Perceived Negative Effects of Tic Management Strategies in Adults With Tic Disorders.

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Behavior Modification Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1177/01454455241236446
Kathryn E Barber, Brandon X Pitts, Jordan T Stiede, Flint M Espil, Douglas W Woods, Matthew W Specht, Shannon M Bennett, John T Walkup, Emily J Ricketts, Joseph F McGuire, Alan L Peterson, Scott N Compton, Sabine Wilhelm, Lawrence Scahill, John C Piacentini
{"title":"Perceived Negative Effects of Tic Management Strategies in Adults With Tic Disorders.","authors":"Kathryn E Barber, Brandon X Pitts, Jordan T Stiede, Flint M Espil, Douglas W Woods, Matthew W Specht, Shannon M Bennett, John T Walkup, Emily J Ricketts, Joseph F McGuire, Alan L Peterson, Scott N Compton, Sabine Wilhelm, Lawrence Scahill, John C Piacentini","doi":"10.1177/01454455241236446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Behavior therapy is a well-established and empirically supported treatment for tic disorders (TDs). However, concerns have been expressed about the negative effects of behavioral interventions, such as tic worsening, tic substitution, and excessive effort. This study explored perceived negative effects of tic management strategies in adults with TDs and predictors of these experiences. Participants (<i>N</i> = 72) completed semi-structured interviews 11 years after receiving behavior therapy or supportive therapy in a randomized clinical trial. We examined responses to interview questions about managing tics and predictors of reported negative effects. Most participants did not experience tic worsening (84%) or tic substitution (75%) from tic management strategies. The majority felt they could manage tics while participating in their environment (87%) and did not report life interference from tic management (77%). About half (45%) felt less present when managing tics. Treatment non-responders in the original trial were more likely to report negative effects of tic management strategies. No differences in reported negative consequences were found between those who received behavior therapy versus supportive therapy, suggesting that behavior therapy specifically does not lead to such adverse effects. These findings could reduce misconceptions about behavior therapy for TDs and enhance its acceptability and utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":48037,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Modification","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11179959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Modification","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455241236446","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Behavior therapy is a well-established and empirically supported treatment for tic disorders (TDs). However, concerns have been expressed about the negative effects of behavioral interventions, such as tic worsening, tic substitution, and excessive effort. This study explored perceived negative effects of tic management strategies in adults with TDs and predictors of these experiences. Participants (N = 72) completed semi-structured interviews 11 years after receiving behavior therapy or supportive therapy in a randomized clinical trial. We examined responses to interview questions about managing tics and predictors of reported negative effects. Most participants did not experience tic worsening (84%) or tic substitution (75%) from tic management strategies. The majority felt they could manage tics while participating in their environment (87%) and did not report life interference from tic management (77%). About half (45%) felt less present when managing tics. Treatment non-responders in the original trial were more likely to report negative effects of tic management strategies. No differences in reported negative consequences were found between those who received behavior therapy versus supportive therapy, suggesting that behavior therapy specifically does not lead to such adverse effects. These findings could reduce misconceptions about behavior therapy for TDs and enhance its acceptability and utilization.

成人抽搐症患者对抽搐管理策略负面影响的认知。
行为疗法是治疗抽搐症(TDs)的一种行之有效且得到经验支持的治疗方法。然而,也有人对行为干预的负面影响表示担忧,如抽搐恶化、抽搐替代和过度努力。本研究探讨了成人抽搐症患者对抽搐管理策略的负面影响的感知及其预测因素。参与者(N = 72)在随机临床试验中接受行为疗法或支持疗法 11 年后完成了半结构化访谈。我们研究了他们对有关控制抽搐的访谈问题的回答,以及报告的负面影响的预测因素。大多数参与者在采取抽搐管理策略后没有出现抽搐恶化(84%)或抽搐替代(75%)。大多数人认为他们可以在参与环境活动的同时控制抽搐(87%),并且没有报告抽搐控制对生活造成的干扰(77%)。约有一半(45%)的患者在控制抽搐时感觉不到自己的存在。在最初的试验中,对治疗无反应者更有可能报告抽搐控制策略的负面影响。接受行为疗法和支持疗法的患者在报告的负面影响方面没有发现差异,这表明行为疗法不会导致此类不良影响。这些发现可以减少人们对行为疗法治疗抽动障碍的误解,提高行为疗法的可接受性和利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavior Modification
Behavior Modification PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: For two decades, researchers and practitioners have turned to Behavior Modification for current scholarship on applied behavior modification. Starting in 1995, in addition to keeping you informed on assessment and modification techniques relevant to psychiatric, clinical, education, and rehabilitation settings, Behavior Modification revised and expanded its focus to include treatment manuals and program descriptions. With these features you can follow the process of clinical research and see how it can be applied to your own work. And, with Behavior Modification, successful clinical and administrative experts have an outlet for sharing their solutions in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信