Hand hygiene compliance and improvement interventions in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Rbab M. Bajunaid , Abduallah Saeed , Muataz Bostaji , Nada J. Farsi
{"title":"Hand hygiene compliance and improvement interventions in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Rbab M. Bajunaid ,&nbsp;Abduallah Saeed ,&nbsp;Muataz Bostaji ,&nbsp;Nada J. Farsi","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers is crucial for preventing infections in healthcare settings. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the compliance of healthcare workers in the Eastern Mediterranean region with hand hygiene guidelines and synthesize evidence on the success rate of strategies to improve hand hygiene. Five electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus) were searched up to August 2020. Articles were included if they were conducted in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. A manual search was conducted for reference lists of included papers, and relevant additional references were reviewed. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion, performed data extraction, and assessed quality. A meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize findings and determine the prevalence of hand hygiene compliance interventions. The search yielded 6678 articles. After removing duplicates and applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, 42 articles were included, of which 24 were meta-analyzed. The meta-analysis showed a compliance prevalence of 32% with significant heterogeneity (<em>I<sup>2</sup></em>= 99.7% p &lt;0.001). Interventions using the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines were over two times more likely to improve compliance rates (OR= 2.26, [95% CI:(2.09 - 2.44)], <em>I<sup>2</sup></em>= 95%, p&lt;0.001) compared to no intervention. Other interventions were close to two times more likely to improve compliance rates (OR= 1.84, [95% CI:(1.66 - 2.04)], <em>I<sup>2</sup></em>= 98% p= 0.001). Approximately two-thirds of healthcare providers in the Eastern Mediterranean region were non-compliant with standard hand hygiene practices, highlighting the need for increased efforts, awareness, observation, and control policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088924000271/pdfft?md5=9c87e9f732728fec18c03882419a1b05&pid=1-s2.0-S2590088924000271-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Prevention in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088924000271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers is crucial for preventing infections in healthcare settings. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the compliance of healthcare workers in the Eastern Mediterranean region with hand hygiene guidelines and synthesize evidence on the success rate of strategies to improve hand hygiene. Five electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus) were searched up to August 2020. Articles were included if they were conducted in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. A manual search was conducted for reference lists of included papers, and relevant additional references were reviewed. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion, performed data extraction, and assessed quality. A meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize findings and determine the prevalence of hand hygiene compliance interventions. The search yielded 6678 articles. After removing duplicates and applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, 42 articles were included, of which 24 were meta-analyzed. The meta-analysis showed a compliance prevalence of 32% with significant heterogeneity (I2= 99.7% p <0.001). Interventions using the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines were over two times more likely to improve compliance rates (OR= 2.26, [95% CI:(2.09 - 2.44)], I2= 95%, p<0.001) compared to no intervention. Other interventions were close to two times more likely to improve compliance rates (OR= 1.84, [95% CI:(1.66 - 2.04)], I2= 98% p= 0.001). Approximately two-thirds of healthcare providers in the Eastern Mediterranean region were non-compliant with standard hand hygiene practices, highlighting the need for increased efforts, awareness, observation, and control policies.

东地中海地区手部卫生达标情况和改善干预措施:系统回顾与元分析
医护人员遵守手部卫生规范对于预防医疗机构中的感染至关重要。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估东地中海地区医护人员遵守手部卫生指南的情况,并综合有关改善手部卫生策略成功率的证据。截至 2020 年 8 月,共检索了五个电子数据库(PubMed、CINAHL、Cochrane、Web of Science 和 Scopus)。在东地中海地区进行研究的文章均被收录。对纳入论文的参考文献目录进行了人工检索,并查阅了相关的其他参考文献。两名审稿人独立筛选纳入文章、进行数据提取和质量评估。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以综合研究结果并确定手卫生依从性干预措施的普及率。搜索共获得 6678 篇文章。在去除重复文章并应用纳入/排除标准后,共纳入 42 篇文章,并对其中 24 篇文章进行了荟萃分析。荟萃分析表明,合规率为 32%,异质性显著(I2= 99.7% p <0.001)。与不采取干预措施相比,采用世界卫生组织(WHO)指南进行干预可提高依从率(OR= 2.26,[95% CI:(2.09 - 2.44)],I2= 95%,p<0.001)两倍多。其他干预措施提高依从率的可能性接近两倍(OR= 1.84,[95% CI:(1.66 - 2.04)],I2= 98%,p= 0.001)。东地中海地区约有三分之二的医疗服务提供者不遵守标准手卫生规范,这凸显了加强努力、提高认识、观察和控制政策的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection Prevention in Practice
Infection Prevention in Practice Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
61 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信