Graduates Are Failing in the Examination: An Ethical Investigation on the Experiences of Board Licensure Examination for Professional Teachers (BLEPT) Takers

Mark Mauris Cabahug, Saudi Marie A Bonghanoy, Jhun Tubog Jr., Analie B Asingua, Qingye Chen, Claudine S Tul-id
{"title":"Graduates Are Failing in the Examination: An Ethical Investigation on the Experiences of Board Licensure Examination for Professional Teachers (BLEPT) Takers","authors":"Mark Mauris Cabahug, Saudi Marie A Bonghanoy, Jhun Tubog Jr., Analie B Asingua, Qingye Chen, Claudine S Tul-id","doi":"10.54536/ajmri.v3i2.2514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This qualitative study aimed to explore the experiences of graduate students from Bohol Island State University, focusing on those who graduated with Bachelor of Technology and Livelihood Education degree. The research utilized semi-structured interviews with 10 participants who graduated between 2018 and 2022 and did not pass the Board Licensure Examination for Professional Teachers (BLEPT). Employing snowball sampling due to the challenge of reaching recent non-passers, the study delved into the narratives of individuals facing licensure challenges. Thematic analysis of interview data revealed patterns within participants’ experiences. The open narrative approach provided a platform for participants to articulate their unique stories, facilitating a rich understanding of the complex phenomena surrounding board examination outcomes. Ethical considerations were prioritized, ensuring informed consent, confidentiality, and a registered psychologist’s validation of the interview guide. The findings revealed the following themes as reasons for failing the board examination; absence of concentration on key topics, study habits, socio-economic factors, psychological factors, inadequate institutional support, lack of academic preparation contributing to examination difficulties. The study emphasizes the need for collaborative efforts among educational institutions and stakeholders to address these challenges comprehensively, fostering an environment conducive to graduates’ success in professional licensure examinations.","PeriodicalId":244174,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation","volume":"271 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v3i2.2514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This qualitative study aimed to explore the experiences of graduate students from Bohol Island State University, focusing on those who graduated with Bachelor of Technology and Livelihood Education degree. The research utilized semi-structured interviews with 10 participants who graduated between 2018 and 2022 and did not pass the Board Licensure Examination for Professional Teachers (BLEPT). Employing snowball sampling due to the challenge of reaching recent non-passers, the study delved into the narratives of individuals facing licensure challenges. Thematic analysis of interview data revealed patterns within participants’ experiences. The open narrative approach provided a platform for participants to articulate their unique stories, facilitating a rich understanding of the complex phenomena surrounding board examination outcomes. Ethical considerations were prioritized, ensuring informed consent, confidentiality, and a registered psychologist’s validation of the interview guide. The findings revealed the following themes as reasons for failing the board examination; absence of concentration on key topics, study habits, socio-economic factors, psychological factors, inadequate institutional support, lack of academic preparation contributing to examination difficulties. The study emphasizes the need for collaborative efforts among educational institutions and stakeholders to address these challenges comprehensively, fostering an environment conducive to graduates’ success in professional licensure examinations.
毕业生考试不及格:关于专业教师资格考试(BLEPT)应试者经历的伦理调查
本定性研究旨在探讨保和岛州立大学研究生的经历,重点关注那些毕业于技术与生计教育学士学位的学生。研究采用半结构化访谈的方式,采访了 10 名在 2018 年至 2022 年期间毕业、未通过专业教师执业资格考试(BLEPT)的参与者。由于很难接触到近期未通过考试的学生,本研究采用了滚雪球式抽样,深入探讨了面临执照挑战的个人的叙述。对访谈数据的主题分析揭示了参与者的经历模式。开放式叙事方法为参与者提供了一个阐述其独特故事的平台,促进了对围绕执业资格考试结果的复杂现象的丰富理解。伦理方面的考虑被放在了首位,确保了知情同意、保密以及注册心理学家对访谈指南的确认。研究结果表明,以下主题是学生未能通过执业医师考试的原因:没有集中精力学习关键题目、学习习惯、社会经济因素、心理因素、院校支持不足、缺乏学术准备导致考试困难。研究强调,教育机构和利益相关者需要共同努力,全面应对这些挑战,营造一个有利于毕业生在专业执照考试中取得成功的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信