The governance of artificial intelligence in Canada: Findings and opportunities from a review of 84 AI governance initiatives

IF 7.8 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Blair Attard-Frost , Ana Brandusescu , Kelly Lyons
{"title":"The governance of artificial intelligence in Canada: Findings and opportunities from a review of 84 AI governance initiatives","authors":"Blair Attard-Frost ,&nbsp;Ana Brandusescu ,&nbsp;Kelly Lyons","doi":"10.1016/j.giq.2024.101929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years, the effective governance of artificial intelligence (AI) systems has become a strategic necessity for many nations. Among those nations, Canada is particularly noteworthy: Canada was the first nation to implement a national AI strategy, and more recently, Canada's federal and provincial governments have designed and implemented a wide range of initiatives that attempt to intervene in a variety of potential impacts associated with AI systems. We present a semi-systematic review and synthesis of 84 of those AI governance initiatives. We find that those 84 initiatives predominantly focus on developing programs, policies, and strategic plans to intervene in industry and innovation, technology production and use, AI research, and public administration. Conversely, we find relatively little focus on developing ethics statements or standards, as well as little focus on intervening in social and workforce development services, AI education and training, and digital infrastructure. We suggest three opportunities for researchers and four opportunities for practitioners that, if enacted, would strengthen the overall state of Canadian AI governance. Our study contributes a novel macro-scale synthesis of AI governance initiatives within a national context, as well as practical opportunities for intervening in national AI governance challenges related to evaluation of initiative outcomes, public trust and participation in initiatives, AI impact representation in initiatives, and national unification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48258,"journal":{"name":"Government Information Quarterly","volume":"41 2","pages":"Article 101929"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X24000212/pdfft?md5=2c90db6a650b59b536c01a9f73a4fc5f&pid=1-s2.0-S0740624X24000212-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Government Information Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X24000212","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the effective governance of artificial intelligence (AI) systems has become a strategic necessity for many nations. Among those nations, Canada is particularly noteworthy: Canada was the first nation to implement a national AI strategy, and more recently, Canada's federal and provincial governments have designed and implemented a wide range of initiatives that attempt to intervene in a variety of potential impacts associated with AI systems. We present a semi-systematic review and synthesis of 84 of those AI governance initiatives. We find that those 84 initiatives predominantly focus on developing programs, policies, and strategic plans to intervene in industry and innovation, technology production and use, AI research, and public administration. Conversely, we find relatively little focus on developing ethics statements or standards, as well as little focus on intervening in social and workforce development services, AI education and training, and digital infrastructure. We suggest three opportunities for researchers and four opportunities for practitioners that, if enacted, would strengthen the overall state of Canadian AI governance. Our study contributes a novel macro-scale synthesis of AI governance initiatives within a national context, as well as practical opportunities for intervening in national AI governance challenges related to evaluation of initiative outcomes, public trust and participation in initiatives, AI impact representation in initiatives, and national unification.

加拿大的人工智能治理:对84项人工智能治理倡议的审查结果与机遇
近年来,有效管理人工智能(AI)系统已成为许多国家的战略需要。在这些国家中,加拿大尤其值得一提:加拿大是第一个实施国家人工智能战略的国家,最近,加拿大联邦政府和省政府设计并实施了一系列举措,试图干预与人工智能系统相关的各种潜在影响。我们对其中的 84 项人工智能治理倡议进行了半系统性的回顾和总结。我们发现,这 84 项举措主要侧重于制定方案、政策和战略计划,以干预产业和创新、技术生产和使用、人工智能研究和公共管理。相反,我们发现制定伦理声明或标准的重点相对较少,干预社会和劳动力发展服务、人工智能教育和培训以及数字基础设施的重点也很少。我们为研究人员提出了三个机会,为从业人员提出了四个机会,如果这些机会得以实施,将会加强加拿大人工智能治理的整体状况。我们的研究对国家背景下的人工智能治理倡议进行了新颖的宏观综合,并为干预与倡议成果评估、倡议中的公众信任和参与、倡议中的人工智能影响代表以及国家统一相关的国家人工智能治理挑战提供了切实可行的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Government Information Quarterly
Government Information Quarterly INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Government Information Quarterly (GIQ) delves into the convergence of policy, information technology, government, and the public. It explores the impact of policies on government information flows, the role of technology in innovative government services, and the dynamic between citizens and governing bodies in the digital age. GIQ serves as a premier journal, disseminating high-quality research and insights that bridge the realms of policy, information technology, government, and public engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信