Understanding the multi-source uncertainties effect on the seismic performance assessment of deeply hydraulic tunnels based on the generalized PDEM

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Benbo Sun , Mingjiang Deng , Jia Xu , Yan Xu , Haibo Cui
{"title":"Understanding the multi-source uncertainties effect on the seismic performance assessment of deeply hydraulic tunnels based on the generalized PDEM","authors":"Benbo Sun ,&nbsp;Mingjiang Deng ,&nbsp;Jia Xu ,&nbsp;Yan Xu ,&nbsp;Haibo Cui","doi":"10.1016/j.probengmech.2024.103619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One crucial element of a seismic performance evaluation approach is to appropriately account for the stochastic characteristics of SGMs and the uncertainty associated with material properties. Furthermore, the incidence angle of seismic waves may be influenced by topographic and geological factors, leading to uncertainty and randomness. This variability in incident angles has the potential to cause unforeseen structural damage. However, the current seismic design code of underground structures has commonly assumed the vertical or horizontal seismic input method in underground engineering. From the uncertain point of view, the multi-source uncertainties that incorporate the nonstationary SMGs, seismic input angles, and material parameters utilized to conduct the seismic performance assessment of HTs remain a challenge in current seismic design and performance evaluation. To overcome this challenge, the Generalized F-discrepancy method, the generalized PDEM, and the equivalent extreme-value event are introduced to conduct stochastic dynamic analysis and develop the appropriate fragility curves of HTs considering the multi-source uncertainties. The results demonstrate that the probability of damage of the HT obtained by multi-source uncertainties is significantly different in analyzing the single uncertain and two uncertainties. Moreover, it can be concluded that the multi-source uncertainties can cause more seismic demand than the single uncertain and two uncertainties under different earthquake intensity levels for the HT. In light of this, it is strongly suggested that seismic design and performance assessment of HTs take into account the relevant aspects, such as the input angles, the random features of seismic waves, and the material parameters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54583,"journal":{"name":"Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266892024000419","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One crucial element of a seismic performance evaluation approach is to appropriately account for the stochastic characteristics of SGMs and the uncertainty associated with material properties. Furthermore, the incidence angle of seismic waves may be influenced by topographic and geological factors, leading to uncertainty and randomness. This variability in incident angles has the potential to cause unforeseen structural damage. However, the current seismic design code of underground structures has commonly assumed the vertical or horizontal seismic input method in underground engineering. From the uncertain point of view, the multi-source uncertainties that incorporate the nonstationary SMGs, seismic input angles, and material parameters utilized to conduct the seismic performance assessment of HTs remain a challenge in current seismic design and performance evaluation. To overcome this challenge, the Generalized F-discrepancy method, the generalized PDEM, and the equivalent extreme-value event are introduced to conduct stochastic dynamic analysis and develop the appropriate fragility curves of HTs considering the multi-source uncertainties. The results demonstrate that the probability of damage of the HT obtained by multi-source uncertainties is significantly different in analyzing the single uncertain and two uncertainties. Moreover, it can be concluded that the multi-source uncertainties can cause more seismic demand than the single uncertain and two uncertainties under different earthquake intensity levels for the HT. In light of this, it is strongly suggested that seismic design and performance assessment of HTs take into account the relevant aspects, such as the input angles, the random features of seismic waves, and the material parameters.

基于广义 PDEM 理解多源不确定性对深层水工隧道抗震性能评估的影响
地震性能评估方法的一个关键要素是适当考虑 SGM 的随机特性以及与材料特性相关的不确定性。此外,地震波的入射角可能会受到地形和地质因素的影响,从而导致不确定性和随机性。入射角的这种变化有可能造成不可预见的结构破坏。然而,现行的地下结构抗震设计规范普遍假定地下工程采用垂直或水平地震输入法。从不确定性的角度来看,结合非稳态 SMG、地震输入角和材料参数进行 HT 抗震性能评估的多源不确定性仍然是当前抗震设计和性能评估中的一项挑战。为克服这一挑战,本文引入了广义 F-差分法、广义 PDEM 和等效极值事件,以进行随机动力分析,并在考虑多源不确定性的情况下,制定适当的 HT 脆性曲线。结果表明,在分析单一不确定性和两个不确定性时,多源不确定性得到的 HT 损坏概率有显著差异。此外,还可以得出结论,在不同地震烈度水平下,多源不确定性会比单一不确定性和两种不确定性对 HT 造成更大的地震需求。有鉴于此,强烈建议在 HT 的抗震设计和性能评估中考虑输入角、地震波随机特征和材料参数等相关方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics
Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
98
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: This journal provides a forum for scholarly work dealing primarily with probabilistic and statistical approaches to contemporary solid/structural and fluid mechanics problems encountered in diverse technical disciplines such as aerospace, civil, marine, mechanical, and nuclear engineering. The journal aims to maintain a healthy balance between general solution techniques and problem-specific results, encouraging a fruitful exchange of ideas among disparate engineering specialities.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信