Broiler production from the perspective of emergy analysis - environmental impact scenarios

A. Kuczuk, J. Pospolita
{"title":"Broiler production from the perspective of emergy analysis - environmental impact scenarios","authors":"A. Kuczuk, J. Pospolita","doi":"10.34659/eis.2024.88.1.751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Poultry meat consumption is a significant element in Poland's overall food consumption. Economic considerations mean that both nationally and globally, conventional intensive rearing dominates. Nevertheless, environmental and health aspects or the will to treat animals humanely make pro-environmental rearing systems increasingly common. The purpose of this article is an environmental analysis of an example farm engaged in intensive rearing of slaughtered poultry (so-called baseline production). For the analysed production, the following scenarios of changes were proposed: (a) conventional rearing based on the use of own fodder, and (b) organic rearing using free range and own organic fodder. An emergy approach was applied in this analysis. Comparison of different production systems using emergy analysis made it possible to show the scale of environmental resource commitment for baseline and scenario-based productions, and to determine the amount of renewable and non-renewable emergy consumed per unit of production. Through the use of selected emergy indicators, e.g.: Environmental Loading Ratio (ELR), Emergy Yield Ratio (EYR), the environmental impact for each case was determined. For the ecological system scenario, the need to change production parameters (stocking rate, maximum poultry house area, free range) was taken into account. The results of the emergy-based indicators showed that the baseline production places the greatest burden on the environment and is the least sustainable. The organic system is the opposite; however, due to production limitations and the lower production efficiency achieved, it may not be economically viable to orient a farm exclusively to the organic system. In an environmental assessment, the information obtained can provide valuable guidance to agricultural producers. They can help make informed decisions on natural resource management to achieve environmental security. The results are also important for political decision-makers in creating policies for more sustainable agricultural production. The results obtained are discussed, pointing out the importance of the analysis used mainly from an environmental point of view.","PeriodicalId":509109,"journal":{"name":"Economics and Environment","volume":"63 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2024.88.1.751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Poultry meat consumption is a significant element in Poland's overall food consumption. Economic considerations mean that both nationally and globally, conventional intensive rearing dominates. Nevertheless, environmental and health aspects or the will to treat animals humanely make pro-environmental rearing systems increasingly common. The purpose of this article is an environmental analysis of an example farm engaged in intensive rearing of slaughtered poultry (so-called baseline production). For the analysed production, the following scenarios of changes were proposed: (a) conventional rearing based on the use of own fodder, and (b) organic rearing using free range and own organic fodder. An emergy approach was applied in this analysis. Comparison of different production systems using emergy analysis made it possible to show the scale of environmental resource commitment for baseline and scenario-based productions, and to determine the amount of renewable and non-renewable emergy consumed per unit of production. Through the use of selected emergy indicators, e.g.: Environmental Loading Ratio (ELR), Emergy Yield Ratio (EYR), the environmental impact for each case was determined. For the ecological system scenario, the need to change production parameters (stocking rate, maximum poultry house area, free range) was taken into account. The results of the emergy-based indicators showed that the baseline production places the greatest burden on the environment and is the least sustainable. The organic system is the opposite; however, due to production limitations and the lower production efficiency achieved, it may not be economically viable to orient a farm exclusively to the organic system. In an environmental assessment, the information obtained can provide valuable guidance to agricultural producers. They can help make informed decisions on natural resource management to achieve environmental security. The results are also important for political decision-makers in creating policies for more sustainable agricultural production. The results obtained are discussed, pointing out the importance of the analysis used mainly from an environmental point of view.
从应急分析角度看肉鸡生产--环境影响方案
禽肉消费是波兰总体食品消费的重要组成部分。出于经济方面的考虑,无论是在国内还是在全球范围内,传统的集约化饲养都占据着主导地位。然而,环境和健康方面的因素或人道对待动物的意愿使得亲环境饲养系统越来越普遍。本文的目的是对一个从事家禽屠宰集约化饲养(所谓的基准生产)的农场进行环境分析。针对所分析的生产,提出了以下变革方案:(a) 使用自产饲料的传统饲养,以及 (b) 使用自由放养和自产有机饲料的有机饲养。该分析采用了应急方法。利用应急分析对不同的生产系统进行比较,可以显示基线生产和情景生产的环境资源承诺规模,并确定每单位生产所消耗的可再生和不可再生应急能源的数量。通过使用选定的应急指标,例如环境负荷比(ELR)、应急产出比(EYR),确定每种情况对环境的影响。在生态系统方案中,考虑了改变生产参数(放养率、最大禽舍面积、自由放养)的需要。基于应急指标的结果表明,基线生产对环境造成的负担最大,可持续性最差。而有机系统则恰恰相反;不过,由于生产限制和生产效率较低,完全采用有机系统可能在经济上并不可行。在环境评估中,获得的信息可以为农业生产者提供宝贵的指导。这些信息有助于在自然资源管理方面做出明智的决定,以实现环境安全。评估结果对政治决策者制定更可持续的农业生产政策也很重要。本文讨论了所获得的结果,指出了主要从环境角度进行分析的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信