Deprivation of a person’s academic degree: on the issue of uncertainty of some legal consequences

Konstantin V. Cherkasov
{"title":"Deprivation of a person’s academic degree: on the issue of uncertainty of some legal consequences","authors":"Konstantin V. Cherkasov","doi":"10.34216/1998-0817-2023-29-4-191-194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of the institution of deprivation of an academic degree in Russia. Particular attention is paid to the negative consequences of deprivation of an academic degree both for the person itself – for the former holder of an academic degree, and for other subjects participating in the process of defending the dissertation. Regulatory gaps in this area have been identified, as well as insufficient specificity of current legal regulations. The problematic issues of possible deprivation of Professor academic title of a scientific supervisor (scientific consultant) of a person deprived of an academic degree are identified. In this context, various solution options are considered. It is argued that if regulatory or local acts of an organisation establish requirements for having an academic degree (its specific level) to fill a certain position, and if a person fills this position on this basis only to be subsequently deprived of an academic degree, then at the same time it is deprived of the right to fill the corresponding position. The need to clarify the existing wording on the responsibility of opponents and the leading organisation that had given feedback on the dissertation of the person later deprived of the academic degree, is substantiated. It is noted that the current legal regulations do not make the level of adverse consequences dependent on the basis for deprivation of an academic degree, and they neither provide for the liability of subjects who had given a positive review of the dissertation abstract of the person who was subsequently deprived of the academic degree. Proposals and recommendations in the area under study are formulated in terms of optimising the current legislation in general and improving the requirements of the Regulations on the awarding of academic degrees, in particular.","PeriodicalId":326235,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Kostroma State University","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Kostroma State University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2023-29-4-191-194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the institution of deprivation of an academic degree in Russia. Particular attention is paid to the negative consequences of deprivation of an academic degree both for the person itself – for the former holder of an academic degree, and for other subjects participating in the process of defending the dissertation. Regulatory gaps in this area have been identified, as well as insufficient specificity of current legal regulations. The problematic issues of possible deprivation of Professor academic title of a scientific supervisor (scientific consultant) of a person deprived of an academic degree are identified. In this context, various solution options are considered. It is argued that if regulatory or local acts of an organisation establish requirements for having an academic degree (its specific level) to fill a certain position, and if a person fills this position on this basis only to be subsequently deprived of an academic degree, then at the same time it is deprived of the right to fill the corresponding position. The need to clarify the existing wording on the responsibility of opponents and the leading organisation that had given feedback on the dissertation of the person later deprived of the academic degree, is substantiated. It is noted that the current legal regulations do not make the level of adverse consequences dependent on the basis for deprivation of an academic degree, and they neither provide for the liability of subjects who had given a positive review of the dissertation abstract of the person who was subsequently deprived of the academic degree. Proposals and recommendations in the area under study are formulated in terms of optimising the current legislation in general and improving the requirements of the Regulations on the awarding of academic degrees, in particular.
剥夺一个人的学位:关于某些法律后果的不确定性问题
本文专门研究了俄罗斯的学位剥夺制度。文章特别关注了剥夺学位对个人--前学位持有者和参与论文答辩过程的其他主体--的负面影响。已发现该领域存在监管空白,现行法律法规也不够具体。确定了被剥夺学术学位者的科学导师(科学顾问)可能被剥夺教授学术头衔的问题。在此背景下,考虑了各种解决方案。有观点认为,如果一个组织的监管或地方法规规定了担任某个职位必须具备学术学位(其具体水平)的要求,如果一个人在此基础上担任了该职位,但随后被剥夺了学术学位,那么他同时也被剥夺了担任相应职位的权利。因此,有必要对反对者的责任以及对后来被剥夺学位者的学位论文提供反馈意见的领导机构的责任的现有措辞进行澄清。需要指出的是,现行法律法规并未规定不利后果的程度取决于剥夺学位的依据,也未规定对后来被 剥夺学位者的论文摘要给予积极评价的主体的责任。在本研究领域提出的提议和建议从总体上优化了现行立法,特别是改进了《学位授予条例》 的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信