ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT OF KAMPUNG SUSU DINASTY AGROTOURISM IN SIDEM VILLAGE GONDANG SUBDISTRICT TULUNGAGUNG REGENCY

Azki Nur Halimah, Sri Widayanti, Nuriah Yuliati
{"title":"ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT OF KAMPUNG SUSU DINASTY AGROTOURISM IN SIDEM VILLAGE GONDANG SUBDISTRICT TULUNGAGUNG REGENCY","authors":"Azki Nur Halimah, Sri Widayanti, Nuriah Yuliati","doi":"10.29040/ijebar.v8i1.12777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kampung Susu Dinasty (KSD) Agrotourism hasn’t managed their management optimally. This condition has an impact on agrotourism that has a hard time to developing. This management isn’t free of a risk and the possibility of a risk that’s influenced by the quality said management has. This research aims to identifying the operational risk source, analyzing the level of risk, also strategies that can be applied for operational agrotourism risk control. The research method used is qualitative descriptive. The sampling method used is purposive sampling technique with 64 respondents. Data analysis used descriptive analysis, likert scale, Godfrey method, and Flanagan & Norman theory. The result shows that there are 13 operational risks that agrotourism faces with 4 risk categories. The final results of the risk level assessment found that 2 risks were at a low level, 5 risks were at a medium level, 3 risks were at high level, and 3 risks were at an extreme level. From the results of the analysis, 4 main strategies were carried out to minimize losses due to operational risks, namely by transferring risks involving third parties, establishing communication and cooperation with various parties, creating alternative actions, and creating new programs.","PeriodicalId":426165,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR)","volume":"113 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29040/ijebar.v8i1.12777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kampung Susu Dinasty (KSD) Agrotourism hasn’t managed their management optimally. This condition has an impact on agrotourism that has a hard time to developing. This management isn’t free of a risk and the possibility of a risk that’s influenced by the quality said management has. This research aims to identifying the operational risk source, analyzing the level of risk, also strategies that can be applied for operational agrotourism risk control. The research method used is qualitative descriptive. The sampling method used is purposive sampling technique with 64 respondents. Data analysis used descriptive analysis, likert scale, Godfrey method, and Flanagan & Norman theory. The result shows that there are 13 operational risks that agrotourism faces with 4 risk categories. The final results of the risk level assessment found that 2 risks were at a low level, 5 risks were at a medium level, 3 risks were at high level, and 3 risks were at an extreme level. From the results of the analysis, 4 main strategies were carried out to minimize losses due to operational risks, namely by transferring risks involving third parties, establishing communication and cooperation with various parties, creating alternative actions, and creating new programs.
图伦加贡县 SIDEM 村 GONDANG 分区 KAMPUNG SUU DINASTY 农业旅游经营风险管理分析
Kampung Susu Dinasty(KSD)农业旅游公司的管理并不完善。这种情况影响了农业旅游的发展。这种管理并不是没有风险的,风险的可能性受到管理质量的影响。本研究旨在确定运营风险来源,分析风险程度,以及可用于农业旅游运营风险控制的策略。采用的研究方法是定性描述法。采用的抽样方法是目的性抽样技术,共有 64 名受访者。数据分析采用了描述性分析、李克特量表、戈弗雷方法以及弗拉纳根和诺曼理论。结果显示,农业旅游面临着 13 项经营风险,分为 4 个风险类别。风险水平评估的最终结果显示,2 项风险处于低水平,5 项风险处于中等水平,3 项风险处于高水平,3 项风险处于极端水平。根据分析结果,主要采取了 4 种策略来减少运营风险造成的损失,即转移涉及第三方的风险、建立与各方的沟通与合作、制定替代行动、制定新方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信