Strengthening outcome-based education: Capability approach perspective

Givheart C. Dano
{"title":"Strengthening outcome-based education: Capability approach perspective","authors":"Givheart C. Dano","doi":"10.56916/ejip.v3i2.550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the integration of the Capability Approach into Outcome-Based Education (OBE) to enhance the quality and inclusivity of educational practices. While OBE has gained acceptance for its structured approach, critics raise concerns about its potential limitations in fostering holistic development. The Capability Approach, rooted in the work of Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum, offers an alternative perspective, emphasizing human capabilities and freedoms. The paper advocates for a broader view of education, asserting that it should empower learners with skills beyond predefined outcomes. It discusses the theoretical foundations of both approaches, their key principles, and the potential synergies between them. The study employs a comprehensive qualitative methodology, analyzing various sources to enrich the understanding of the research topic. Criticisms of OBE include a perceived narrowing of the curriculum and concerns about its impact on individual excellence. Case studies from different countries highlight challenges and varying outcomes in OBE implementation. The integration of the Capability Approach into OBE is proposed as a transformative avenue, emphasizing the cultivation of capabilities alongside traditional knowledge. Practical implications are outlined, including designing comprehensive learning outcomes, adapting curriculum and pedagogy, and employing diverse assessment methods. The integrated approach is seen as a means to empower learners for personal and societal flourishing, fostering inclusivity and equity in education. The paper concludes that this integration signifies a paradigm shift, redefining education as a transformative force for individual and societal progress.","PeriodicalId":321345,"journal":{"name":"Edukasiana: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edukasiana: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56916/ejip.v3i2.550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the integration of the Capability Approach into Outcome-Based Education (OBE) to enhance the quality and inclusivity of educational practices. While OBE has gained acceptance for its structured approach, critics raise concerns about its potential limitations in fostering holistic development. The Capability Approach, rooted in the work of Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum, offers an alternative perspective, emphasizing human capabilities and freedoms. The paper advocates for a broader view of education, asserting that it should empower learners with skills beyond predefined outcomes. It discusses the theoretical foundations of both approaches, their key principles, and the potential synergies between them. The study employs a comprehensive qualitative methodology, analyzing various sources to enrich the understanding of the research topic. Criticisms of OBE include a perceived narrowing of the curriculum and concerns about its impact on individual excellence. Case studies from different countries highlight challenges and varying outcomes in OBE implementation. The integration of the Capability Approach into OBE is proposed as a transformative avenue, emphasizing the cultivation of capabilities alongside traditional knowledge. Practical implications are outlined, including designing comprehensive learning outcomes, adapting curriculum and pedagogy, and employing diverse assessment methods. The integrated approach is seen as a means to empower learners for personal and societal flourishing, fostering inclusivity and equity in education. The paper concludes that this integration signifies a paradigm shift, redefining education as a transformative force for individual and societal progress.
加强成果教育:能力培养方法视角
本文探讨了如何将能力培养法融入成果导向教育(OBE),以提高教育实践的质量和包容性。尽管 "成果导向教育法 "因其结构化的方法而获得认可,但批评者对其在促进全面发展方面的潜在局限性表示担忧。植根于阿马蒂亚-森(Amartya Sen)和玛莎-努斯鲍姆(Martha Nussbaum)著作的 "能力方法 "提供了另一种视角,强调人的能力和自由。本文主张从更广阔的视角看待教育,认为教育应赋予学习者超越预定结果的技能。本文讨论了这两种方法的理论基础、主要原则以及它们之间潜在的协同作用。研究采用了全面的定性方法,分析了各种资料来源,以丰富对研究课题的理解。对 "开放式教育局 "的批评包括认为其缩小了课程范围,以及担心其对个人卓越性的影响。来自不同国家的案例研究凸显了实施开放式教育局所面临的挑战和取得的不同成果。将 "能力培养法 "融入 "开放式教育 "是一条变革之路,强调在培养传统知识的同时培养能力。概述了实际影响,包括设计全面的学习成果、调整课程和教学法以及采用多样化的评估方法。综合方法被视为增强学习者个人和社会发展能力、促进教育包容性和公平性的一种手段。本文的结论是,这种整合意味着范式的转变,将教育重新定义为促进个人和社会进步的变革力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信