Challenges in Reducing Bias Using Post-Processing Fairness for Breast Cancer Stage Classification with Deep Learning

IF 1.8 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Algorithms Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.3390/a17040141
Armin Soltan, Peter Washington
{"title":"Challenges in Reducing Bias Using Post-Processing Fairness for Breast Cancer Stage Classification with Deep Learning","authors":"Armin Soltan, Peter Washington","doi":"10.3390/a17040141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Breast cancer is the most common cancer affecting women globally. Despite the significant impact of deep learning models on breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, achieving fairness or equitable outcomes across diverse populations remains a challenge when some demographic groups are underrepresented in the training data. We quantified the bias of models trained to predict breast cancer stage from a dataset consisting of 1000 biopsies from 842 patients provided by AIM-Ahead (Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Consortium to Advance Health Equity and Researcher Diversity). Notably, the majority of data (over 70%) were from White patients. We found that prior to post-processing adjustments, all deep learning models we trained consistently performed better for White patients than for non-White patients. After model calibration, we observed mixed results, with only some models demonstrating improved performance. This work provides a case study of bias in breast cancer medical imaging models and highlights the challenges in using post-processing to attempt to achieve fairness.","PeriodicalId":7636,"journal":{"name":"Algorithms","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Algorithms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/a17040141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer affecting women globally. Despite the significant impact of deep learning models on breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, achieving fairness or equitable outcomes across diverse populations remains a challenge when some demographic groups are underrepresented in the training data. We quantified the bias of models trained to predict breast cancer stage from a dataset consisting of 1000 biopsies from 842 patients provided by AIM-Ahead (Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Consortium to Advance Health Equity and Researcher Diversity). Notably, the majority of data (over 70%) were from White patients. We found that prior to post-processing adjustments, all deep learning models we trained consistently performed better for White patients than for non-White patients. After model calibration, we observed mixed results, with only some models demonstrating improved performance. This work provides a case study of bias in breast cancer medical imaging models and highlights the challenges in using post-processing to attempt to achieve fairness.
利用深度学习的后处理公平性减少乳腺癌分期分类中的偏差所面临的挑战
乳腺癌是全球女性最常见的癌症。尽管深度学习模型对乳腺癌的诊断和治疗产生了重大影响,但当某些人口群体在训练数据中代表性不足时,在不同人群中实现公平或公正的结果仍然是一项挑战。我们从 AIM-Ahead(促进健康公平和研究人员多样性的人工智能/机器学习联盟)提供的数据集(包括来自 842 名患者的 1000 份活检样本)中量化了为预测乳腺癌分期而训练的模型的偏差。值得注意的是,大部分数据(超过 70%)来自白人患者。我们发现,在进行后处理调整之前,我们训练的所有深度学习模型对白人患者的表现始终优于对非白人患者的表现。在模型校准后,我们观察到的结果好坏参半,只有一些模型的性能有所提高。这项工作提供了乳腺癌医学成像模型偏差的案例研究,并强调了使用后处理试图实现公平性所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Algorithms
Algorithms Mathematics-Numerical Analysis
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
394
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信