Reducing inter-unit pollutant transfer through multifamily unit compartmentalization

Scott W. Adler , Deborah H. Bennett , Mark P. Modera
{"title":"Reducing inter-unit pollutant transfer through multifamily unit compartmentalization","authors":"Scott W. Adler ,&nbsp;Deborah H. Bennett ,&nbsp;Mark P. Modera","doi":"10.1016/j.indenv.2024.100014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Compartmentalization, which refers to air sealing each unit within a building from the exterior and other interior spaces, has been proposed as a strategy to improve indoor air quality and energy efficiency in multifamily buildings. This study collected field data on air tightness and pollutant transfer in three new-construction multifamily buildings in California, which was used to develop a model in CONTAM that simulated the impact of leakage levels, ventilation strategies, and climate zones on inter-unit pollutant transfer in multifamily buildings. Air leakage testing found an average total unit leakage of 0.8 L/s<sub>50</sub>/m<sup>2</sup>, almost twice as tight as California’s current compartmentalization requirement (1.5 L/s<sub>50</sub>/m<sup>2</sup>). Two buildings designed with balanced ventilation systems were measured to have imbalanced continuous unit ventilation flows, which were further imbalanced by intermittent exhaust fan operation. Tracer gas testing in two buildings indicated that only about 1–3% of the total air entering a unit came from each neighbouring unit. Furthermore, all particles were apparently removed along the way, as there was no observable particle matter transfer at the tested air tightness levels (0.6–0.9 L/s<sub>50</sub>/m<sup>2</sup>). Modelling results indicated that leakier units led to greater dilution of pollutants generated within the unit but increased gaseous pollutant transfer from neighbouring units. The average concentration of benzene, a proxy gas for cigarette smoke, transferred into non-smoking units from neighbours who did smoke almost doubled, surpassing acceptable exposure levels, in the leaky simulation (2.3 L/s<sub>50</sub>/m<sup>2</sup>) compared to the tight simulation (0.8 L/s<sub>50</sub>/m<sup>2</sup>). Overall, this study suggests that stricter compartmentalization requirements should be adopted in multifamily building code updates, as tighter requirements appear to be manageable for builders and beneficial for indoor air quality when combined with mechanical ventilation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100665,"journal":{"name":"Indoor Environments","volume":"1 2","pages":"Article 100014"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950362024000110/pdfft?md5=06fa7aff76730c67366516e392a6eeb3&pid=1-s2.0-S2950362024000110-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indoor Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950362024000110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Compartmentalization, which refers to air sealing each unit within a building from the exterior and other interior spaces, has been proposed as a strategy to improve indoor air quality and energy efficiency in multifamily buildings. This study collected field data on air tightness and pollutant transfer in three new-construction multifamily buildings in California, which was used to develop a model in CONTAM that simulated the impact of leakage levels, ventilation strategies, and climate zones on inter-unit pollutant transfer in multifamily buildings. Air leakage testing found an average total unit leakage of 0.8 L/s50/m2, almost twice as tight as California’s current compartmentalization requirement (1.5 L/s50/m2). Two buildings designed with balanced ventilation systems were measured to have imbalanced continuous unit ventilation flows, which were further imbalanced by intermittent exhaust fan operation. Tracer gas testing in two buildings indicated that only about 1–3% of the total air entering a unit came from each neighbouring unit. Furthermore, all particles were apparently removed along the way, as there was no observable particle matter transfer at the tested air tightness levels (0.6–0.9 L/s50/m2). Modelling results indicated that leakier units led to greater dilution of pollutants generated within the unit but increased gaseous pollutant transfer from neighbouring units. The average concentration of benzene, a proxy gas for cigarette smoke, transferred into non-smoking units from neighbours who did smoke almost doubled, surpassing acceptable exposure levels, in the leaky simulation (2.3 L/s50/m2) compared to the tight simulation (0.8 L/s50/m2). Overall, this study suggests that stricter compartmentalization requirements should be adopted in multifamily building code updates, as tighter requirements appear to be manageable for builders and beneficial for indoor air quality when combined with mechanical ventilation.

通过多户住宅单元分隔减少单元间污染物转移
分隔是指将建筑物内的每个单元与外部和其他内部空间进行空气密封,已被提出作为改善多户住宅建筑室内空气质量和能源效率的一种策略。这项研究收集了加利福尼亚州三座新建多户住宅建筑的气密性和污染物转移的现场数据,并利用这些数据在 CONTAM 中开发了一个模型,模拟泄漏水平、通风策略和气候区对多户住宅建筑中单元间污染物转移的影响。空气泄漏测试发现,平均总单元泄漏量为 0.8 升/秒 50/平方米,几乎是加州现行分隔要求(1.5 升/秒 50/平方米)的两倍。有两栋建筑在设计时采用了平衡通风系统,但经测量发现,其连续单元通风流量不平衡,而排气扇的间歇运行又进一步加剧了这种不平衡。两栋楼的示踪气体测试表明,进入一个单元的总空气量中,只有约 1-3% 来自每个相邻单元。此外,由于在测试的气密性水平(0.6-0.9 升/秒50/平方米)下没有观察到微粒物质的转移,因此所有微粒显然都在途中被清除了。建模结果表明,更易泄漏的单元会更大程度地稀释单元内产生的污染物,但会增加从邻近单元转移的气态污染物。与严密模拟(0.8 升/秒/平方米)相比,泄漏模拟(2.3 升/秒50/平方米)中从吸烟邻居处转移到非吸烟单位的苯(香烟烟雾的替代气体)的平均浓度几乎增加了一倍,超过了可接受的暴露水平。总之,这项研究表明,在更新多户住宅建筑规范时应采用更严格的分隔要求,因为更严格的要求似乎对建筑商来说是可控的,并且在与机械通风相结合时有利于室内空气质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信