Do Democracy and Government Capacity Positively Contribute to Technological Innovation?

Hwan-Ju Seo, Young-Soo Lee, Jong-Il Choe
{"title":"Do Democracy and Government Capacity Positively Contribute to Technological Innovation?","authors":"Hwan-Ju Seo, Young-Soo Lee, Jong-Il Choe","doi":"10.46396/kjem..102.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: In this study, we analyze the f ollowing two points based on these existing studies. F irst, we examine the c orrelation between democracy and technological innovation, using cross-national data.We examine whether more democratized countries have an advantage over less democratic c ountries in t erms o f technological i nnovation, and whether d emocratic countries have an advantage over non-democratic countries in terms of innovation performance. we examine how government capabilities affect technological innovation by dividing them into democratic and non-democratic countries. We aim to analyze whether government capacity is important for technological innovation not only in democratic countries but also in non-democratic countries. \nResearch design, data, and methodology: This paper analyzed how political systems, especially democracy and government capacity, affect technological innovation for the period 1997-2017 in 101 countries using data extracted from the World Bank’s World Development Indicators. The relationship between political systems and technological innovation was examined using the Negative Binomial Regression Model (NBRM), which is commonly used to analyze count data with the characteristic of over-dispersion. \nResults: The findings indicate that as democratization progresses, there is a corresponding increase in innovation performance. Additionally, democratic nations demonstrate higher levels of innovation compared to non-democratic countries. Furthermore, the research reveals that countries with robust government capacity, as measured by factors such as the effectiveness of public officials, provision of public services, regulation and support of the private sector, and corruption control, tend to achieve superior innovation performance. \nImplications: These f indings support t he a rgument put forth b y Acemoglu a nd R obinson, s uggesting that i n order to a ttain s ustained economic development and innovation, countries require a certain level of government capacity associated with the operation of exploitative economic institutions. The escalating power struggle between the United States and China has now evolved into a technological competition between market democracies and s tate capitalism. Consequently, there i s a f ervent debate regarding which political systems and forms of capitalism have a positive influence on innovation. This study is expected to offer valuable insights and serve as a crucial reference point for this ongoing discourse.","PeriodicalId":300861,"journal":{"name":"The Korean-Japanese Economic and Management Association","volume":"103 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean-Japanese Economic and Management Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46396/kjem..102.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, we analyze the f ollowing two points based on these existing studies. F irst, we examine the c orrelation between democracy and technological innovation, using cross-national data.We examine whether more democratized countries have an advantage over less democratic c ountries in t erms o f technological i nnovation, and whether d emocratic countries have an advantage over non-democratic countries in terms of innovation performance. we examine how government capabilities affect technological innovation by dividing them into democratic and non-democratic countries. We aim to analyze whether government capacity is important for technological innovation not only in democratic countries but also in non-democratic countries. Research design, data, and methodology: This paper analyzed how political systems, especially democracy and government capacity, affect technological innovation for the period 1997-2017 in 101 countries using data extracted from the World Bank’s World Development Indicators. The relationship between political systems and technological innovation was examined using the Negative Binomial Regression Model (NBRM), which is commonly used to analyze count data with the characteristic of over-dispersion. Results: The findings indicate that as democratization progresses, there is a corresponding increase in innovation performance. Additionally, democratic nations demonstrate higher levels of innovation compared to non-democratic countries. Furthermore, the research reveals that countries with robust government capacity, as measured by factors such as the effectiveness of public officials, provision of public services, regulation and support of the private sector, and corruption control, tend to achieve superior innovation performance. Implications: These f indings support t he a rgument put forth b y Acemoglu a nd R obinson, s uggesting that i n order to a ttain s ustained economic development and innovation, countries require a certain level of government capacity associated with the operation of exploitative economic institutions. The escalating power struggle between the United States and China has now evolved into a technological competition between market democracies and s tate capitalism. Consequently, there i s a f ervent debate regarding which political systems and forms of capitalism have a positive influence on innovation. This study is expected to offer valuable insights and serve as a crucial reference point for this ongoing discourse.
民主和政府能力对技术创新有积极作用吗?
目的:在本研究中,我们基于这些现有研究分析了以下两点。首先,我们利用跨国数据研究了民主与技术创新之间的关系。我们研究了民主化程度较高的国家是否比民主化程度较低的国家在技术创新方面更具优势,民主国家是否比非民主国家在创新绩效方面更具优势。我们旨在分析政府能力是否不仅对民主国家的技术创新具有重要意义,而且对非民主国家的技术创新也具有重要意义。研究设计、数据和方法:本文使用从世界银行世界发展指标中提取的数据,分析了 1997-2017 年间 101 个国家的政治制度(尤其是民主和政府能力)如何影响技术创新。本文使用负二项回归模型(NBRM)研究了政治制度与技术创新之间的关系,该模型常用于分析具有过度分散特征的计数数据。研究结果研究结果表明,随着民主化进程的推进,创新绩效也会相应提高。此外,与非民主国家相比,民主国家的创新水平更高。此外,研究还显示,政府能力强的国家往往会取得优异的创新绩效,衡量政府能力的因素包括公职人员的效率、公共服务的提供、对私营部门的监管和支持以及腐败控制。影响:这些结论支持了阿斯莫格鲁和罗宾逊提出的论点,即为了实现持续的经济发展和创新,各国需要一定水平的与剥削性经济体制运作相关的政府能力。中美之间不断升级的权力斗争现已演变为市场民主与国家资本主义之间的技术竞争。因此,关于哪种政治制度和资本主义形式会对创新产生积极影响的争论十分激烈。本研究有望为这一持续的讨论提供有价值的见解和重要的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信