Predictors for surgical treatment in male patients with non-neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urologia Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1177/03915603241238128
Florin V Hopland-Nechita, John R Andersen, Christian Beisland
{"title":"Predictors for surgical treatment in male patients with non-neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).","authors":"Florin V Hopland-Nechita, John R Andersen, Christian Beisland","doi":"10.1177/03915603241238128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify clinical and biochemical predictors for future surgical intervention in male LUTS patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In a prospective cohort study, parameters as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and IPSS \"bother question\" (IPSS-BQ), prostate volume (PV), maximal urine flow (Qmax), Prostate specific antigen (PSA), post-voidal residual urine (PVR) were assessed alongside comorbidities quantified using Charlson Comorbidity Index without age adjustment and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score. For the statistical analysis, patients were categorized based on subsequent treatment approaches: Group 1: underwent surgery during follow-up; Group 2: received medical or no treatment. <i>T</i>-test was used to test differences between the groups. Logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of the need for future surgery. Following this analysis, we calculated the probability of requiring surgical intervention, with this likelihood being determined based on the accumulation of identified predictive factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 63 patients, 22 underwent surgery over a median follow-up of 42 months. Significant baseline differences were observed in IPSS (<i>p</i> = 0.003), International Prostatic Symptom Score-Voiding subscore (IPSS-VS) (<i>p</i> = 0.002), IPSS-BQ (<i>p</i> = 0.001), Qmax (<i>p</i> = 0.007), and PVR (<i>p</i> = 0.02) between the groups. Higher IPSS-BQ, IPSS-VS, and lower Qmax are emerging as independent surgical treatment predictors in logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study identified IPSS-VS, IPSS-BQ, and Qmax as baseline predictors of future surgical intervention. A clear pattern of a gradual increase in the likelihood of requiring surgery was directly proportional to the cumulative number of these identified predictive factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"617-622"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241238128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to identify clinical and biochemical predictors for future surgical intervention in male LUTS patients.

Materials and methods: In a prospective cohort study, parameters as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and IPSS "bother question" (IPSS-BQ), prostate volume (PV), maximal urine flow (Qmax), Prostate specific antigen (PSA), post-voidal residual urine (PVR) were assessed alongside comorbidities quantified using Charlson Comorbidity Index without age adjustment and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score. For the statistical analysis, patients were categorized based on subsequent treatment approaches: Group 1: underwent surgery during follow-up; Group 2: received medical or no treatment. T-test was used to test differences between the groups. Logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of the need for future surgery. Following this analysis, we calculated the probability of requiring surgical intervention, with this likelihood being determined based on the accumulation of identified predictive factors.

Results: Of 63 patients, 22 underwent surgery over a median follow-up of 42 months. Significant baseline differences were observed in IPSS (p = 0.003), International Prostatic Symptom Score-Voiding subscore (IPSS-VS) (p = 0.002), IPSS-BQ (p = 0.001), Qmax (p = 0.007), and PVR (p = 0.02) between the groups. Higher IPSS-BQ, IPSS-VS, and lower Qmax are emerging as independent surgical treatment predictors in logistic regression analyses.

Conclusion: The study identified IPSS-VS, IPSS-BQ, and Qmax as baseline predictors of future surgical intervention. A clear pattern of a gradual increase in the likelihood of requiring surgery was directly proportional to the cumulative number of these identified predictive factors.

非神经源性下尿路症状(LUTS)男性患者接受手术治疗的预测因素。
研究目的本研究旨在确定男性前列腺痛患者未来手术干预的临床和生化预测因素:在一项前瞻性队列研究中,评估了国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、IPSS "困扰问题"(IPSS-BQ)、前列腺体积(PV)、最大尿流(Qmax)、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、排尿后残余尿(PVR)等参数,并使用夏尔森合并症指数(Charlson Comorbidity Index)(无年龄调整)和美国麻醉学会(ASA)评分对合并症进行量化。为了进行统计分析,根据后续治疗方法对患者进行了分类:第 1 组:随访期间接受手术治疗;第 2 组:接受药物治疗或未接受治疗。采用 T 检验来检验组间差异。我们使用逻辑回归模型来确定未来是否需要手术的独立预测因素。分析之后,我们计算了需要手术干预的概率,这种概率是根据已确定的预测因素的累积来确定的:在 63 名患者中,有 22 人在中位 42 个月的随访期间接受了手术。两组患者的 IPSS(p = 0.003)、国际前列腺症状评分-Voiding 子评分(IPSS-VS)(p = 0.002)、IPSS-BQ(p = 0.001)、Qmax(p = 0.007)和 PVR(p = 0.02)均存在显著基线差异。在逻辑回归分析中,较高的 IPSS-BQ、IPSS-VS 和较低的 Qmax 成为独立的手术治疗预测因素:研究发现,IPSS-VS、IPSS-BQ 和 Qmax 是未来手术干预的基线预测因子。需要手术治疗的可能性逐渐增加的明显模式与这些已确定的预测因素的累积数量成正比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信