Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) practices among residents of different slum settlements in a ward of Kolkata: A mixed-methods study

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Kuntala Ray, Vineeta Shukla, Mausumi Basu, Sukanta Manna, Mamunur Rashid, Aparajita Mondal
{"title":"Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) practices among residents of different slum settlements in a ward of Kolkata: A mixed-methods study","authors":"Kuntala Ray, Vineeta Shukla, Mausumi Basu, Sukanta Manna, Mamunur Rashid, Aparajita Mondal","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_995_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Access to safe water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) is the most basic need for mankind. Poor WASH practices are associated with various waterborne diseases, especially in developing countries such as India. The aim of the study was to assess WASH practices among residents of different slum settlements in a ward of Kolkata, identify the factors associated with WASH practice, and explore the barriers faced by the families and municipal staff in providing adequate WASH services to the community.\n \n \n \n An observational study, cross-sectional in design with a convergent parallel mixed–methods approach, was conducted in different slum settlements in a ward of Kolkata. Quantitative data were collected by face-to-face interview, spot observation, and measuring the living area, door, and window spaces. Key informant interviews were conducted with the medical officer, ward vector-control coordinator, and municipal waste handlers, in addition to in-depth interviews with respondents who had unsatisfactory WASH practices. SPSS version 25.0 was used to analyze the quantitative data. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically using Atlas.ti 22.\n \n \n \n The overall WASH practices were considered satisfactory in 58.8% of the households. Education of the respondents up to the secondary level, presence of overcrowding, and inadequate ventilation in the house had statistically significantly higher odds of unsatisfactory practice. Poor living conditions, difficulty in collecting and storing water, waterlogging, blocked sewage drains, common toilets for men and women, and lack of motivation were the primary obstacles identified by the residents.\n \n \n \n Unsatisfactory WASH practices were observed among a high proportion of the slum population. Community engagement and education regarding WASH in communities is strongly recommended along with improvement of infrastructure and capacity building.\n","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_995_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Access to safe water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) is the most basic need for mankind. Poor WASH practices are associated with various waterborne diseases, especially in developing countries such as India. The aim of the study was to assess WASH practices among residents of different slum settlements in a ward of Kolkata, identify the factors associated with WASH practice, and explore the barriers faced by the families and municipal staff in providing adequate WASH services to the community. An observational study, cross-sectional in design with a convergent parallel mixed–methods approach, was conducted in different slum settlements in a ward of Kolkata. Quantitative data were collected by face-to-face interview, spot observation, and measuring the living area, door, and window spaces. Key informant interviews were conducted with the medical officer, ward vector-control coordinator, and municipal waste handlers, in addition to in-depth interviews with respondents who had unsatisfactory WASH practices. SPSS version 25.0 was used to analyze the quantitative data. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically using Atlas.ti 22. The overall WASH practices were considered satisfactory in 58.8% of the households. Education of the respondents up to the secondary level, presence of overcrowding, and inadequate ventilation in the house had statistically significantly higher odds of unsatisfactory practice. Poor living conditions, difficulty in collecting and storing water, waterlogging, blocked sewage drains, common toilets for men and women, and lack of motivation were the primary obstacles identified by the residents. Unsatisfactory WASH practices were observed among a high proportion of the slum population. Community engagement and education regarding WASH in communities is strongly recommended along with improvement of infrastructure and capacity building.
加尔各答一个区不同贫民窟居民的水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)做法:一项混合方法研究
获得安全饮用水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)是人类最基本的需求。不良的饮水、环卫和讲卫生做法与各种水传播疾病有关,尤其是在印度等发展中国家。本研究旨在评估加尔各答一个区内不同贫民窟居民的讲卫生做法,确定与讲卫生做法相关的因素,并探讨家庭和市政工作人员在为社区提供适当的讲卫生服务时所面临的障碍。 我们在加尔各答一个区的不同贫民窟开展了一项观察研究,该研究采用横断面设计,并采用了趋同平行的混合方法。通过面对面访谈、现场观察、测量居住面积、门窗空间等方式收集定量数据。此外,还对医务人员、病房病媒控制协调员和城市垃圾处理人员进行了关键信息访谈,并对不满意讲卫生做法的受访者进行了深入访谈。定量数据采用 SPSS 25.0 版进行分析。使用 Atlas.ti 22 对定性数据进行了专题分析。 58.8%的家庭对整体讲卫生做法表示满意。从统计学角度看,受访者的教育程度达到中学水平、房屋过于拥挤和通风不足导致做法不满意的几率明显较高。居住条件差、取水和储水困难、内涝、下水道堵塞、男女共用厕所以及缺乏动力是居民发现的主要障碍。 据观察,有很大一部分贫民窟居民的讲卫生做法不尽人意。强烈建议在改善基础设施和能力建设的同时,在社区开展有关讲卫生运动的社区参与和教育活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信