Update in LV Only Fusion CRT Pacing: Annals and Future Perspectives.

Current health sciences journal Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-29 DOI:10.12865/CHSJ.49.04.01
Andra Gurgu, Lucian Petrescu, Constantin Tudor Luca, Cristina Văcărescu, Georgică Târtea, Emilia-Violeta Goanță, Liviu Cirin, Dragoș Cozma
{"title":"Update in LV Only Fusion CRT Pacing: Annals and Future Perspectives.","authors":"Andra Gurgu, Lucian Petrescu, Constantin Tudor Luca, Cristina Văcărescu, Georgică Târtea, Emilia-Violeta Goanță, Liviu Cirin, Dragoș Cozma","doi":"10.12865/CHSJ.49.04.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Triple-chamber cardiac devices are utilized for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and is the standard-of-care therapy for heart failure (HF) patients in the current guidelines. In the setting of biventricular (BIV) pacing it involves a mandatory implantation of right ventricular (RV) lead that allows simultaneous BIV pacing with 0 ms VV (ventricular to ventricular) interval. Nevertheless, it seems that response to CRT is not related to RV lead position. RV pacing is known for deleterious effects on RV/Left Ventricle (LV) function and should not be used in persons with normal atrioventricular conduction (AV) and sinus rhythm. As it compensates for the additional asynchrony induced by unnecessary stimulation of RV pacing, only pacing the left ventricle (LV) may result in improved cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcomes and a decrease in the number of individuals who do not respond to the procedure. Furthermore, leadless LV fusion CRT pacing without RV lead could be a potential CRT therapy alternative to BIV pacing in nonischemic heart failure patients with preserved AV conduction. The aim of our study is to made an update in cardiac resynchronization therapy with LV only fusion pacing.</p>","PeriodicalId":93963,"journal":{"name":"Current health sciences journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10976202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current health sciences journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12865/CHSJ.49.04.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Triple-chamber cardiac devices are utilized for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and is the standard-of-care therapy for heart failure (HF) patients in the current guidelines. In the setting of biventricular (BIV) pacing it involves a mandatory implantation of right ventricular (RV) lead that allows simultaneous BIV pacing with 0 ms VV (ventricular to ventricular) interval. Nevertheless, it seems that response to CRT is not related to RV lead position. RV pacing is known for deleterious effects on RV/Left Ventricle (LV) function and should not be used in persons with normal atrioventricular conduction (AV) and sinus rhythm. As it compensates for the additional asynchrony induced by unnecessary stimulation of RV pacing, only pacing the left ventricle (LV) may result in improved cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcomes and a decrease in the number of individuals who do not respond to the procedure. Furthermore, leadless LV fusion CRT pacing without RV lead could be a potential CRT therapy alternative to BIV pacing in nonischemic heart failure patients with preserved AV conduction. The aim of our study is to made an update in cardiac resynchronization therapy with LV only fusion pacing.

仅左心室融合 CRT 起搏的最新进展:年鉴与未来展望
三腔心脏设备用于心脏再同步化治疗(CRT),是现行指南中心力衰竭(HF)患者的标准治疗方法。在双心室(BIV)起搏的情况下,必须植入右心室(RV)导联,使双心室(BIV)起搏同时达到 0 毫秒 VV(心室到心室)间隔。然而,对 CRT 的反应似乎与 RV 导联位置无关。众所周知,RV 起搏会对 RV/左心室(LV)功能产生有害影响,因此不应用于房室传导(AV)和窦性心律正常的患者。由于只对左心室起搏可补偿因不必要的 RV 起搏刺激而引起的额外不同步,因此可改善心脏再同步化疗法(CRT)的疗效,并减少对手术无反应的人数。此外,在保留房室传导的非缺血性心衰患者中,不使用 RV 导联的无导联 LV 融合 CRT 起搏可能是 BIV 起搏的一种潜在 CRT 治疗替代方法。我们的研究旨在更新仅左心室融合起搏的心脏再同步疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信