The Effect of Knee Tuck Jump and Jump-To-Box Plyometric Training on Female Students’ Leg Muscle Strength and Flexibility in Volleyball Extracurricular Activity

Cerika Rismayanthi, Nur Alfitra Salam, Abdul Alim, Yulvia Miftachurochmah
{"title":"The Effect of Knee Tuck Jump and Jump-To-Box Plyometric Training on Female Students’ Leg Muscle Strength and Flexibility in Volleyball Extracurricular Activity","authors":"Cerika Rismayanthi, Nur Alfitra Salam, Abdul Alim, Yulvia Miftachurochmah","doi":"10.17309/tmfv.2024.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study purpose. This study aimed to investigate the effects of Knee Tuck Jump or Jump to Box plyometric training and to determine their effectiveness in increasing leg muscle strength and flexibility in female students participating in volleyball extracurriculars.\nMaterials and methods. This study used a quasi-experimental design. Twenty-four female students were randomly selected as samples and then divided into two categories: 12 students receiving Knee Tuck Jump training (age: 17.08±0.51) and 12 students receiving Jump to Box training (age: 17.00±0.60). All participants performed the initial and final tests using the Vertical Jump and sit-and-reach tests. To analyze the data, the t-test was used to determine the differences in variables between the pretest and posttest in the experimental group.\nResults. In the Knee Tuck Jump group, a significant improvement in VJ (P=0.000) and sit-&-reach tests (P=0.000) was observed. In addition, Knee Tuck Jump was considered to be more effective in increasing the students’ flexibility, because the t value of sit-&-reach test (14.075) was higher than that of VJ (13.811).\nSimilarly, the Jump to Box group also showed a significant improvement in VJ (P=0.000) and sit-&-reach (P=0.000) tests. However, Jump to Box was deemed to be more effective in increasing the students’ leg muscle strength, as the t value of VJ (26.086) was higher than that of sit-&-reach test (9.594).\nConclusions. Based on the research findings, it can be concluded that plyometric exercises, specifically KTJ and JB, have a significant and positive impact on the lower limb muscle strength and flexibility in female students participating in volleyball extracurricular activities. Despite both demonstrating significant positive effects, KTJ training is more effective in improving flexibility compared to JB, while JB is more effective in enhancing lower limb muscle strength compared to KTJ.","PeriodicalId":178000,"journal":{"name":"Physical Education Theory and Methodology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Education Theory and Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2024.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study purpose. This study aimed to investigate the effects of Knee Tuck Jump or Jump to Box plyometric training and to determine their effectiveness in increasing leg muscle strength and flexibility in female students participating in volleyball extracurriculars. Materials and methods. This study used a quasi-experimental design. Twenty-four female students were randomly selected as samples and then divided into two categories: 12 students receiving Knee Tuck Jump training (age: 17.08±0.51) and 12 students receiving Jump to Box training (age: 17.00±0.60). All participants performed the initial and final tests using the Vertical Jump and sit-and-reach tests. To analyze the data, the t-test was used to determine the differences in variables between the pretest and posttest in the experimental group. Results. In the Knee Tuck Jump group, a significant improvement in VJ (P=0.000) and sit-&-reach tests (P=0.000) was observed. In addition, Knee Tuck Jump was considered to be more effective in increasing the students’ flexibility, because the t value of sit-&-reach test (14.075) was higher than that of VJ (13.811). Similarly, the Jump to Box group also showed a significant improvement in VJ (P=0.000) and sit-&-reach (P=0.000) tests. However, Jump to Box was deemed to be more effective in increasing the students’ leg muscle strength, as the t value of VJ (26.086) was higher than that of sit-&-reach test (9.594). Conclusions. Based on the research findings, it can be concluded that plyometric exercises, specifically KTJ and JB, have a significant and positive impact on the lower limb muscle strength and flexibility in female students participating in volleyball extracurricular activities. Despite both demonstrating significant positive effects, KTJ training is more effective in improving flexibility compared to JB, while JB is more effective in enhancing lower limb muscle strength compared to KTJ.
膝关节屈伸跳和跳箱等重力训练对排球课外活动中女学生腿部肌肉力量和柔韧性的影响
研究目的本研究旨在调查膝部屈膝跳或跳箱负重训练的效果,并确定其对参加排球课外活动的女学生增加腿部肌肉力量和柔韧性的有效性。本研究采用准实验设计。随机抽取 24 名女学生作为样本,然后将其分为两类:12名学生接受膝盖内收跳训练(年龄:17.08±0.51),12名学生接受跳箱训练(年龄:17.00±0.60)。所有参与者都进行了立定跳远和坐位体前屈的初始和最终测试。在分析数据时,采用 t 检验来确定实验组在前测和后测之间的变量差异。在膝内翻跳跃组中,观察到立定跳远测试(P=0.000)和坐立行走测试(P=0.000)有明显改善。此外,膝上翻腾跳被认为对提高学生的柔韧性更有效,因为坐立测试的 t 值(14.075)高于伏地挺身测试的 t 值(13.811)。同样,跳箱组的伏地挺身测试(P=0.000)和坐立测试(P=0.000)也有明显改善。然而,跳箱被认为在增加学生腿部肌肉力量方面更有效,因为VJ(26.086)的t值高于坐立测试(9.594)。根据研究结果,可以得出结论:负重练习,特别是 KTJ 和 JB,对参加排球课外活动的女学生的下肢肌肉力量和柔韧性有显著的积极影响。尽管两者都有明显的积极影响,但与 JB 相比,KTJ 训练在提高柔韧性方面更有效,而与 KTJ 相比,JB 在增强下肢肌肉力量方面更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信