Getting it just right: towards balanced utility, privacy, and equity in shared space sensing

IF 3.5 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Andrew Xu, Jacob Biehl, Adam Lee
{"title":"Getting it just right: towards balanced utility, privacy, and equity in shared space sensing","authors":"Andrew Xu, Jacob Biehl, Adam Lee","doi":"10.1145/3648479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low-cost sensors have enabled a wide array of data-driven applications and insights. As a result, encountering spaces with pervasive sensing has become all but unavoidable. This creates a fundamental tension: the success of smart environments will become increasingly dependent on equity of access to data-driven insights and consideration of the privacy expectations of sensed individuals. These concerns highlight the need to bring equity to all stakeholders of smart environments, which in turn would preserve public trust in these smart spaces. In this work, we explored several approaches to identity-obscuring visual representations through a progressive series of experiments. We designed and validated a series of visual representations through stakeholder interactions and tested the ability of these visual representations to limit identification via a crowdsourced study. An evaluation across three months of data gathered within our organization also showed that the identity-obscured data could still be leveraged to accurately count group size. Our contributions lay the groundwork for sensing frameworks that bring utility to all stakeholders of shared spaces while being cognizant of their diverse privacy expectations.","PeriodicalId":29764,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Internet of Things","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Internet of Things","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3648479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low-cost sensors have enabled a wide array of data-driven applications and insights. As a result, encountering spaces with pervasive sensing has become all but unavoidable. This creates a fundamental tension: the success of smart environments will become increasingly dependent on equity of access to data-driven insights and consideration of the privacy expectations of sensed individuals. These concerns highlight the need to bring equity to all stakeholders of smart environments, which in turn would preserve public trust in these smart spaces. In this work, we explored several approaches to identity-obscuring visual representations through a progressive series of experiments. We designed and validated a series of visual representations through stakeholder interactions and tested the ability of these visual representations to limit identification via a crowdsourced study. An evaluation across three months of data gathered within our organization also showed that the identity-obscured data could still be leveraged to accurately count group size. Our contributions lay the groundwork for sensing frameworks that bring utility to all stakeholders of shared spaces while being cognizant of their diverse privacy expectations.
恰到好处:在共享空间感知中兼顾实用性、私密性和公平性
低成本传感器带来了大量数据驱动型应用和洞察力。因此,在空间中使用无处不在的传感器已变得几乎不可避免。这就产生了一个根本性的矛盾:智能环境的成功将越来越取决于能否公平地获取数据驱动的洞察力,以及是否考虑到被感知者的隐私期望。这些问题凸显了为智能环境的所有利益相关者带来公平的必要性,这反过来又会维护公众对这些智能空间的信任。在这项工作中,我们通过一系列循序渐进的实验,探索了几种模糊身份视觉呈现的方法。我们通过利益相关者的互动设计并验证了一系列视觉表征,并通过众包研究测试了这些视觉表征限制身份识别的能力。对我们组织内部收集的三个月数据进行的评估也表明,身份遮蔽数据仍可用于准确计算群体规模。我们的贡献为传感框架奠定了基础,该框架既能为共享空间的所有利益相关者带来实用性,又能考虑到他们对隐私的不同期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信