Validating the effectiveness of a self-report tool to predict unsafe behavior of industrial workers: a QEEG analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ERGONOMICS
Mahnaz Shakerian, Mohammad Nami, Mehdi Jahangiri, Jafar Hasanzadeh, Moslem Alimohammadlou, Alireza Choobineh
{"title":"Validating the effectiveness of a self-report tool to predict unsafe behavior of industrial workers: a QEEG analysis.","authors":"Mahnaz Shakerian, Mohammad Nami, Mehdi Jahangiri, Jafar Hasanzadeh, Moslem Alimohammadlou, Alireza Choobineh","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2024.2330249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives.</i> Unsafe behavior (UB) is defined as the likelihood of intentionally or unintentionally deviating from pre-defined plans. This study aims to investigate the validation of a self-report tool for measuring workers' cognitive-based UB using quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG). <i>Methods.</i> The cognitive-based unsafe behavior questionnaire (CUBQ) was completed by 632 front-line workers in a manufacturing industry to identify differences in the backgrounds of the subjects regarding UBs. Two groups were then selected as extreme groups and QEEG was conducted based on the international 10-20 electrode placement. <i>Results.</i> The mean values of absolute power (AP), alpha/beta ratio (ABR) and alpha/gamma ratio (AGR) from brain oscillations in different regions of the cortex were significantly different between the studied groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Additionally, these values were found to be significantly correlated with slips, lapses and mistakes, as measured by certain scales of the CUBQ (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <i>Conclusions.</i> The findings of this study indicated differences in brain oscillation activities among industrial workers with different UB backgrounds. These results confirm the effectiveness of CUBQ as a proactive tool for safety practitioners to predict industrial workers' UBs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2024.2330249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. Unsafe behavior (UB) is defined as the likelihood of intentionally or unintentionally deviating from pre-defined plans. This study aims to investigate the validation of a self-report tool for measuring workers' cognitive-based UB using quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG). Methods. The cognitive-based unsafe behavior questionnaire (CUBQ) was completed by 632 front-line workers in a manufacturing industry to identify differences in the backgrounds of the subjects regarding UBs. Two groups were then selected as extreme groups and QEEG was conducted based on the international 10-20 electrode placement. Results. The mean values of absolute power (AP), alpha/beta ratio (ABR) and alpha/gamma ratio (AGR) from brain oscillations in different regions of the cortex were significantly different between the studied groups (p < 0.05). Additionally, these values were found to be significantly correlated with slips, lapses and mistakes, as measured by certain scales of the CUBQ (p < 0.05). Conclusions. The findings of this study indicated differences in brain oscillation activities among industrial workers with different UB backgrounds. These results confirm the effectiveness of CUBQ as a proactive tool for safety practitioners to predict industrial workers' UBs.

验证预测产业工人不安全行为的自我报告工具的有效性:QEEG 分析。
目标。不安全行为(UB)被定义为有意或无意偏离预定计划的可能性。本研究旨在调查使用定量脑电图(QEEG)测量工人基于认知的不安全行为的自我报告工具的验证情况。研究方法632 名制造业一线工人填写了基于认知的不安全行为问卷(CUBQ),以确定受试者在不安全行为方面的背景差异。然后选取两组作为极端组,根据国际 10-20 电极放置法进行 QEEG 分析。结果显示研究组之间大脑皮层不同区域大脑振荡的绝对功率(AP)、α/β 比值(ABR)和α/γ 比值(AGR)的平均值存在显著差异(p p 结论:研究结果表明,受试者大脑皮层不同区域大脑振荡的绝对功率(AP)、α/β 比值(ABR)和α/γ 比值(AGR)的平均值存在显著差异。本研究的结果表明,不同 UB 背景的产业工人的大脑振荡活动存在差异。这些结果证实了 CUBQ 作为安全从业人员预测工业工人 UB 的前瞻性工具的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
152
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信