Arterial stiffness assessment in coronary microvascular dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: An initial report from the WISE-CVD continuation study

IF 1.3 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
P. Rezaeian , C.L. Shufelt , J. Wei , C. Pacheco , G. Cook-Wiens , D. Berman , B. Tamarappoo , L.E. Thomson , M.D. Nelson , R.D. Anderson , J. Petersen , E.M. Handberg , C.J. Pepine , C.N. Bairey Merz
{"title":"Arterial stiffness assessment in coronary microvascular dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: An initial report from the WISE-CVD continuation study","authors":"P. Rezaeian ,&nbsp;C.L. Shufelt ,&nbsp;J. Wei ,&nbsp;C. Pacheco ,&nbsp;G. Cook-Wiens ,&nbsp;D. Berman ,&nbsp;B. Tamarappoo ,&nbsp;L.E. Thomson ,&nbsp;M.D. Nelson ,&nbsp;R.D. Anderson ,&nbsp;J. Petersen ,&nbsp;E.M. Handberg ,&nbsp;C.J. Pepine ,&nbsp;C.N. Bairey Merz","doi":"10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is the most common cardiac complication in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), yet its underlying pathways remain unclear. Aortic pulse-wave velocity (aPWV) is an indicator of large artery stiffness and a predictor for cardiovascular disease. However, aPWV in CMD and HFpEF is not well characterized and may provide understanding of disease progression.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Among participants without obstructive coronary artery disease, we evaluated 51 women with suspected CMD and 20 women and men with evidence of HFpEF. All participants underwent aPWV measurement (SphygmoCor, Atcor Medical) with higher aPWV indicating greater vascular stiffness. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) assessed left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, CMD via myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI), and ventricular remodeling via LV mass-volume ratio. . Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Pearson correlations and linear regression analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared to the suspected CMD group, the HFpEF participants were older (65 ± 12 vs 56 ± 11 yrs., <em>p</em> = 0.002) had higher BMI (31.0 ± 4.3 vs 27.8 ± 6.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, <em>p</em> = 0.013), higher aPWV (10.5 ± 2.0 vs 8.0 ± 1.6 m/s, <em>p</em> = 0.05) and lower MPRI (1.5 ± 0.3 vs1.8 ± 0.3, <em>p</em> = 0.02), but not remodeling. In a model adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors, the HFpEF group had a lower LVEF (estimate −4.78, <em>p</em> = 0.0437) than the suspected CMD group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>HFpEF participants exhibit greater arterial stiffness and lower myocardial perfusion reserve, with lower LVEF albeit not remodeling, compared to suspected CMD participants. These findings suggest arterial stiffness may contribute to progression from CMD to HFpEF. Prospective work is needed and ongoing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72158,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100390"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602224000338/pdfft?md5=d61c852abf291d34915320d7569ef9aa&pid=1-s2.0-S2666602224000338-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602224000338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is the most common cardiac complication in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), yet its underlying pathways remain unclear. Aortic pulse-wave velocity (aPWV) is an indicator of large artery stiffness and a predictor for cardiovascular disease. However, aPWV in CMD and HFpEF is not well characterized and may provide understanding of disease progression.

Methods

Among participants without obstructive coronary artery disease, we evaluated 51 women with suspected CMD and 20 women and men with evidence of HFpEF. All participants underwent aPWV measurement (SphygmoCor, Atcor Medical) with higher aPWV indicating greater vascular stiffness. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) assessed left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, CMD via myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI), and ventricular remodeling via LV mass-volume ratio. . Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Pearson correlations and linear regression analysis.

Results

Compared to the suspected CMD group, the HFpEF participants were older (65 ± 12 vs 56 ± 11 yrs., p = 0.002) had higher BMI (31.0 ± 4.3 vs 27.8 ± 6.7 kg/m2, p = 0.013), higher aPWV (10.5 ± 2.0 vs 8.0 ± 1.6 m/s, p = 0.05) and lower MPRI (1.5 ± 0.3 vs1.8 ± 0.3, p = 0.02), but not remodeling. In a model adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors, the HFpEF group had a lower LVEF (estimate −4.78, p = 0.0437) than the suspected CMD group.

Conclusions

HFpEF participants exhibit greater arterial stiffness and lower myocardial perfusion reserve, with lower LVEF albeit not remodeling, compared to suspected CMD participants. These findings suggest arterial stiffness may contribute to progression from CMD to HFpEF. Prospective work is needed and ongoing.

冠状动脉微血管功能障碍和射血分数保留型心力衰竭的动脉僵硬度评估:WISE-CVD持续研究的初步报告
背景射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HFpEF)是冠状动脉微血管功能障碍(CMD)患者最常见的心脏并发症,但其潜在的发病机制仍不清楚。主动脉脉搏波速度(aPWV)是大动脉僵化的指标,也是心血管疾病的预测指标。在没有阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的参与者中,我们评估了 51 名疑似 CMD 的女性和 20 名有证据表明患有 HFpEF 的女性和男性。所有参与者都接受了 aPWV 测量(SphygmoCor,Atcor Medical),aPWV 越高表明血管僵化程度越高。心脏磁共振成像(CMRI)通过心肌灌注储备指数(MPRI)评估左心室射血分数、CMD,并通过左心室质量体积比评估心室重塑。统计分析采用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验、Pearson 相关性和线性回归分析、p=0.002),体重指数(31.0 ± 4.3 vs 27.8 ± 6.7 kg/m2,p=0.013)较高,aPWV(10.5 ± 2.0 vs 8.0 ± 1.6 m/s,p=0.05)较高,MPRI(1.5 ± 0.3 vs 1.8 ± 0.3,p=0.02)较低,但没有重塑。结论与疑似 CMD 患者相比,HFpEF 患者的动脉僵化程度更高,心肌灌注储备更低,LVEF 更低,但没有发生重塑。这些研究结果表明,动脉僵化可能是导致CMD发展为HFpEF的原因之一。前瞻性工作仍需进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
59 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信