Mode of Deliveries and Perinatal Outcomes in Prenatal COVID-19 Infections

Supakarn Pongsatonwiwat, B. Chumworathayi, Chatuporn Duangkum
{"title":"Mode of Deliveries and Perinatal Outcomes in Prenatal COVID-19\nInfections","authors":"Supakarn Pongsatonwiwat, B. Chumworathayi, Chatuporn Duangkum","doi":"10.2174/0126667975291928240319083013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RTCOG)\nclinical practice guideline (CPG) does not recommend elective Cesarean Section (CS) in case of\nprenatal maternal COVID-19 infections without obstetric indication. In Thailand, little is known\nabout the mode of deliveries and perinatal outcomes in the mentioned group of patients. Therefore,\nthis study aims to fill the gap in knowledge.\n\n\n\nThe objective of this study was to compare the mode of deliveries and perinatal outcomes\nbetween pregnant women, who were infected with COVID-19 and those who were without COVID-\n19 infection.\n\n\n\nThe retrospective cohort study was based on data retrieved between February 1st and\nMarch 31st, 2023. The primary data was collected between July 1st, 2021, and October 31st, 2022.\nWomen with COVID-19 infection were matched with the non-COVID-19 group in a 1:1 ratio by\ndate at antenatal care (± 7 days) and their gestational age (± 1 week). Comparison of maternal and\nperinatal outcomes was made by using chi-squared, Fisher’s exact, relative risk, and t-test as appropriate\nin STATA software version 10.0.\n\n\n\nA total of 252 participants were recruited in this study, with 126 patients in each group.\nDemographic data between the two groups were comparable except for previous CS. The CS rates in\nthe COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 groups were 46.03% and 30.95%, respectively, with p = 0.009.\nThe significantly increased relative risk of CS in COVID-19 was 1.49 (95%CI, 1.07 to 2.05, p =\n0.02). Eight women out of 126 had undergone CS with a “COVID-19 infection” indication (p =\n0.007). The length of the maternal hospital stay was comparable. No serious maternal complications\nwere observed. Perinatal outcomes were similar among the two groups, except for neonatal jaundice\n(p = 0.029), with no reports of COVID-19 infections in delivery-related personnel.\n\n\n\nPrenatal COVID-19 infections lead to an increase in CS rate, while perinatal morbidities\nwere comparable in both groups, with COVID-19 and non-COVID-19. The RTCOG’s CPG should\nbe modified.\n","PeriodicalId":10815,"journal":{"name":"Coronaviruses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronaviruses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126667975291928240319083013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RTCOG) clinical practice guideline (CPG) does not recommend elective Cesarean Section (CS) in case of prenatal maternal COVID-19 infections without obstetric indication. In Thailand, little is known about the mode of deliveries and perinatal outcomes in the mentioned group of patients. Therefore, this study aims to fill the gap in knowledge. The objective of this study was to compare the mode of deliveries and perinatal outcomes between pregnant women, who were infected with COVID-19 and those who were without COVID- 19 infection. The retrospective cohort study was based on data retrieved between February 1st and March 31st, 2023. The primary data was collected between July 1st, 2021, and October 31st, 2022. Women with COVID-19 infection were matched with the non-COVID-19 group in a 1:1 ratio by date at antenatal care (± 7 days) and their gestational age (± 1 week). Comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes was made by using chi-squared, Fisher’s exact, relative risk, and t-test as appropriate in STATA software version 10.0. A total of 252 participants were recruited in this study, with 126 patients in each group. Demographic data between the two groups were comparable except for previous CS. The CS rates in the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 groups were 46.03% and 30.95%, respectively, with p = 0.009. The significantly increased relative risk of CS in COVID-19 was 1.49 (95%CI, 1.07 to 2.05, p = 0.02). Eight women out of 126 had undergone CS with a “COVID-19 infection” indication (p = 0.007). The length of the maternal hospital stay was comparable. No serious maternal complications were observed. Perinatal outcomes were similar among the two groups, except for neonatal jaundice (p = 0.029), with no reports of COVID-19 infections in delivery-related personnel. Prenatal COVID-19 infections lead to an increase in CS rate, while perinatal morbidities were comparable in both groups, with COVID-19 and non-COVID-19. The RTCOG’s CPG should be modified.
产前 COVID-19 感染的分娩方式和围产期结果
泰国皇家妇产科医学院(RTCOG)的临床实践指南(CPG)不建议无产科指征的产前母体 COVID-19 感染者选择剖腹产(CS)。在泰国,人们对上述患者的分娩方式和围产期结局知之甚少。本研究旨在比较感染 COVID-19 和未感染 COVID-19 的孕妇的分娩方式和围产期结局。根据产前检查日期(± 7 天)和胎龄(± 1 周),将感染 COVID-19 的产妇与未感染 COVID-19 的产妇按 1:1 的比例进行配对。本研究共招募了 252 名参与者,每组各有 126 名患者,除既往 CS 外,两组的人口统计学数据具有可比性。COVID-19组和非COVID-19组的CS率分别为46.03%和30.95%,P=0.009。COVID-19组CS相对风险显著增加,为1.49(95%CI,1.07至2.05,P=0.02)。在 126 名产妇中,有 8 名产妇在 "COVID-19 感染 "指征下进行了 CS(P =0.007)。产妇的住院时间相当。未发现严重的产妇并发症。除了新生儿黄疸(P = 0.029)外,两组围产期结果相似,没有关于分娩相关人员感染 COVID-19 的报道。产前 COVID-19 感染会导致 CS 率上升,而两组围产期发病率(COVID-19 和非 COVID-19 两组)相当。应修改 RTCOG 的 CPG。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信