{"title":"Legal Historians of Russian Diaspora in 1920s—1930s","authors":"S. Mikhalchenko, E. V. Tkachenko, Ju. N. Ustinova","doi":"10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-2-430-448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article characterizes the activities and legacy of Russian legal historians who found themselves in emigration in European academic centers in the 1920s. Among these researchers are mentioned M. N. Yassinsky, G. V. Demchenko, F. V. Taranovsky, A. V. Soloviev, and M. V. Shakhmatov. It is shown that prior to the revolution, these scholars taught at various universities in Russia, and in emigration they occupied chairs at higher educational institutions in Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia. The sources of the study include published works by the scholars, memoirs of emigrants, as well as archival materials of various types from storage facilities in Russia and Slovenia, which are being introduced into scholarly circulation for the first time. The analysis of sources revealed that their establishment in emigration was associated with certain difficulties. On the other hand, the experience gained in Russian universities in studying and teaching the history of Russian and Slavic law helped them integrate into the local academic environment. Only Taranovsky and Shakhmatov to some extent adhered to their previous themes in their scholarly activities, while other scholars changed theirs. It is concluded that this was due to a lack of access to sources and the demands of the courses being taught. At the same time, it is emphasized that there was ideological-methodological unity and awareness of belonging to a particular scientific community. The conclusion is drawn that pre-revolutionary schools of legal history continued to exist in the conditions of European emigration. ","PeriodicalId":43602,"journal":{"name":"Nauchnyi Dialog","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauchnyi Dialog","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-2-430-448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article characterizes the activities and legacy of Russian legal historians who found themselves in emigration in European academic centers in the 1920s. Among these researchers are mentioned M. N. Yassinsky, G. V. Demchenko, F. V. Taranovsky, A. V. Soloviev, and M. V. Shakhmatov. It is shown that prior to the revolution, these scholars taught at various universities in Russia, and in emigration they occupied chairs at higher educational institutions in Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia. The sources of the study include published works by the scholars, memoirs of emigrants, as well as archival materials of various types from storage facilities in Russia and Slovenia, which are being introduced into scholarly circulation for the first time. The analysis of sources revealed that their establishment in emigration was associated with certain difficulties. On the other hand, the experience gained in Russian universities in studying and teaching the history of Russian and Slavic law helped them integrate into the local academic environment. Only Taranovsky and Shakhmatov to some extent adhered to their previous themes in their scholarly activities, while other scholars changed theirs. It is concluded that this was due to a lack of access to sources and the demands of the courses being taught. At the same time, it is emphasized that there was ideological-methodological unity and awareness of belonging to a particular scientific community. The conclusion is drawn that pre-revolutionary schools of legal history continued to exist in the conditions of European emigration.
文章介绍了 20 世纪 20 年代移民欧洲学术中心的俄罗斯法律史学家的活动和遗产。这些研究人员包括 M. N. Yassinsky、G. V. Demchenko、F. V. Taranovsky、A. V. Soloviev 和 M. V. Shakhmatov。研究表明,革命前,这些学者在俄罗斯多所大学任教,移民后,他们在南斯拉夫和捷克斯洛伐克的高等教育机构担任教职。研究的资料来源包括这些学者出版的著作、移民回忆录以及俄罗斯和斯洛文尼亚存储设施中的各类档案资料,这些资料是首次进入学术界流通。对资料来源的分析表明,建立移民档案存在一定的困难。另一方面,在俄罗斯大学学习和教授俄罗斯和斯拉夫法律史时积累的经验帮助他们融入了当地的学术环境。只有塔拉诺夫斯基和沙赫马托夫在一定程度上坚持了他们以前的学术活动主题,而其他学者则改变了他们的主题。结论是,这是由于缺乏资料来源和所授课程的要求造成的。同时,还强调了意识形态和方法论的统一,以及对属于特定科学共同体的认识。结论是,革命前的法律史流派在欧洲移民的条件下继续存在。