Is Gamma Knife Surgery, omitting adjunct WBRT, feasible for patients with 20 or more brain metastases?

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Sherry Liu Jiani, Bengt Karlsson, B. Vellayappan, Yvonne Ang, Wu Peng, T. Yeo, Vincent Nga
{"title":"Is Gamma Knife Surgery, omitting adjunct WBRT, feasible for patients with 20 or more brain metastases?","authors":"Sherry Liu Jiani, Bengt Karlsson, B. Vellayappan, Yvonne Ang, Wu Peng, T. Yeo, Vincent Nga","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdae047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The importance of the number of brain metastases (BM) when deciding between whole brain radiation treatment (WBRT) and radiosurgery is controversial. We hypothesized that the number of BM is of limited importance when deciding radiation strategy, and offered Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) also for selected patients with 20 or more BM.\n \n \n \n The outcome following single session GKS for 75 consecutive patients harboring 20 or more (20+) BM was analyzed. Data was collected both retro- and prospectively.\n \n \n \n The median survival time was nine months. Two grade 3 complications occurred, one resolved and one did not. Sex and clinical condition at the time of GKS (ECOG value) were the only parameters significantly related to survival time. Eighteen patients developed leptomeningeal dissemination with or without distant recurrences (DR), and another 32 patients developed DR a total of 73 times. DR was managed with GKS 24 times, with WBRT three times and with systemic treatment or best supportive care 46 times. The median time to developing DR was unrelated to the number of BM, but significantly longer for patients older than 65 years, as well as for patients with NSCLC.\n \n \n \n GKS is a reasonable treatment option for selected patients with 20 or more BM. It is better to decide the optimal management of post GKS intracranial disease progression once it occurred rather than trying to prevent it by using adjunct WBRT.\n","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":"22 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The importance of the number of brain metastases (BM) when deciding between whole brain radiation treatment (WBRT) and radiosurgery is controversial. We hypothesized that the number of BM is of limited importance when deciding radiation strategy, and offered Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) also for selected patients with 20 or more BM. The outcome following single session GKS for 75 consecutive patients harboring 20 or more (20+) BM was analyzed. Data was collected both retro- and prospectively. The median survival time was nine months. Two grade 3 complications occurred, one resolved and one did not. Sex and clinical condition at the time of GKS (ECOG value) were the only parameters significantly related to survival time. Eighteen patients developed leptomeningeal dissemination with or without distant recurrences (DR), and another 32 patients developed DR a total of 73 times. DR was managed with GKS 24 times, with WBRT three times and with systemic treatment or best supportive care 46 times. The median time to developing DR was unrelated to the number of BM, but significantly longer for patients older than 65 years, as well as for patients with NSCLC. GKS is a reasonable treatment option for selected patients with 20 or more BM. It is better to decide the optimal management of post GKS intracranial disease progression once it occurred rather than trying to prevent it by using adjunct WBRT.
对于有 20 个或 20 个以上脑转移灶的患者来说,伽玛刀手术是否可行?
在决定全脑放射治疗(WBRT)还是放射外科手术时,脑转移瘤(BM)数量的重要性存在争议。我们假设,在决定放射治疗策略时,脑转移灶数量的重要性是有限的,并为选定的 20 个或 20 个以上脑转移灶患者提供伽玛刀手术(GKS)。 我们对 75 名连续携带 20 个或 20 个以上(20+)骨髓瘤的患者进行单次伽玛刀手术后的疗效进行了分析。数据收集既有追溯性也有前瞻性。 中位生存时间为 9 个月。发生了两例 3 级并发症,其中一例已治愈,一例未治愈。性别和 GKS 时的临床状况(ECOG 值)是唯一与存活时间显著相关的参数。18名患者出现了伴有或不伴有远处复发(DR)的脑白质播散,另外32名患者共出现了73次DR。采用GKS治疗DR 24次,WBRT治疗3次,全身治疗或最佳支持治疗46次。发生 DR 的中位时间与 BM 的数量无关,但 65 岁以上的患者和 NSCLC 患者发生 DR 的时间明显更长。 对于骨髓瘤数量达到或超过 20 个的特定患者来说,GKS 是一种合理的治疗方案。对于 GKS 后颅内疾病进展,最好是在其发生后就决定最佳治疗方案,而不是试图通过辅助 WBRT 来防止其发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Electronic Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of electronic materials. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials science, engineering, optics, physics, and chemistry into important applications of electronic materials. Sample research topics that span the journal's scope are inorganic, organic, ionic and polymeric materials with properties that include conducting, semiconducting, superconducting, insulating, dielectric, magnetic, optoelectronic, piezoelectric, ferroelectric and thermoelectric. Indexed/​Abstracted: Web of Science SCIE Scopus CAS INSPEC Portico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信