Executive function and preterm birth: A longitudinal study

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Patricia M. Blasco , Serra Acar , Sybille M. Guy , Sage N. Saxton , Susanne Duvall , Kristi L. Atkins , Sheila Markwardt
{"title":"Executive function and preterm birth: A longitudinal study","authors":"Patricia M. Blasco ,&nbsp;Serra Acar ,&nbsp;Sybille M. Guy ,&nbsp;Sage N. Saxton ,&nbsp;Susanne Duvall ,&nbsp;Kristi L. Atkins ,&nbsp;Sheila Markwardt","doi":"10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.105996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Infants born low birth weight (LBW) and preterm are at risk for developmental delay and cognitive deficits. These deficits can lead to lifelong learning difficulties and high-risk behaviors.</p><p>Preterm (PT) and full-term (FT) groups were compared across infant and toddler measures of behavior and development to extract early indicators of executive function (EF). The goal was to extract indicators of EF from standardized infant assessments.</p><p>PT (&lt;2500 grams and &lt;37 weeks) and FT (&gt; 2500 grams and &gt;37 weeks) were compared across assessment and EF components were identified from the BSID-III. A multivariate linear model was used to examine group differences.</p><p>All children (99 PT and 46 FT) were administered the Bayley III and the DMQ assessments for session 1 (6-8 months). During session 2, N=78 PT and 37 FT (18-20 months), the CBCL was added to previous assessments, and the BRIEF-P was added to previous assessments in session 3, N= 52 PT and 36 FT for session 3 (See Table 1).</p><p>Significant change scores were found on BSID-III subtests and EF components across all 3 sessions. The PT group also showed significantly more behavioral concerns on the CBCL at 18 months and 36 months and had lower scores on the BRIEF-P than their FT peers. The number of children born PT (N = 27, 52%) who were in Early Intervention (EI) increased across the 3 sessions. Examining early indicators of EFs supported the development of early identification that could lead to decrease adverse outcomes often associated with preterm birth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11435,"journal":{"name":"Early human development","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 105996"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early human development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378224000653","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infants born low birth weight (LBW) and preterm are at risk for developmental delay and cognitive deficits. These deficits can lead to lifelong learning difficulties and high-risk behaviors.

Preterm (PT) and full-term (FT) groups were compared across infant and toddler measures of behavior and development to extract early indicators of executive function (EF). The goal was to extract indicators of EF from standardized infant assessments.

PT (<2500 grams and <37 weeks) and FT (> 2500 grams and >37 weeks) were compared across assessment and EF components were identified from the BSID-III. A multivariate linear model was used to examine group differences.

All children (99 PT and 46 FT) were administered the Bayley III and the DMQ assessments for session 1 (6-8 months). During session 2, N=78 PT and 37 FT (18-20 months), the CBCL was added to previous assessments, and the BRIEF-P was added to previous assessments in session 3, N= 52 PT and 36 FT for session 3 (See Table 1).

Significant change scores were found on BSID-III subtests and EF components across all 3 sessions. The PT group also showed significantly more behavioral concerns on the CBCL at 18 months and 36 months and had lower scores on the BRIEF-P than their FT peers. The number of children born PT (N = 27, 52%) who were in Early Intervention (EI) increased across the 3 sessions. Examining early indicators of EFs supported the development of early identification that could lead to decrease adverse outcomes often associated with preterm birth.

执行功能与早产:纵向研究
出生体重不足(LBW)和早产儿有可能出现发育迟缓和认知缺陷。早产儿(PT)组和足月儿(FT)组通过对婴幼儿行为和发育的测量进行比较,以提取执行功能(EF)的早期指标。我们对早产儿(2500 克和 37 周)和足月儿(2500 克和 37 周)进行了比较,并从 BSID-III 中确定了执行功能的组成部分。所有儿童(99 名发育迟缓儿童和 46 名发育迟缓儿童)都接受了 Bayley III 和 DMQ 评估,评估时间为第一阶段(6-8 个月)。在第 2 个疗程中(78 名 PT 和 37 名 FT,18-20 个月),在先前评估的基础上增加了 CBCL,在第 3 个疗程中(52 名 PT 和 36 名 FT,第 3 个疗程)在先前评估的基础上增加了 BRIEF-P(见表 1)。在 18 个月和 36 个月时,PT 组在 CBCL 中表现出的行为问题也明显多于 FT 组,在 BRIEF-P 中的得分也低于 FT 组。在这三个阶段中,接受早期干预(EI)的 PT 出生儿童(N = 27,52%)人数有所增加。对早期EFs指标的研究有助于发展早期识别能力,从而减少与早产相关的不良后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Early human development
Early human development 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Established as an authoritative, highly cited voice on early human development, Early Human Development provides a unique opportunity for researchers and clinicians to bridge the communication gap between disciplines. Creating a forum for the productive exchange of ideas concerning early human growth and development, the journal publishes original research and clinical papers with particular emphasis on the continuum between fetal life and the perinatal period; aspects of postnatal growth influenced by early events; and the safeguarding of the quality of human survival. The first comprehensive and interdisciplinary journal in this area of growing importance, Early Human Development offers pertinent contributions to the following subject areas: Fetology; perinatology; pediatrics; growth and development; obstetrics; reproduction and fertility; epidemiology; behavioural sciences; nutrition and metabolism; teratology; neurology; brain biology; developmental psychology and screening.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信