Leo Strauss, The Latin Averroists and the Eternity of the World

IF 0.5 3区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.53765/20512988.45.1.39

Eduardo Schmidt Passos

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates the philosophy of Siger of Brabant and Boethius of Dacia and their engagement with Thomas Aquinas to assess Leo Strauss’s philosophy. It discusses the relevance of the Latin Averroists for Strauss and the centrality of the eternity of the world to his philosophy. By contrasting the teachings of Siger and Boethius with the main Averroistic theses (the eternity of the world and the unity of the intellect) and assessing Thomas’s contributions to this debate, this article demonstrates the inadequacy of Strauss’s method of interpretation to comprehend the relationship between faith and reason for Christian medieval philosophy.

查看原文本刊更多论文

列奥-施特劳斯，《拉丁阿维罗主义者与世界的永恒性

本文研究了布拉班特的西格和达西亚的波爱修的哲学，以及他们与托马斯-阿奎那的关系，以评估利奥-施特劳斯的哲学。文章讨论了拉丁阿维罗派对施特劳斯的意义以及世界永恒性在其哲学中的核心地位。通过对比西格和波爱修的学说与阿维罗学派的主要论点（世界的永恒性和智慧的统一性）以及评估托马斯对这一辩论的贡献，本文证明了施特劳斯的解释方法不足以理解基督教中世纪哲学中信仰与理性之间的关系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT HISTORY-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： History of Political Thought (HPT) is a quarterly journal which was launched in 1980 to fill a genuine academic need for a forum for work in this multi-disciplinary area. Although a subject central to the study of politics and history, researchers in this field had previously to compete for publication space in journals whose intellectual centres of gravity were located in other disciplines. The journal is devoted exclusively to the historical study of political ideas and associated methodological problems. The primary focus is on research papers, with extensive book reviews and bibliographic surveys also included. All articles are refereed.