Familial Reputation, Bias and Impartial Arbitrators “on the Field”*

Liam J. A. Lenten, A. Barake, Mark F. Stewart
{"title":"Familial Reputation, Bias and Impartial Arbitrators “on the Field”*","authors":"Liam J. A. Lenten, A. Barake, Mark F. Stewart","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Those with intra‐organisational familial links often advance more quickly due to nepotism. We harness a large database from a natural setting relating to a specific paternal mechanism in professional sport; with our results suggesting that when external arbitrators are utilised as a tool to ensure fairness of assessments, there is effectively no evidence of performance evaluation bias in favour of subjects with the internal benefit of family reputation. This suggests that impartial assessors may be an appropriate method of safeguarding against nepotism within organisations. However, there is still some weak evidence that the influence of the agent's family name can itself still make a difference.","PeriodicalId":340385,"journal":{"name":"Economic Papers: A journal of applied economics and policy","volume":"91 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Papers: A journal of applied economics and policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-3441.12413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Those with intra‐organisational familial links often advance more quickly due to nepotism. We harness a large database from a natural setting relating to a specific paternal mechanism in professional sport; with our results suggesting that when external arbitrators are utilised as a tool to ensure fairness of assessments, there is effectively no evidence of performance evaluation bias in favour of subjects with the internal benefit of family reputation. This suggests that impartial assessors may be an appropriate method of safeguarding against nepotism within organisations. However, there is still some weak evidence that the influence of the agent's family name can itself still make a difference.
家族声誉、偏见和 "在现场 "的公正仲裁员 *
由于裙带关系,那些与组织内部有亲属关系的人往往晋升更快。我们从自然环境中获取了一个大型数据库,该数据库与职业体育中特定的父系机制有关;我们的结果表明,当利用外部仲裁员作为确保评估公平性的工具时,实际上没有证据表明绩效评估偏向于具有家庭声誉内部利益的对象。这表明,公正的评估员可能是防止组织内部裙带关系的一种适当方法。不过,仍有一些微弱的证据表明,代理人姓氏的影响本身仍会造成差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信