{"title":"Pendekatan Terhadap Islam Dalam Studi Agama","authors":"I. Isfihani","doi":"10.62096/sq.v5i1.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One prominent issue in contemporary Islamic Studies discourse is the adaptation of methodologies and epistemologies that have significantly evolved, causing themes in Islamic Studies to be perceived as rigid and static due to not keeping pace with contemporary scientific developments. The controversy surrounding the adoption of these methodologies generally divides the Islamic community into two opinions. The first opinion suggests that the current lag in the Islamic community is not due to a lack of responsiveness or adaptability to various scientific-philosophical-academic advancements. Instead, it asserts that the lag is a result of Muslims abandoning their rich intellectual and scientific heritage. Therefore, the proposed solution to revive the Islamic community from its decline is through a \"back to the past\" approach, retracing the steps of the classical Islamic scientific civilization that once flourished. This viewpoint is represented by Muhammad Abdul Rauf. On the other hand, the second opinion contends that the adaptation of methodologies is imperative if the Islamic community is to avoid falling behind in the competition of scientific-philosophical-academic discourse, which has implications for the rapid growth of civilization with the scientific-philosophical-academic world as its axis. This perspective is represented by Fazlur Rahman.","PeriodicalId":517556,"journal":{"name":"Sanaamul Quran: Jurnal Wawasan Keislaman","volume":"347 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sanaamul Quran: Jurnal Wawasan Keislaman","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62096/sq.v5i1.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
One prominent issue in contemporary Islamic Studies discourse is the adaptation of methodologies and epistemologies that have significantly evolved, causing themes in Islamic Studies to be perceived as rigid and static due to not keeping pace with contemporary scientific developments. The controversy surrounding the adoption of these methodologies generally divides the Islamic community into two opinions. The first opinion suggests that the current lag in the Islamic community is not due to a lack of responsiveness or adaptability to various scientific-philosophical-academic advancements. Instead, it asserts that the lag is a result of Muslims abandoning their rich intellectual and scientific heritage. Therefore, the proposed solution to revive the Islamic community from its decline is through a "back to the past" approach, retracing the steps of the classical Islamic scientific civilization that once flourished. This viewpoint is represented by Muhammad Abdul Rauf. On the other hand, the second opinion contends that the adaptation of methodologies is imperative if the Islamic community is to avoid falling behind in the competition of scientific-philosophical-academic discourse, which has implications for the rapid growth of civilization with the scientific-philosophical-academic world as its axis. This perspective is represented by Fazlur Rahman.
当代伊斯兰研究话语中的一个突出问题是对已发生重大演变的方法论和认识论进行调整,这导致伊斯兰研究的主题因跟不上当代科学发展的步伐而被视为僵化和静止的。围绕采用这些方法论的争议通常将伊斯兰社区分为两种观点。第一种观点认为,伊斯兰教界目前的滞后并不是因为缺乏对各种科学-哲学-学术进步的反应能力或适应能力。相反,第一种观点认为,这种落后是穆斯林放弃了其丰富的知识和科学遗产的结果。因此,为使伊斯兰社会摆脱衰落而提出的解决办法是 "回到过去",追溯曾经繁荣昌盛的伊斯兰古典科学文明。这种观点的代表人物是穆罕默德-阿卜杜勒-拉乌夫(Muhammad Abdul Rauf)。另一方面,第二种观点认为,如果伊斯兰社会要避免在科学-哲学-学术话语的竞争中落后,就必须调整方法论,这对以科学-哲学-学术世界为轴心的文明的快速发展具有影响。法兹卢尔-拉赫曼代表了这一观点。