The effects of lifestyle and behavioural interventions on cancer recurrence, overall survival and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Ladan Yeganeh , Suzanne Willey , Ching Shan Wan , Mahnaz Bahri Khomami , Mohammad Chehrazi , Olivia Cook , Kate Webber
{"title":"The effects of lifestyle and behavioural interventions on cancer recurrence, overall survival and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: A systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Ladan Yeganeh ,&nbsp;Suzanne Willey ,&nbsp;Ching Shan Wan ,&nbsp;Mahnaz Bahri Khomami ,&nbsp;Mohammad Chehrazi ,&nbsp;Olivia Cook ,&nbsp;Kate Webber","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.107977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lifestyle/behavioural interventions may improve breast cancer outcomes and quality of life (QoL); however, uncertainty remains about the most effective interventions due to limited evidence. This study aimed to assess and compare the effects of lifestyle/behavioural interventions on cancer recurrence, survival and QoL in breast cancer survivors. Electronic databases including Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and EBM Reviews were searched for relevant literature. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing a lifestyle/behavioural intervention with a control condition in breast cancer survivors were included. Outcomes included cancer recurrence, overall survival and QoL. A network meta-analysis synthesized intervention effect. Studies not included in the analysis were reported narratively. Of 6251 identified articles, 38 studies met the selection criteria. Limited evidence exists on the impacts of lifestyle/behavioural interventions on breast cancer recurrence/survival. Exercise was identified as the most effective intervention in improving overall survival (HR 0.50, 95 % CI 0.36, 0.68). Lifestyle/behavioural interventions may improve QoL; psychosocial interventions (SMD 1.28, 95 % CI 0.80, 1.77) and aerobic-resistance exercise (SMD 0.33, 95 % CI -0.03, 0.69) were the most effective interventions to enhance QoL. This review highlights potential post-breast cancer benefits from lifestyle/behavioural interventions, notably exercise and psychosocial support for QoL and exercise for overall survival. Thus, encouraging active lifestyle, stress management and coping skills programs during and after cancer treatment may enhance physical wellbeing and QoL. However, the findings should be interpreted with caution due to the small number and sample sizes of studies. Future longer-term RCTs are required for conclusive recommendations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378512224000720/pdfft?md5=3f43c6f71c737568723765c85fb33ac1&pid=1-s2.0-S0378512224000720-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378512224000720","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lifestyle/behavioural interventions may improve breast cancer outcomes and quality of life (QoL); however, uncertainty remains about the most effective interventions due to limited evidence. This study aimed to assess and compare the effects of lifestyle/behavioural interventions on cancer recurrence, survival and QoL in breast cancer survivors. Electronic databases including Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and EBM Reviews were searched for relevant literature. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing a lifestyle/behavioural intervention with a control condition in breast cancer survivors were included. Outcomes included cancer recurrence, overall survival and QoL. A network meta-analysis synthesized intervention effect. Studies not included in the analysis were reported narratively. Of 6251 identified articles, 38 studies met the selection criteria. Limited evidence exists on the impacts of lifestyle/behavioural interventions on breast cancer recurrence/survival. Exercise was identified as the most effective intervention in improving overall survival (HR 0.50, 95 % CI 0.36, 0.68). Lifestyle/behavioural interventions may improve QoL; psychosocial interventions (SMD 1.28, 95 % CI 0.80, 1.77) and aerobic-resistance exercise (SMD 0.33, 95 % CI -0.03, 0.69) were the most effective interventions to enhance QoL. This review highlights potential post-breast cancer benefits from lifestyle/behavioural interventions, notably exercise and psychosocial support for QoL and exercise for overall survival. Thus, encouraging active lifestyle, stress management and coping skills programs during and after cancer treatment may enhance physical wellbeing and QoL. However, the findings should be interpreted with caution due to the small number and sample sizes of studies. Future longer-term RCTs are required for conclusive recommendations.

生活方式和行为干预对乳腺癌幸存者癌症复发、总体生存和生活质量的影响:系统综述和网络荟萃分析
生活方式/行为干预措施可改善乳腺癌的预后和生活质量(QoL);然而,由于证据有限,最有效的干预措施仍存在不确定性。本研究旨在评估和比较生活方式/行为干预对乳腺癌幸存者癌症复发、生存和生活质量的影响。研究人员在 Medline、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CINAHL 和 EBM Reviews 等电子数据库中检索了相关文献。纳入了对乳腺癌幸存者进行生活方式/行为干预与对照条件比较的随机对照试验(RCT)和准 RCT。结果包括癌症复发、总生存期和 QoL。一项网络荟萃分析综合了干预效果。对未纳入分析的研究进行了叙述性报告。在 6251 篇鉴定文章中,有 38 项研究符合筛选标准。关于生活方式/行为干预对乳腺癌复发/生存影响的证据有限。运动被认为是提高总生存率最有效的干预措施(HR 0.50, 95 % CI 0.36, 0.68)。生活方式/行为干预可提高生活质量;社会心理干预(SMD 1.28,95 % CI 0.80,1.77)和有氧抗阻运动(SMD 0.33,95 % CI -0.03,0.69)是提高生活质量最有效的干预措施。本综述强调了生活方式/行为干预对乳腺癌术后患者的潜在益处,尤其是运动和心理支持对提高生活质量的益处,以及运动对提高总生存率的益处。因此,在癌症治疗期间和之后鼓励积极的生活方式、压力管理和应对技能计划可能会提高身体健康和生活质量。然而,由于研究的数量和样本量较少,在解释研究结果时应谨慎。今后还需要进行更长期的研究性试验,才能提出结论性建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信