Analytical Hierarchy Process for Risk Management in the Stabilized Flight Approach - Expert Judgment

Juan Carlos Pedroza, Alejandro Peña, Lina Sepúlveda-Cano, João Vidal Carvalho
{"title":"Analytical Hierarchy Process for Risk Management in the Stabilized Flight Approach - Expert Judgment","authors":"Juan Carlos Pedroza, Alejandro Peña, Lina Sepúlveda-Cano, João Vidal Carvalho","doi":"10.55267/djfm/14419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Destabilised approaches have been the primary cause of fatal accidents during the approach and landing phase, as stated in  (Airbus, 2023). The stabilised approach concept is of great importance for the safe operation of an airline during the approach and landing phases (Acarbay & Kiyak, 2020). The elements highlighted in the approach phases are the runway's dry or contaminated condition and length. In the crew, we analyse their competence, recurrence, and fatigue. Another variable is the type of approach, whether it is precision, non-precision or visual. The external conditions of the aerodrome include obstacles, wind, and wildlife—the type of aircraft, whether light, medium or heavy.  Due to the large amount of qualitative information derived from the pilots' experience about risk management in the approach and landing phases, this paper proposes an Analytic Hierarchy Process model (AHP) for threat characterisation and risk analysis to achieve a stabilised approach. The results show that AHP proposed model establishes a new methodology for identifying potential in-flight risks to air operations based on expert criteria, improving the decisions to land at an alternate airport based on qualitative information from expert pilots in the risk management field.","PeriodicalId":483960,"journal":{"name":"Dutch journal of finance and management","volume":"92 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dutch journal of finance and management","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55267/djfm/14419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Destabilised approaches have been the primary cause of fatal accidents during the approach and landing phase, as stated in  (Airbus, 2023). The stabilised approach concept is of great importance for the safe operation of an airline during the approach and landing phases (Acarbay & Kiyak, 2020). The elements highlighted in the approach phases are the runway's dry or contaminated condition and length. In the crew, we analyse their competence, recurrence, and fatigue. Another variable is the type of approach, whether it is precision, non-precision or visual. The external conditions of the aerodrome include obstacles, wind, and wildlife—the type of aircraft, whether light, medium or heavy.  Due to the large amount of qualitative information derived from the pilots' experience about risk management in the approach and landing phases, this paper proposes an Analytic Hierarchy Process model (AHP) for threat characterisation and risk analysis to achieve a stabilised approach. The results show that AHP proposed model establishes a new methodology for identifying potential in-flight risks to air operations based on expert criteria, improving the decisions to land at an alternate airport based on qualitative information from expert pilots in the risk management field.
稳定飞行方法风险管理的层次分析法--专家判断
空中客车公司,2023 年)指出,在进近和着陆阶段,失稳进近是造成致命事故的主要原因。稳定进近概念对于航空公司在进近和着陆阶段的安全运营至关重要(Acarbay & Kiyak,2020)。进近阶段的重点要素是跑道的干燥或污染状况以及长度。在机组人员方面,我们分析了他们的能力、复发率和疲劳度。另一个变量是进近类型,是精确进近、非精确进近还是目视进近。机场的外部条件包括障碍物、风和野生动物,以及飞机的类型,是轻型、中型还是重型。 由于从飞行员的经验中获得了大量关于进近和着陆阶段风险管理的定性信息,本文提出了一个用于威胁特征描述和风险分析的层次分析法(AHP)模型,以实现稳定进近。研究结果表明,所提出的 AHP 模型建立了一种新的方法,可根据专家标准识别空中运行的潜在飞行风险,并根据风险管理领域专家飞行员提供的定性信息改进在备用机场着陆的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信