Cannabis oil extracts for chronic pain: what else can be learned from another structured prospective cohort?

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
D. Pud, S. Aamar, Bareket Schiff-Keren, Roee Sheinfeld, Silviu Brill, Dror Robinson, Yaakov Fogelman, George Habib, Haggai Sharon, Howard Amital, Boris Boltyansky, S. Haroutounian, Elon Eisenberg
{"title":"Cannabis oil extracts for chronic pain: what else can be learned from another structured prospective cohort?","authors":"D. Pud, S. Aamar, Bareket Schiff-Keren, Roee Sheinfeld, Silviu Brill, Dror Robinson, Yaakov Fogelman, George Habib, Haggai Sharon, Howard Amital, Boris Boltyansky, S. Haroutounian, Elon Eisenberg","doi":"10.1097/pr9.0000000000001143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The use of medicinal cannabis for managing pain expands, although its efficacy and safety have not been fully established through randomized controlled trials.\n \n \n \n This structured, prospective questionnaire-based cohort was aimed to assess long-term effectiveness and safety of cannabis oil extracts in patients with chronic pain.\n \n \n \n Adult Israeli patients licensed to use cannabis oil extracts for chronic pain were followed prospectively for 6 months. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline in average weekly pain intensity, and secondary outcomes were changes in related symptoms and quality of life, recorded before treatment initiation and 1, 3, and 6 months thereafter. Generalized linear mixed model was used to analyze changes over time. In addition, “responders” (≥30% reduction in weekly pain at any time point) were identified.\n \n \n \n The study included 218 patients at baseline, and 188, 154, and 131 at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. At 6 months, the mean daily doses of cannabidiol and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol were 22.4 ± 24.0 mg and 20.8 ± 30.1 mg, respectively. Pain decreased from 7.9 ± 1.7 at baseline to 6.6 ± 2.2 at 6 months (F(3,450) = 26.22, P < 0.0001). Most secondary parameters also significantly improved. Of the 218 participants, 24% were “responders” but could not be identified by baseline parameters. “Responders” exhibited higher improvement in secondary outcomes. Adverse events were common but mostly nonserious.\n \n \n \n This prospective cohort demonstrated a modest overall long-term improvement in chronic pain and related symptoms and a reasonable safety profile with the use of relatively low doses of individually titrated Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol.\n","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pr9.0000000000001143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of medicinal cannabis for managing pain expands, although its efficacy and safety have not been fully established through randomized controlled trials. This structured, prospective questionnaire-based cohort was aimed to assess long-term effectiveness and safety of cannabis oil extracts in patients with chronic pain. Adult Israeli patients licensed to use cannabis oil extracts for chronic pain were followed prospectively for 6 months. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline in average weekly pain intensity, and secondary outcomes were changes in related symptoms and quality of life, recorded before treatment initiation and 1, 3, and 6 months thereafter. Generalized linear mixed model was used to analyze changes over time. In addition, “responders” (≥30% reduction in weekly pain at any time point) were identified. The study included 218 patients at baseline, and 188, 154, and 131 at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. At 6 months, the mean daily doses of cannabidiol and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol were 22.4 ± 24.0 mg and 20.8 ± 30.1 mg, respectively. Pain decreased from 7.9 ± 1.7 at baseline to 6.6 ± 2.2 at 6 months (F(3,450) = 26.22, P < 0.0001). Most secondary parameters also significantly improved. Of the 218 participants, 24% were “responders” but could not be identified by baseline parameters. “Responders” exhibited higher improvement in secondary outcomes. Adverse events were common but mostly nonserious. This prospective cohort demonstrated a modest overall long-term improvement in chronic pain and related symptoms and a reasonable safety profile with the use of relatively low doses of individually titrated Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol.
大麻油提取物治疗慢性疼痛:从另一个结构化前瞻性队列中还能学到什么?
尽管其疗效和安全性尚未通过随机对照试验得到充分证实,但使用药用大麻治疗疼痛的范围却在不断扩大。 这项基于调查问卷的结构化前瞻性队列研究旨在评估大麻油提取物对慢性疼痛患者的长期有效性和安全性。 对获准使用大麻油提取物治疗慢性疼痛的以色列成年患者进行了为期 6 个月的前瞻性跟踪调查。主要结果指标是每周平均疼痛强度与基线相比的变化,次要结果指标是相关症状和生活质量的变化,记录时间为开始治疗前及其后的 1、3 和 6 个月。采用广义线性混合模型分析随时间的变化。此外,还确定了 "应答者"(在任何时间点每周疼痛减轻≥30%)。 研究共纳入了 218 名基线患者,1、3 和 6 个月时分别纳入了 188、154 和 131 名患者。6 个月时,大麻二酚和Δ9-四氢大麻酚的平均日剂量分别为 22.4 ± 24.0 毫克和 20.8 ± 30.1 毫克。疼痛从基线时的 7.9 ± 1.7 减轻到 6 个月时的 6.6 ± 2.2(F(3,450) = 26.22,P < 0.0001)。大多数次要参数也有明显改善。在 218 名参与者中,有 24% 是 "应答者",但无法通过基线参数来确定。"应答者 "的次要结果改善程度更高。不良反应很常见,但大多不严重。 这项前瞻性队列研究表明,使用相对低剂量的单独滴定Δ9-四氢大麻酚和大麻二酚,慢性疼痛和相关症状总体上得到了适度的长期改善,安全性也比较合理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信