Serial cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for guidance of therapy management in patients treated with anakinra due to recurrent pericarditis

F. Bianco, Valentina Bucciarelli, F. Coretti, Serena Cataldi, Francesca Damadei, Elena Raffaelli, N. Schicchi, Alessia Omenetti, Bianca Lattanzi, Emanuela Berton, F. C. Surace, A. Baldinelli, Luciana Breda, Salvatore Cazzato, C. Catassi, A. Dello Russo, Sabina Gallina
{"title":"Serial cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for guidance of therapy management in patients treated with anakinra due to recurrent pericarditis","authors":"F. Bianco, Valentina Bucciarelli, F. Coretti, Serena Cataldi, Francesca Damadei, Elena Raffaelli, N. Schicchi, Alessia Omenetti, Bianca Lattanzi, Emanuela Berton, F. C. Surace, A. Baldinelli, Luciana Breda, Salvatore Cazzato, C. Catassi, A. Dello Russo, Sabina Gallina","doi":"10.1093/ehjimp/qyae019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n To determine the utility of serial cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for guidance of therapy management in patients treated with anakinra due to recurrent pericarditis (RP), compared with c-reactive protein (CRP) assay alone.\n \n \n \n In 2018-21, we enrolled 18 (14.5±1.8-year-old, 72% males) consecutive RP patients treated with anakinra (100 mg/day in patients ≥ 18 years old; 2 mg/kg/day < 18 years old) due to RP corticosteroid-dependent, or not responsive to colchicine or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. After hospitalization, they were 1:1 randomized to CMR [no pericardial edema and/or late gadolinium enchantment (LGE)] or CRP (<0.6 mg/dL). Tests were repeated every 3-months until negative to halve the anakinra dosage and cessation. The idiopathic etiology was the most prevalent (n=8, 44%), followed by postpericardiotomy (n=6, 33%). After a median treatment period of 8.7±3.6 months, CRP-guided RP patients experienced more recurrences than CMR-guided ones (6 vs. 1, P=0.016), with the worst prognosis in terms of recurrences (Log-rank, P= 0.025) and significant increased time of treatment (12.7±2 vs. 16.1±3.4 months, P=0.019). In a multivariable exploratory Cox regression model, the number of previous recurrences and the idiopathic etiology were independent predictors of RP during the anakinra treatment. New recurrences were subsequently directed to CMR imaging, and therapy modified according to the LGE/edema trend. After 1-year follow-up, no further recurrence was detected.\n \n \n \n Among patients with RP and treated with anakinra, serial CMR imaging of the pericardium can be utilized as an imaging biomarker, more informative for therapy duration than the solely CRP assessment.\n \n \n \n NCT06071156\n","PeriodicalId":508944,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice","volume":"2 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyae019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To determine the utility of serial cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for guidance of therapy management in patients treated with anakinra due to recurrent pericarditis (RP), compared with c-reactive protein (CRP) assay alone. In 2018-21, we enrolled 18 (14.5±1.8-year-old, 72% males) consecutive RP patients treated with anakinra (100 mg/day in patients ≥ 18 years old; 2 mg/kg/day < 18 years old) due to RP corticosteroid-dependent, or not responsive to colchicine or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. After hospitalization, they were 1:1 randomized to CMR [no pericardial edema and/or late gadolinium enchantment (LGE)] or CRP (<0.6 mg/dL). Tests were repeated every 3-months until negative to halve the anakinra dosage and cessation. The idiopathic etiology was the most prevalent (n=8, 44%), followed by postpericardiotomy (n=6, 33%). After a median treatment period of 8.7±3.6 months, CRP-guided RP patients experienced more recurrences than CMR-guided ones (6 vs. 1, P=0.016), with the worst prognosis in terms of recurrences (Log-rank, P= 0.025) and significant increased time of treatment (12.7±2 vs. 16.1±3.4 months, P=0.019). In a multivariable exploratory Cox regression model, the number of previous recurrences and the idiopathic etiology were independent predictors of RP during the anakinra treatment. New recurrences were subsequently directed to CMR imaging, and therapy modified according to the LGE/edema trend. After 1-year follow-up, no further recurrence was detected. Among patients with RP and treated with anakinra, serial CMR imaging of the pericardium can be utilized as an imaging biomarker, more informative for therapy duration than the solely CRP assessment. NCT06071156
连续心脏磁共振成像用于指导因复发性心包炎而接受阿纳金拉治疗的患者的治疗管理
目的:与单独检测c反应蛋白(CRP)相比,确定连续心脏磁共振(CMR)成像在指导因复发性心包炎(RP)而接受阿纳金拉治疗的患者的治疗管理方面的效用。 2018-21年,我们连续收治了18例(14.5±1.8岁,72%为男性)因RP皮质激素依赖或对秋水仙碱或非类固醇抗炎药物无效而接受阿纳金拉治疗的RP患者(≥18岁患者100 mg/天;<18岁患者2 mg/kg/天)。住院后,他们按 1:1 的比例随机接受 CMR [无心包水肿和/或晚期钆中毒(LGE)] 或 CRP(<0.6 mg/dL)检查。每 3 个月重复一次检测,直到检测结果为阴性,才将阿纳金拉剂量减半并停药。特发性病因最常见(8 例,44%),其次是心包切开术后(6 例,33%)。中位治疗期为(8.7±3.6)个月后,CRP引导的RP患者比CMR引导的患者复发更多(6 vs. 1,P=0.016),复发预后最差(Log-rank,P= 0.025),治疗时间显著延长(12.7±2 vs. 16.1±3.4个月,P=0.019)。在多变量探索性 Cox 回归模型中,既往复发次数和特发性病因是阿纳金拉治疗期间 RP 的独立预测因素。新的复发病例随后被引导进行CMR成像,并根据LGE/水肿趋势调整治疗方案。随访一年后,未再发现复发。 在接受阿纳金拉治疗的RP患者中,心包的连续CMR成像可作为一种成像生物标志物,比单纯的CRP评估对疗程更有参考价值。 NCT06071156
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信