A multi-criteria decision-making method for thermal insulation material selection in nZEB level questioned affordable multifamily housings

IF 1.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
B. Yılmaz, Seden Acun Özgünler, Y. Yılmaz
{"title":"A multi-criteria decision-making method for thermal insulation material selection in nZEB level questioned affordable multifamily housings","authors":"B. Yılmaz, Seden Acun Özgünler, Y. Yılmaz","doi":"10.1177/17442591241238440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An affordable multifamily housing building archetype project was researched to improve the building envelope’s thermo-physical performance based on thermal insulation configurations to optimize the energy use, life-cycle cost, environmental impact, and thermal comfort with questioning nZEB concept. Five thermal insulation materials as extruded polystyrene (XPS), expanded polystyrene (EPS), rockwool (RW), glass wool (GW), and cellular glass (CG), were studied with four> attribute variations (thermal comfort, density, embodied carbon, and embodied energy) and five thickness variations (0.04, 0.08, 0.12, 0.16, 0.20 m). A total of 100 alternative scenarios> were obtained for the decision-making process, with four performance criteria to be evaluated in terms of energy, cost, thermal comfort, and environmental impact. Equal weights method (EWM), weighted sum method (WSM), and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) were examined for the multi-criteria decision-making among 46 scenariosvel. The analysis beyond the cost-optimal energy efficiency level, which varies between 64.89 and 72.62 kWh/m2a for primary energy use with a potential 10% further reduction, ensures the European Commission’s recommendations that target 50–70 kWh/m2a of primary energy use for housings in the continental climate to achieve nZEB. The best scenarios cover significantly the XPS at the head due to lover investment costs, where RW, GW, and EPS are followed among the best 10 scenarios, respectively. Besides, AHP provides a more effective distribution of weighting factors than the WSM where the best scenarios of the AHP covers 12 cm thermal insulation alternatives by balancing the investment costs and energy efficiency levels. The paper provides insight into thermal insulation material selection while searching for the advantages and priorities of thermal insulation materials’ attributes beyond the cost-optimal energy efficiency level to reach the nZEB range.","PeriodicalId":50249,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Building Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Building Physics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17442591241238440","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An affordable multifamily housing building archetype project was researched to improve the building envelope’s thermo-physical performance based on thermal insulation configurations to optimize the energy use, life-cycle cost, environmental impact, and thermal comfort with questioning nZEB concept. Five thermal insulation materials as extruded polystyrene (XPS), expanded polystyrene (EPS), rockwool (RW), glass wool (GW), and cellular glass (CG), were studied with four> attribute variations (thermal comfort, density, embodied carbon, and embodied energy) and five thickness variations (0.04, 0.08, 0.12, 0.16, 0.20 m). A total of 100 alternative scenarios> were obtained for the decision-making process, with four performance criteria to be evaluated in terms of energy, cost, thermal comfort, and environmental impact. Equal weights method (EWM), weighted sum method (WSM), and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) were examined for the multi-criteria decision-making among 46 scenariosvel. The analysis beyond the cost-optimal energy efficiency level, which varies between 64.89 and 72.62 kWh/m2a for primary energy use with a potential 10% further reduction, ensures the European Commission’s recommendations that target 50–70 kWh/m2a of primary energy use for housings in the continental climate to achieve nZEB. The best scenarios cover significantly the XPS at the head due to lover investment costs, where RW, GW, and EPS are followed among the best 10 scenarios, respectively. Besides, AHP provides a more effective distribution of weighting factors than the WSM where the best scenarios of the AHP covers 12 cm thermal insulation alternatives by balancing the investment costs and energy efficiency levels. The paper provides insight into thermal insulation material selection while searching for the advantages and priorities of thermal insulation materials’ attributes beyond the cost-optimal energy efficiency level to reach the nZEB range.
nZEB 级问题经济适用多户住宅保温材料选择的多标准决策方法
对一个经济适用的多户住宅建筑原型项目进行了研究,目的是根据隔热配置来改善建筑围护结构的热物理性能,从而优化能源使用、生命周期成本、环境影响和热舒适度,并对 nZEB 概念提出质疑。研究了挤塑聚苯乙烯 (XPS)、发泡聚苯乙烯 (EPS)、岩棉 (RW)、玻璃棉 (GW) 和蜂窝玻璃 (CG) 五种隔热材料的四种属性变化(热舒适度、密度、体现碳和体现能)和五种厚度变化(0.04、0.08、0.12、0.16 和 0.20 米)。在决策过程中,共获得了 100 个备选方案>,从能源、成本、热舒适度和环境影响四个方面对性能标准进行评估。在 46 个方案中,对等权法(EWM)、加权和法(WSM)和层次分析法(AHP)进行了多标准决策检验。分析结果超出了成本最优能效水平,即一次能源使用量介于 64.89 和 72.62 kWh/m2a 之间,并有可能进一步降低 10%,这确保了欧洲委员会的建议,即在大陆性气候条件下,以 50-70 kWh/m2a 的一次能源使用量为目标,实现 nZEB。由于投资成本较低,最佳方案中的 XPS 排在首位,在最佳的 10 个方案中,RW、GW 和 EPS 分别排在其后。此外,与 WSM 相比,AHP 提供了更有效的权重因子分配,通过平衡投资成本和能效水平,AHP 的最佳方案涵盖了 12 cm 的隔热材料。本文为保温材料的选择提供了启示,同时在成本最优能效水平之外寻找保温材料属性的优势和优先级,以达到 nZEB 的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Building Physics
Journal of Building Physics 工程技术-结构与建筑技术
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
15.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Building Physics (J. Bldg. Phys) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes a high quality research and state of the art “integrated” papers to promote scientifically thorough advancement of all the areas of non-structural performance of a building and particularly in heat, air, moisture transfer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信