Effects of Stepdown Pressure and Wettability on Bubble Nucleation in Gas-Supersaturated Oil-Water Systems

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM
SPE Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.2118/219740-pa
Sushobhan Pradhan, P. Bikkina
{"title":"Effects of Stepdown Pressure and Wettability on Bubble Nucleation in Gas-Supersaturated Oil-Water Systems","authors":"Sushobhan Pradhan, P. Bikkina","doi":"10.2118/219740-pa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study investigates the influences of wettability and stepdown pressure on pressure-driven bubble nucleation within a gas-supersaturated oil-water system. Two gases—carbon dioxide (CO2), which is highly soluble in water, and methane (CH4), which is sparingly soluble in water—were used individually for the bubble nucleation experiments. Equal heights of oil (n-decane) and water, in a wettability-controlled glass vial placed in a saturation cell, were saturated with either of the gases at 6000-mbar pressure, followed by applying a stepdown pressure of either 6000 mbar, 500 mbar, or 100 mbar to start the bubble nucleation process. The average bubble nucleation pressures for CO2 and CH4 gases on a hydrophobic vial surface with 500-mbar stepdown pressure were 4333 ± 289 mbar and 3833 ± 289 mbar, respectively. It is important to note that the bubble nucleation took place exclusively on the portion of the solid surface submerged in water. However, bubble nucleation did not take place with 100-mbar stepdown pressure for either gas in the hydrophobic vial despite the pressure being brought down to atmospheric pressure. As expected, bubble nucleation did not take place in the hydrophilic vial for the gases despite the pressure being brought down to atmospheric pressure from the saturation pressure, regardless of the stepdown pressure. In addition, bubble nucleation did not take place in CO2-supersaturated water in the oil-wetted hydrophilic and hydrophobic vials, even at maximum supersaturation.","PeriodicalId":22252,"journal":{"name":"SPE Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/219740-pa","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the influences of wettability and stepdown pressure on pressure-driven bubble nucleation within a gas-supersaturated oil-water system. Two gases—carbon dioxide (CO2), which is highly soluble in water, and methane (CH4), which is sparingly soluble in water—were used individually for the bubble nucleation experiments. Equal heights of oil (n-decane) and water, in a wettability-controlled glass vial placed in a saturation cell, were saturated with either of the gases at 6000-mbar pressure, followed by applying a stepdown pressure of either 6000 mbar, 500 mbar, or 100 mbar to start the bubble nucleation process. The average bubble nucleation pressures for CO2 and CH4 gases on a hydrophobic vial surface with 500-mbar stepdown pressure were 4333 ± 289 mbar and 3833 ± 289 mbar, respectively. It is important to note that the bubble nucleation took place exclusively on the portion of the solid surface submerged in water. However, bubble nucleation did not take place with 100-mbar stepdown pressure for either gas in the hydrophobic vial despite the pressure being brought down to atmospheric pressure. As expected, bubble nucleation did not take place in the hydrophilic vial for the gases despite the pressure being brought down to atmospheric pressure from the saturation pressure, regardless of the stepdown pressure. In addition, bubble nucleation did not take place in CO2-supersaturated water in the oil-wetted hydrophilic and hydrophobic vials, even at maximum supersaturation.
降压和润湿性对气体过饱和油水体系中气泡成核的影响
本研究探讨了润湿性和降压对气体过饱和油水体系中压力驱动气泡成核的影响。气泡成核实验分别使用了两种气体--高溶于水的二氧化碳(CO2)和低溶于水的甲烷(CH4)。在饱和池中放置了一个润湿性可控的玻璃瓶,在 6000 毫巴压力下,等高度的油(正癸烷)和水被其中一种气体饱和,然后施加 6000 毫巴、500 毫巴或 100 毫巴的降压,以启动气泡成核过程。在降压 500 毫巴的情况下,疏水性小瓶表面上二氧化碳和甲烷气体的平均气泡成核压力分别为 4333 ± 289 毫巴和 3833 ± 289 毫巴。值得注意的是,气泡成核完全发生在浸没在水中的固体表面部分。然而,尽管疏水瓶中的压力已降至大气压,但在 100 毫巴降压压力下,两种气体均未出现气泡成核现象。不出所料,在亲水小瓶中,尽管压力从饱和压力降到了大气压力,但无论降压压力如何,气体都不会出现气泡成核现象。此外,即使在最大过饱和度时,亲水瓶和疏水瓶中的二氧化碳过饱和水中也不会出现气泡成核现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SPE Journal
SPE Journal 工程技术-工程:石油
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
229
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Covers theories and emerging concepts spanning all aspects of engineering for oil and gas exploration and production, including reservoir characterization, multiphase flow, drilling dynamics, well architecture, gas well deliverability, numerical simulation, enhanced oil recovery, CO2 sequestration, and benchmarking and performance indicators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信