A comparative finite element analysis of titanium, poly-ether-etherketone, and zirconia abutment on stress distribution around maxillary anterior implants

Q2 Dentistry
Angel Elias, R. F. Banu, A. Vaidyanathan, T. V. Padmanabhan
{"title":"A comparative finite element analysis of titanium, poly-ether-etherketone, and zirconia abutment on stress distribution around maxillary anterior implants","authors":"Angel Elias, R. F. Banu, A. Vaidyanathan, T. V. Padmanabhan","doi":"10.4103/drj.drj_769_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of abutment material, alveolar bone density, and occlusal forces on stress distribution around maxillary anterior implants.\n \n \n \n An in-vitro study was conducted. The maxillary anterior implant was modeled using a three-dimensional finite element model in D2 and D3 bones with three different abutment materials: titanium, zirconia, and poly-ether-ether ketone (PEEK). Von Mises stress was evaluated after the application of vertical and oblique loads of 100 N, 175 N, and 250 N. Statistical analysis was done by Friedman-Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis test. The probability value <0.05 is considered a significant level.\n \n \n \n Stress distribution around D3 bone was higher than D2 bone in all the abutment materials with greater values seen in oblique load than vertical load with insignificant difference ( P > 0.05). Statistically insignificant stress values were seen greater in PEEK than titanium or zirconia abutment ( P > 0.05). A statistically significant difference was observed between 100 N and 175 N of load ( P < 0.05).\n \n \n \n PEEK, zirconia, and titanium as abutment material in the anterior region showed similar properties. The stress on the bone was proportionately increased during the vertical and oblique loads suggesting the influence of mechanical load in crestal bone loss rather than the type of abutment material.\n","PeriodicalId":11016,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research Journal","volume":"9 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/drj.drj_769_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of abutment material, alveolar bone density, and occlusal forces on stress distribution around maxillary anterior implants. An in-vitro study was conducted. The maxillary anterior implant was modeled using a three-dimensional finite element model in D2 and D3 bones with three different abutment materials: titanium, zirconia, and poly-ether-ether ketone (PEEK). Von Mises stress was evaluated after the application of vertical and oblique loads of 100 N, 175 N, and 250 N. Statistical analysis was done by Friedman-Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis test. The probability value <0.05 is considered a significant level. Stress distribution around D3 bone was higher than D2 bone in all the abutment materials with greater values seen in oblique load than vertical load with insignificant difference ( P > 0.05). Statistically insignificant stress values were seen greater in PEEK than titanium or zirconia abutment ( P > 0.05). A statistically significant difference was observed between 100 N and 175 N of load ( P < 0.05). PEEK, zirconia, and titanium as abutment material in the anterior region showed similar properties. The stress on the bone was proportionately increased during the vertical and oblique loads suggesting the influence of mechanical load in crestal bone loss rather than the type of abutment material.
钛、聚醚醚酮和氧化锆基台对上颌前牙种植体周围应力分布的有限元比较分析
本研究旨在探讨基台材料、牙槽骨密度和咬合力对上颌前牙种植体周围应力分布的影响。 研究进行了体外研究。在 D2 和 D3 骨中使用三维有限元模型对上颌前牙种植体进行建模,并使用三种不同的基台材料:钛、氧化锆和聚醚醚酮(PEEK)。在施加 100 N、175 N 和 250 N 的垂直和倾斜载荷后,对 Von Mises 应力进行了评估。统计分析采用 Friedman-Wilcoxon 符号秩检验、Mann-Whitney U 检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验。概率值为 0.05)。与钛或氧化锆基台相比,PEEK 基台的应力值更大,这在统计学上并不显著(P > 0.05)。100 N 和 175 N 负荷之间的差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。 前牙区域的 PEEK、氧化锆和钛基台材料显示出相似的特性。在垂直和倾斜载荷作用下,骨的应力成比例增加,这表明骨嵴骨质流失受机械载荷的影响,而不是基台材料的类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dental Research Journal
Dental Research Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Dental Research Journal, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Bimonthly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.drjjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Dentistry. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信