughness.
哨兵 1 号校正分形粗糙度对土壤水分检索的影响
分形被公认为是描述从耕作到小于雷达波长的微地形等各种尺度的土壤粗糙度的最佳几何模型之一。然而,大多数分形方法都需要对实验点进行额外的几何描述,以便用现有的辐射传输模型进行分析。例如,分形维度或光谱参数通常与均方根(RMS)高度相关,以作为微波表面的特征。然而,实地测量很难体现多尺度粗糙度。在本研究中,我们用合成孔径雷达(SAR)反向均方根高度重新标定了功率谱密度,并估算了非稳态分形粗糙度,以便将多尺度粗糙度纳入辐射传递模型结构。因此,对澳大利亚延科站点的土壤水分进行了检索。局部验证结果表明,与分形粗糙度相比,使用倒置粗糙度的积分方程模型(IEM)即使在各向异性条件下对后向散射的模拟效果也很差。这被认为是由于违反了反演所用的时间不变性假设。空间分析还表明,与反演粗糙度相比,多尺度分形粗糙度能更好地说明水文上合理的反向散射分区。分形粗糙度显示,在干燥条件下,粗糙度对反向散射的贡献更大。即使违反了分形模型的各向同性假设,IEM 后向散射与测量值之间的差异也较小。在潮湿条件下,土壤湿度对反向散射的影响在分形粗糙度上表现得更为明显。这些结果表明,即使在各向异性条件下,多尺度分形粗糙度也能比假设粗糙度时变的反演更好地适应 IEM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信