Редукция трансцендентного как основание имагинативного поворота в неопрагматизме

Yu. S. Magomedova
{"title":"Редукция трансцендентного как основание имагинативного поворота в неопрагматизме","authors":"Yu. S. Magomedova","doi":"10.31312/2310-1245-2023-58-168-187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the analysis of the conceptual and methodological grounds of the imaginative turn made within the framework of neopragmatist discourse. The specific works of R. Rorty, H. Putnam, and M. Johnson are used as examples to present the features of the interpretation of ethics, moral law, and rationalist tradition. The article emphasizes the process of metaphorization of key concepts of Kant's ethics by the neopragmatists. It is argued that for Putnam Kant's ethics has value first of all for its figurative component, the presence of colorful metaphors based on the core concepts of the Judeo-Christian tradition. In adding, it is suggested to critically evaluate the position of Johnson, who deals in detail with Kant's main moral law, the meaning of the categorical imperative. It is established on the basis of the fact that neopragmatists have reduced the transcendental dimension that the crucial role begins to be taken by the sensuality of the empirical subject and imagination as a moral moderator. The author refers to this phenomenon by the term \"imaginative turn\". Citing the works of Russian researcher E.N. Ustyugova the author makes a conclusion that for neopragmatists the human being turns out to be an empirical natural phenomenon, and aesthetics is the only fundament for moral judgments.","PeriodicalId":474109,"journal":{"name":"Studia Culturae","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Culturae","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31312/2310-1245-2023-58-168-187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the conceptual and methodological grounds of the imaginative turn made within the framework of neopragmatist discourse. The specific works of R. Rorty, H. Putnam, and M. Johnson are used as examples to present the features of the interpretation of ethics, moral law, and rationalist tradition. The article emphasizes the process of metaphorization of key concepts of Kant's ethics by the neopragmatists. It is argued that for Putnam Kant's ethics has value first of all for its figurative component, the presence of colorful metaphors based on the core concepts of the Judeo-Christian tradition. In adding, it is suggested to critically evaluate the position of Johnson, who deals in detail with Kant's main moral law, the meaning of the categorical imperative. It is established on the basis of the fact that neopragmatists have reduced the transcendental dimension that the crucial role begins to be taken by the sensuality of the empirical subject and imagination as a moral moderator. The author refers to this phenomenon by the term "imaginative turn". Citing the works of Russian researcher E.N. Ustyugova the author makes a conclusion that for neopragmatists the human being turns out to be an empirical natural phenomenon, and aesthetics is the only fundament for moral judgments.
超越的还原是新实用主义想象力转向的基础
文章专门分析了在新实用主义话语框架内进行想象力转向的概念和方法论基础。文章以罗蒂(R. Rorty)、普特南(H. Putnam)和约翰逊(M. Johnson)的具体作品为例,介绍了对伦理学、道德律和理性主义传统的阐释特点。文章强调了新实用主义者对康德伦理学关键概念的隐喻化过程。文章认为,对普特南而言,康德伦理学的价值首先在于其形象化的成分,即基于犹太-基督教传统核心概念的丰富多彩的隐喻的存在。此外,还建议对约翰逊的立场进行批判性评价,约翰逊详细论述了康德的主要道德法则--绝对命令的含义。约翰逊详细论述了康德的主要道德法则--绝对命令的含义,并在此基础上指出,新实用主义者削弱了超验维度,作为道德调节者的经验主体的感性和想象力开始发挥关键作用。作者将这一现象称为 "想象力转向"。作者引用俄罗斯研究者 E.N. Ustyugova 的著作得出结论:对新实用主义者而言,人变成了一种经验性的自然现象,而美学则是道德判断的唯一基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书