TEST OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF GENERAL BANKING HEALTH LISTED ON THE INDONESIAN STOCK EXCHANGE 2018-2022 USING THE RGEC METHOD

Moch Aldi Setya Pradhana, Maretha Ika Prajawati
{"title":"TEST OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF GENERAL BANKING HEALTH LISTED ON THE INDONESIAN STOCK EXCHANGE 2018-2022 USING THE RGEC METHOD","authors":"Moch Aldi Setya Pradhana, Maretha Ika Prajawati","doi":"10.29040/ijebar.v8i1.12588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to analyze the comparative level of health of commercial banks using the RGEC method: (Risk profile, Good Cooperative Governance, Earnings and Capital). The use of the RGEC method has been determined by BI (Bank Indonesia) and has been used since 2012 and is stipulated in PBI number 13/1/PBI/2011. The objects used in this research are Islamic commercial banks with a total of 9 banks that have the largest assets and are registered on the BEI (Financial Services Authority) and have annual reports and GCG (Good Corporate Governance) reports. Research that uses quantitative methods uses comparative analysis and uses non-parametric tests. Based on the research results, show that the risk profile variable is assessed using LDR (Loan to Deposit Ratio), the GCG variable comes from PDN Net Open Exchange Position, the Earnings variable uses ROA (Return On Assets), the Capital variable is based on risk profile factors which are measured using CAR (Capital Adequacy). Ratio), Bank health variables are measured using NOM (Net Operating Margin). Variables that have ratios because this research uses ratio values as a comparison. Significant comparison results indicate that there are significant differences in each variable.","PeriodicalId":426165,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR)","volume":" 85","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29040/ijebar.v8i1.12588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the comparative level of health of commercial banks using the RGEC method: (Risk profile, Good Cooperative Governance, Earnings and Capital). The use of the RGEC method has been determined by BI (Bank Indonesia) and has been used since 2012 and is stipulated in PBI number 13/1/PBI/2011. The objects used in this research are Islamic commercial banks with a total of 9 banks that have the largest assets and are registered on the BEI (Financial Services Authority) and have annual reports and GCG (Good Corporate Governance) reports. Research that uses quantitative methods uses comparative analysis and uses non-parametric tests. Based on the research results, show that the risk profile variable is assessed using LDR (Loan to Deposit Ratio), the GCG variable comes from PDN Net Open Exchange Position, the Earnings variable uses ROA (Return On Assets), the Capital variable is based on risk profile factors which are measured using CAR (Capital Adequacy). Ratio), Bank health variables are measured using NOM (Net Operating Margin). Variables that have ratios because this research uses ratio values as a comparison. Significant comparison results indicate that there are significant differences in each variable.
使用 RGEC 方法检验 2018-2022 年在印度尼西亚证券交易所上市的银行业总体健康状况的不同水平
本研究旨在使用 RGEC 方法(风险状况、良好合作治理、盈利和资本)分析商业银行的健康比较水平。印度尼西亚银行(BI)已确定使用 RGEC 方法,该方法自 2012 年起开始使用,并在第 13/1/PBI/2011 号 PBI 中作了规定。本研究使用的对象是伊斯兰商业银行,共有 9 家资产规模最大、在 BEI(金融服务管理局)注册并拥有年度报告和 GCG(良好公司治理)报告的银行。采用定量方法的研究使用比较分析和非参数检验。研究结果表明,风险状况变量采用 LDR(贷存比)评估,GCG 变量来自 PDN 净敞口头寸,收益变量采用 ROA(资产收益率),资本变量基于风险状况因素,采用 CAR(资本充足率)衡量。银行健康变量使用 NOM(净营业利润率)衡量。)有比率的变量,因为本研究使用比率值作为比较。显著的比较结果表明,各变量之间存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信