Collagen Meniscal Scaffold Implantation Can Provide Meniscal Regeneration in Asian Patients with Partial Meniscal Defects: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study with Three-Dimensional Volume Analysis of the Meniscus.

Abstract

Background: To date, the efficiency of collagen meniscal scaffold implantation in Asian patients with partial meniscal defects has not been evaluated. In addition, no study has quantitatively analyzed meniscal regeneration using three-dimensional (3D) volume analysis after collagen scaffold implantation. We aimed to compare meniscal regeneration using 3D volume analysis between Asian patients undergoing collagen-based meniscal scaffold implantation after partial meniscectomy and those undergoing only partial meniscectomy.

Methods: Nineteen patients who underwent collagen-based meniscal scaffold implantation and 14 who underwent partial meniscectomy were analyzed with a prospective randomized control design for 12 months postoperatively. The demographic characteristics, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, and location of the injury lesion (medial or lateral meniscus) were not significantly different between the groups. Using 3D volume analysis with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the meniscus-removing ratio during the operative procedure and the meniscus defect-filling ratio were measured during the 12-month postoperative period. Clinically, the visual analog scale, International Knee Documentation Committee score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were evaluated. The Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) and Genovese grade were also evaluated using MRI.

Results: In the 3D volume analysis, the average meniscus-removing ratio during surgery was not significantly different between the groups (-9.3% vs. -9.2%, p = 0.984). The average meniscus defect-filling ratio during the postoperative 12-month period was 7.5% in the scaffold group and -0.4% in the meniscectomy group (p < 0.001). None of the clinical results were significantly different between the scaffold and meniscectomy groups at 12 months postoperatively. The average change in the total WORMS score was not significantly different between the groups (0 vs. 1.9, p = 0.399). The Genovese grade of the implanted collagen scaffold did not significantly change during the follow-up period in terms of morphology and size (p = 0.063); however, the grade significantly improved in terms of signal intensity (p = 0.001).

Conclusions: Definite meniscal regeneration and stable scaffold incorporation were observed after collagen-based meniscal scaffold implantation in Asian patients during 12 months of follow-up. A long-term follow-up study with a larger cohort is required to determine the advantages of collagenous meniscal scaffold implantation in Asian patients.