Co-relation of Portal Vein Tumour Thrombus Response With Survival Function Following Robotic Radiosurgery in Vascular Invasive Hepatocellular Carcinoma

IF 3.3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Debnarayan Dutta , Sreenija Yarlagadda , Sruthi Kalavagunta , Haridas Nair , Ajay Sasidharan , Sathish Kumar Nimmya , Rajesh Kannan , Shibu George , Annex Edappattu , Nikhil K. Haridas , Wesley M. Jose , Pavithran Keechilat , Arun Valsan , Anoop Koshy , Rajesh Gopalakrishna , Shine Sadasivan , Unnikrishnan Gopalakrishnan , Dinesh Balakrishnan , Othiyil Vayoth Sudheer , Sudhindran Surendran
{"title":"Co-relation of Portal Vein Tumour Thrombus Response With Survival Function Following Robotic Radiosurgery in Vascular Invasive Hepatocellular Carcinoma","authors":"Debnarayan Dutta ,&nbsp;Sreenija Yarlagadda ,&nbsp;Sruthi Kalavagunta ,&nbsp;Haridas Nair ,&nbsp;Ajay Sasidharan ,&nbsp;Sathish Kumar Nimmya ,&nbsp;Rajesh Kannan ,&nbsp;Shibu George ,&nbsp;Annex Edappattu ,&nbsp;Nikhil K. Haridas ,&nbsp;Wesley M. Jose ,&nbsp;Pavithran Keechilat ,&nbsp;Arun Valsan ,&nbsp;Anoop Koshy ,&nbsp;Rajesh Gopalakrishna ,&nbsp;Shine Sadasivan ,&nbsp;Unnikrishnan Gopalakrishnan ,&nbsp;Dinesh Balakrishnan ,&nbsp;Othiyil Vayoth Sudheer ,&nbsp;Sudhindran Surendran","doi":"10.1016/j.jceh.2024.101404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/aims</h3><p>The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with robotic radiosurgery in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with macrovascular invasion (HCC-PVT).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Patients with inoperable HCC-PVT, good performance score (PS0-1) and preserved liver function [up to Child-Pugh (CP) B7] were accrued after ethical and scientific committee approval [Clinical trial registry-India (CTRI): 2022/01/050234] for treatment on robotic radiosurgery (M6) and planned with Multiplan (iDMS V2.0). Triple-phase contrast computed tomography (CT) scan was performed for contouring, and gross tumour volume (GTV) included contrast-enhancing mass within main portal vein and adjacent parenchymal disease. Dose prescription was as per risk stratification protocol (22–50 Gy in 5 fractions) while achieving the constraints of mean liver dose &lt;15 Gy, 800 cc liver &lt;8 Gy and the duodenum max of &lt;24 Gy). Response assessment was done at 2 months’ follow-up for recanalization. Patient- and treatment-related factors were evaluated for influence in survival function.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between Jan 2017 and May 2022, 318 consecutive HCC with PVT patients were screened and 219 patients were accrued [male 92%, CP score: 5–7 90%, mean age: 63 years (38–85 yrs), Cancer of the Liver Italian Program &lt;3: 84 (40%), 3–6117 (56%), infective aetiology 9.5%, performance status (PS): 0–37%; 1–56%]. Among 209 consecutive patients accrued for SBRT treatment (10 patients were excluded after accrual due to ascites and decompensation), 139 were evaluable for response assessment (&gt;2 mo follow-up). At mean follow-up of 12.21 months (standard deviation: 10.66), 88 (63%) patients expired and 51 (36%) were alive. Eighty-two (59%) patients had recanalization of PVT (response), 57 (41%) patients did not recanalize and 28 (17%) had progressive/metastatic disease prior to response evaluation (&lt;2 months). Mean overall survival (OS) in responders and non-responders were 18.4 [standard error (SE): 2.52] and 9.34 month (SE 0.81), respectively (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Mean survival in patients with PS0, PS1 and PS2 were 17, 11.7 and 9.7 months (<em>P</em> = 0.019), respectively. OS in partial recanalization, bland thrombus and complete recanalization was 12.4, 14.1 and 30.3 months, respectively (<em>P</em>-0.002). Adjuvant sorafenib, Barcelona Clinic Liver Classification stage, gender, age and RT dose did not influence response to treatment. Recanalization rate was higher in good PS patients (<em>P</em>-0.019). OS in patients with response to treatment, in those with no response to treatment, in those who are fit but not accrued and in those who are not suitable were 18.4, 9.34, 5.9 and 2.6 months, respectively (<em>P</em>-&lt;0.001). Thirty-six of 139 patients (24%) had radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) [10 (7.2%) had classic RILD &amp; 26 (19%) had non-classic RILD]. Derangement in CP score (CP score change) by more than 2 was seen in 30 (24%) within 2-month period after robotic radiosurgery. Eighteen (13%) had unplanned admissions, two patients required embolization due to fiducial-related bleeding and 20 (14%) had ascites, of which 9 (6%) patients required abdominocentesis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PVT response or recanalization after SBRT is a statistically significant prognostic factor for survival function in HCC-PVT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15479,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973688324000616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims

The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with robotic radiosurgery in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with macrovascular invasion (HCC-PVT).

Materials and methods

Patients with inoperable HCC-PVT, good performance score (PS0-1) and preserved liver function [up to Child-Pugh (CP) B7] were accrued after ethical and scientific committee approval [Clinical trial registry-India (CTRI): 2022/01/050234] for treatment on robotic radiosurgery (M6) and planned with Multiplan (iDMS V2.0). Triple-phase contrast computed tomography (CT) scan was performed for contouring, and gross tumour volume (GTV) included contrast-enhancing mass within main portal vein and adjacent parenchymal disease. Dose prescription was as per risk stratification protocol (22–50 Gy in 5 fractions) while achieving the constraints of mean liver dose <15 Gy, 800 cc liver <8 Gy and the duodenum max of <24 Gy). Response assessment was done at 2 months’ follow-up for recanalization. Patient- and treatment-related factors were evaluated for influence in survival function.

Results

Between Jan 2017 and May 2022, 318 consecutive HCC with PVT patients were screened and 219 patients were accrued [male 92%, CP score: 5–7 90%, mean age: 63 years (38–85 yrs), Cancer of the Liver Italian Program <3: 84 (40%), 3–6117 (56%), infective aetiology 9.5%, performance status (PS): 0–37%; 1–56%]. Among 209 consecutive patients accrued for SBRT treatment (10 patients were excluded after accrual due to ascites and decompensation), 139 were evaluable for response assessment (>2 mo follow-up). At mean follow-up of 12.21 months (standard deviation: 10.66), 88 (63%) patients expired and 51 (36%) were alive. Eighty-two (59%) patients had recanalization of PVT (response), 57 (41%) patients did not recanalize and 28 (17%) had progressive/metastatic disease prior to response evaluation (<2 months). Mean overall survival (OS) in responders and non-responders were 18.4 [standard error (SE): 2.52] and 9.34 month (SE 0.81), respectively (P < 0.001). Mean survival in patients with PS0, PS1 and PS2 were 17, 11.7 and 9.7 months (P = 0.019), respectively. OS in partial recanalization, bland thrombus and complete recanalization was 12.4, 14.1 and 30.3 months, respectively (P-0.002). Adjuvant sorafenib, Barcelona Clinic Liver Classification stage, gender, age and RT dose did not influence response to treatment. Recanalization rate was higher in good PS patients (P-0.019). OS in patients with response to treatment, in those with no response to treatment, in those who are fit but not accrued and in those who are not suitable were 18.4, 9.34, 5.9 and 2.6 months, respectively (P-<0.001). Thirty-six of 139 patients (24%) had radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) [10 (7.2%) had classic RILD & 26 (19%) had non-classic RILD]. Derangement in CP score (CP score change) by more than 2 was seen in 30 (24%) within 2-month period after robotic radiosurgery. Eighteen (13%) had unplanned admissions, two patients required embolization due to fiducial-related bleeding and 20 (14%) had ascites, of which 9 (6%) patients required abdominocentesis.

Conclusion

PVT response or recanalization after SBRT is a statistically significant prognostic factor for survival function in HCC-PVT.

血管浸润性肝细胞癌机器人放射外科手术后门静脉肿瘤血栓反应与生存功能的相关性
背景/目的 本研究旨在对有大血管侵犯的肝细胞癌(HCC-PVT)患者采用机器人放射外科手术进行立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)的前瞻性评估。材料和方法经伦理和科学委员会批准[印度临床试验登记处(CTRI):2022/01/050234],对无法手术的 HCC-PVT 患者进行机器人放射外科治疗(M6),并使用 Multiplan(iDMS V2.0)进行规划。三相造影剂计算机断层扫描(CT)用于勾画轮廓,肿瘤总体积(GTV)包括主门静脉内的造影剂增强肿块和邻近的实质病变。剂量处方按照风险分层方案进行(22-50 Gy,5 次分次),同时达到平均肝脏剂量 15 Gy、800 cc 肝脏 8 Gy 和十二指肠最大剂量 24 Gy 的限制。)在两个月的随访中对再通进行反应评估。对患者和治疗相关因素对生存功能的影响进行了评估。结果2017年1月至2022年5月期间,连续筛查了318例HCC伴PVT患者,共纳入219例患者[男性92%,CP评分:5-7 90%,平均年龄:63岁(38-85岁),肝癌意大利计划<3:84(40%),3-6117(56%),感染性病因9.5%,表现状态(PS):0-37%; 1-56%].在接受 SBRT 治疗的 209 例连续患者中(10 例患者在接受治疗后因腹水和失代偿而被排除),139 例可进行反应评估(随访 2 个月)。平均随访时间为 12.21 个月(标准差:10.66),其中 88 例(63%)患者死亡,51 例(36%)患者存活。82例(59%)患者在进行反应评估(2个月)前PVT再通(反应),57例(41%)患者未再通,28例(17%)患者疾病进展/转移。有反应和无反应患者的平均总生存期(OS)分别为 18.4 个月[标准误差(SE):2.52]和 9.34 个月(SE 0.81)(P <0.001)。PS0、PS1 和 PS2 患者的平均生存期分别为 17、11.7 和 9.7 个月(P = 0.019)。部分再通、无血栓和完全再通患者的OS分别为12.4个月、14.1个月和30.3个月(P-0.002)。辅助索拉非尼、巴塞罗那临床肝分类分期、性别、年龄和 RT 剂量均不影响治疗反应。PS良好的患者再通率更高(P-0.019)。对治疗有反应的患者、对治疗无反应的患者、适合但未入选的患者和不适合的患者的OS分别为18.4个月、9.34个月、5.9个月和2.6个月(P-<0.001)。139 名患者中有 36 人(24%)患有辐射诱发肝病(RILD)[10 人(7.2%)患有典型 RILD & 26 人(19%)患有非典型 RILD]。30例(24%)患者在机器人放射手术后2个月内CP评分变化超过2分。18例(13%)患者出现意外入院,2例患者因靶点相关出血而需要栓塞治疗,20例(14%)患者出现腹水,其中9例(6%)患者需要腹腔穿刺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
64 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信