Assessment of medication adherence in patients with Type 2 Diabetes and arterial hypertension: medication adherence in chronic disease

A. Rosu, André Coelho, P. Camacho
{"title":"Assessment of medication adherence in patients with Type 2 Diabetes and arterial hypertension: medication adherence in chronic disease","authors":"A. Rosu, André Coelho, P. Camacho","doi":"10.51126/revsalus.v6i1.594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Assessment of medication adherence in newly diagnostic and treated patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Arterial Hypertension, in the Primary Health Care Units of Lisbon and Tagus Valley. Methods: This is an observational and retrospective cohort study. The population is composed of newly diagnosed patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Arterial Hypertension, at the beginning of treatment. Data was extracted from the Lisbon and Tagus Valley Regional Health Administration Information System. Medication adherence was assessed in three periods: patients started therapy or not after the professional's prescription (initiation); medication possession rate during the follow-up period (MPR) (implementation) and medication discontinuation, marks the end of therapy (discontinuation). Results: An initiation rate of 84.2% was obtained in patients with both diseases (98% for oral antidiabetic therapy and 84.6% for antihypertensive therapy). The implementation rates (MPR) for both diseases was only 3.4% (4.2% were considered adherent to oral antidiabetic therapy and 8.5% to antihypertensive therapy). The discontinuation rate was 3.4% (5.5% for oral antidiabetic therapy and 13.2% for antihypertensive therapy). Most patients initiate taking drugs after prescription but very few patients have a MPR enough to consider them having good adherence. Moreover, few patients discontinue the medication. Conclusions: Patients had a higher implementation rate to antihypertensive therapy but, on the other hand, were more persistent to the oral antidiabetic therapy. Through this new assessment, the medication adherence pattern seems to be influenced by the patient and by the disease itself.","PeriodicalId":506230,"journal":{"name":"RevSALUS - Revista Científica da Rede Académica das Ciências da Saúde da Lusofonia","volume":"25 47","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RevSALUS - Revista Científica da Rede Académica das Ciências da Saúde da Lusofonia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51126/revsalus.v6i1.594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Assessment of medication adherence in newly diagnostic and treated patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Arterial Hypertension, in the Primary Health Care Units of Lisbon and Tagus Valley. Methods: This is an observational and retrospective cohort study. The population is composed of newly diagnosed patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Arterial Hypertension, at the beginning of treatment. Data was extracted from the Lisbon and Tagus Valley Regional Health Administration Information System. Medication adherence was assessed in three periods: patients started therapy or not after the professional's prescription (initiation); medication possession rate during the follow-up period (MPR) (implementation) and medication discontinuation, marks the end of therapy (discontinuation). Results: An initiation rate of 84.2% was obtained in patients with both diseases (98% for oral antidiabetic therapy and 84.6% for antihypertensive therapy). The implementation rates (MPR) for both diseases was only 3.4% (4.2% were considered adherent to oral antidiabetic therapy and 8.5% to antihypertensive therapy). The discontinuation rate was 3.4% (5.5% for oral antidiabetic therapy and 13.2% for antihypertensive therapy). Most patients initiate taking drugs after prescription but very few patients have a MPR enough to consider them having good adherence. Moreover, few patients discontinue the medication. Conclusions: Patients had a higher implementation rate to antihypertensive therapy but, on the other hand, were more persistent to the oral antidiabetic therapy. Through this new assessment, the medication adherence pattern seems to be influenced by the patient and by the disease itself.
评估 2 型糖尿病和动脉高血压患者的服药依从性:慢性病患者的服药依从性
目的:评估里斯本和塔古斯河谷基层医疗机构新诊断和治疗的 2 型糖尿病和动脉高血压患者的用药依从性。研究方法这是一项观察性和回顾性队列研究。研究对象为开始治疗时新确诊的 2 型糖尿病和动脉高血压患者。数据来自里斯本和塔古斯河谷地区卫生管理信息系统。对用药依从性的评估分为三个阶段:患者是否在专业人士开具处方后开始治疗(开始);随访期间的药物持有率(实施);以及药物停用,标志着治疗的结束(停药)。结果显示两种疾病患者的开始用药率均为 84.2%(口服抗糖尿病药物治疗的开始用药率为 98%,抗高血压药物治疗的开始用药率为 84.6%)。两种疾病的执行率(MPR)仅为 3.4%(4.2%的患者被认为坚持口服抗糖尿病疗法,8.5%的患者坚持降压疗法)。停药率为 3.4%(口服降糖药为 5.5%,降压药为 13.2%)。大多数患者在处方开具后开始服药,但只有极少数患者的服药依从率足以让人认为他们具有良好的依从性。此外,停药的患者也很少。结论患者对降压治疗的执行率较高,但另一方面,患者对口服抗糖尿病治疗的依从性较高。通过这项新的评估,用药依从性模式似乎受到患者和疾病本身的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信