The tales of contradiction: A thematic analysis of British sheep farmers’ perceptions of managing sheep scab in their flocks

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Alice Emily Olive Smith , Charlotte Doidge , Tanja Knific , Fiona Lovatt , Jasmeet Kaler
{"title":"The tales of contradiction: A thematic analysis of British sheep farmers’ perceptions of managing sheep scab in their flocks","authors":"Alice Emily Olive Smith ,&nbsp;Charlotte Doidge ,&nbsp;Tanja Knific ,&nbsp;Fiona Lovatt ,&nbsp;Jasmeet Kaler","doi":"10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sheep scab is endemic in Great Britain with an estimated national herd-level prevalence of 10.9% from a surveyed population of sheep farms. Previous studies have investigated how sheep farmers manage sheep scab on their farms in Great Britain, but there have not been any qualitative studies investigating sheep farmers perceptions on the roles different stakeholders have in the management of sheep scab. This qualitative study aims to explore how sheep farmers perceive their role and the different stakeholders’ roles in the management of sheep scab, and how they would like sheep scab to be managed going forward. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 43 sheep farmers from England, Scotland, and Wales. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, through the theoretical lens of Foucault’s notion of ‘biopower’. Two themes were generated: ‘The feeling of powerlessness leads to a need of rules and regulations’, with sub-themes: ‘The need for governmental rules and regulations’ and ‘The need for rules and regulation at livestock markets’, and ‘An apparent lack of sheep scab surveillance’, with sub-themes: ‘The farmers perceive that the veterinarians have control over surveillance’ and ‘The farmers have control over surveillance on their farms’. In the first theme, the respondents suggested that more rules and regulations to control the management of sheep scab was required. This included reinstating of sheep scab as a notifiable disease in England and Wales, as well as more regulations at livestock markets to prevent the trading of infested sheep; both of which would subject the farmers to regulatory power mechanisms. The second theme centred around who has the control of surveillance on the farms. Most of the respondents perceived that the veterinarians had knowledge and expertise of the local area on sheep scab, which they were able to relay to the farmers. Thus, veterinarians exerted disciplinary power by creating ‘docile’ bodies. However, it also appeared that veterinarians were not regularly called onto farms. Although disciplinary power flows through the interactions between the farmer and veterinarian, the techniques currently used are not always having their desired effect. The study demonstrated that how sheep farmers want sheep scab to be managed is, at times, conflicting and contradictory, which highlights the complexity of sheep scab as a disease to manage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20413,"journal":{"name":"Preventive veterinary medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive veterinary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587724000801","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sheep scab is endemic in Great Britain with an estimated national herd-level prevalence of 10.9% from a surveyed population of sheep farms. Previous studies have investigated how sheep farmers manage sheep scab on their farms in Great Britain, but there have not been any qualitative studies investigating sheep farmers perceptions on the roles different stakeholders have in the management of sheep scab. This qualitative study aims to explore how sheep farmers perceive their role and the different stakeholders’ roles in the management of sheep scab, and how they would like sheep scab to be managed going forward. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 43 sheep farmers from England, Scotland, and Wales. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, through the theoretical lens of Foucault’s notion of ‘biopower’. Two themes were generated: ‘The feeling of powerlessness leads to a need of rules and regulations’, with sub-themes: ‘The need for governmental rules and regulations’ and ‘The need for rules and regulation at livestock markets’, and ‘An apparent lack of sheep scab surveillance’, with sub-themes: ‘The farmers perceive that the veterinarians have control over surveillance’ and ‘The farmers have control over surveillance on their farms’. In the first theme, the respondents suggested that more rules and regulations to control the management of sheep scab was required. This included reinstating of sheep scab as a notifiable disease in England and Wales, as well as more regulations at livestock markets to prevent the trading of infested sheep; both of which would subject the farmers to regulatory power mechanisms. The second theme centred around who has the control of surveillance on the farms. Most of the respondents perceived that the veterinarians had knowledge and expertise of the local area on sheep scab, which they were able to relay to the farmers. Thus, veterinarians exerted disciplinary power by creating ‘docile’ bodies. However, it also appeared that veterinarians were not regularly called onto farms. Although disciplinary power flows through the interactions between the farmer and veterinarian, the techniques currently used are not always having their desired effect. The study demonstrated that how sheep farmers want sheep scab to be managed is, at times, conflicting and contradictory, which highlights the complexity of sheep scab as a disease to manage.

矛盾的故事:英国养羊人对羊群疥疮管理看法的专题分析
绵羊疥癣是英国的地方病,根据对养羊场的调查,全国牧群的发病率估计为 10.9%。以往的研究曾调查过养羊户如何管理其英国农场的绵羊疥癣,但还没有任何定性研究调查过养羊户对不同利益相关者在绵羊疥癣管理中所扮演角色的看法。本定性研究旨在探讨养羊人如何看待自己和不同利益相关者在羊疥疮管理中的作用,以及他们希望今后如何管理羊疥疮。研究人员对来自英格兰、苏格兰和威尔士的 43 位养羊户进行了半结构化访谈。通过福柯 "生物权力 "概念的理论视角,采用反思性主题分析法对数据进行了分析。得出了两个主题:无力感导致对规则和监管的需求",下设子主题:"对政府规则和监管的需求 "和 "对牲畜市场规则和监管的需求";以及 "明显缺乏对羊疥疮的监控",下设子主题:"农场主认为兽医可以控制对羊疥疮的监控 "和 "农场主可以控制对其农场的监控"。在第一个主题中,受访者建议需要更多的规则和条例来控制羊疥疮的管理。这包括在英格兰和威尔士重新将绵羊疥疮列为应通报的疾病,以及在牲畜市场制定更多法规以防止受感染绵羊的交易;这两项措施都将使农场主受到监管权力机制的制约。第二个主题围绕谁能控制农场的监控。大多数受访者认为,兽医拥有当地有关羊疥癣的知识和专长,他们能够将这些知识和专长传达给养殖户。因此,兽医通过建立 "听话 "的机构来行使纪律权力。不过,兽医似乎并不经常被叫到农场。虽然惩戒权在养殖户和兽医之间的互动中流动,但目前使用的技术并不总能达到预期效果。研究表明,养羊户希望如何管理羊疥癣,有时是相互矛盾和冲突的,这突出了羊疥癣作为一种疾病需要管理的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Preventive veterinary medicine
Preventive veterinary medicine 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Preventive Veterinary Medicine is one of the leading international resources for scientific reports on animal health programs and preventive veterinary medicine. The journal follows the guidelines for standardizing and strengthening the reporting of biomedical research which are available from the CONSORT, MOOSE, PRISMA, REFLECT, STARD, and STROBE statements. The journal focuses on: Epidemiology of health events relevant to domestic and wild animals; Economic impacts of epidemic and endemic animal and zoonotic diseases; Latest methods and approaches in veterinary epidemiology; Disease and infection control or eradication measures; The "One Health" concept and the relationships between veterinary medicine, human health, animal-production systems, and the environment; Development of new techniques in surveillance systems and diagnosis; Evaluation and control of diseases in animal populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信