Does the surface charge of the nanoparticles drive nanoparticle–cell membrane interactions?

IF 7.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Sandor Balog , Mauro Sousa de Almeida , Patricia Taladriz-Blanco , Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser , Alke Petri-Fink
{"title":"Does the surface charge of the nanoparticles drive nanoparticle–cell membrane interactions?","authors":"Sandor Balog ,&nbsp;Mauro Sousa de Almeida ,&nbsp;Patricia Taladriz-Blanco ,&nbsp;Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser ,&nbsp;Alke Petri-Fink","doi":"10.1016/j.copbio.2024.103128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Classical Coulombic interaction, characterized by electrostatic interactions mediated through surface charges, is often regarded as the primary determinant in nanoparticles' (NPs) cellular association and internalization. However, the intricate physicochemical properties of particle surfaces, biomolecular coronas, and cell surfaces defy this oversimplified perspective. Moreover, the nanometrological techniques employed to characterize NPs in complex physiological fluids often exhibit limited accuracy and reproducibility. A more comprehensive understanding of nanoparticle–cell membrane interactions, extending beyond attractive forces between oppositely charged surfaces, necessitates the establishment of databases through rigorous physical, chemical, and biological characterization supported by nanoscale analytics. Additionally, computational approaches, such as <em>in silico</em> modeling and machine learning, play a crucial role in unraveling the complexities of these interactions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10833,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in biotechnology","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 103128"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958166924000648","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Classical Coulombic interaction, characterized by electrostatic interactions mediated through surface charges, is often regarded as the primary determinant in nanoparticles' (NPs) cellular association and internalization. However, the intricate physicochemical properties of particle surfaces, biomolecular coronas, and cell surfaces defy this oversimplified perspective. Moreover, the nanometrological techniques employed to characterize NPs in complex physiological fluids often exhibit limited accuracy and reproducibility. A more comprehensive understanding of nanoparticle–cell membrane interactions, extending beyond attractive forces between oppositely charged surfaces, necessitates the establishment of databases through rigorous physical, chemical, and biological characterization supported by nanoscale analytics. Additionally, computational approaches, such as in silico modeling and machine learning, play a crucial role in unraveling the complexities of these interactions.

Abstract Image

纳米粒子的表面电荷是否会驱动纳米粒子-细胞膜之间的相互作用?
经典库仑相互作用的特点是通过表面电荷介导的静电相互作用,通常被认为是纳米粒子(NPs)与细胞结合和内化的主要决定因素。然而,颗粒表面、生物分子冠层和细胞表面错综复杂的物理化学特性打破了这一过于简单化的观点。此外,用于表征复杂生理液体中 NPs 特征的纳米计量学技术往往表现出有限的准确性和可重复性。要想更全面地了解纳米粒子与细胞膜之间的相互作用,不仅仅局限于带电表面之间的吸引力,还需要通过严格的物理、化学和生物表征建立数据库,并辅以纳米级分析。此外,硅学建模和机器学习等计算方法在揭示这些相互作用的复杂性方面发挥着至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current opinion in biotechnology
Current opinion in biotechnology 工程技术-生化研究方法
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
226
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Biotechnology (COBIOT) is renowned for publishing authoritative, comprehensive, and systematic reviews. By offering clear and readable syntheses of current advances in biotechnology, COBIOT assists specialists in staying updated on the latest developments in the field. Expert authors annotate the most noteworthy papers from the vast array of information available today, providing readers with valuable insights and saving them time. As part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals, COBIOT is accompanied by the open-access primary research journal, Current Research in Biotechnology (CRBIOT). Leveraging the editorial excellence, high impact, and global reach of the Current Opinion legacy, CO+RE journals ensure they are widely read resources integral to scientists' workflows. COBIOT is organized into themed sections, each reviewed once a year. These themes cover various areas of biotechnology, including analytical biotechnology, plant biotechnology, food biotechnology, energy biotechnology, environmental biotechnology, systems biology, nanobiotechnology, tissue, cell, and pathway engineering, chemical biotechnology, and pharmaceutical biotechnology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信