Influence of Substrate Stiffness on iPSC-Derived Retinal Pigmented Epithelial Cells.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Rion J Wendland, Budd A Tucker, Kristan S Worthington
{"title":"Influence of Substrate Stiffness on iPSC-Derived Retinal Pigmented Epithelial Cells.","authors":"Rion J Wendland, Budd A Tucker, Kristan S Worthington","doi":"10.1093/stcltm/szae022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Retinal degenerative diseases are a major cause of blindness involving the dysfunction of photoreceptors, retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE), or both. A promising treatment approach involves replacing these cells via surgical transplantation, and previous work has shown that cell delivery scaffolds are vital to ensure sufficient cell survival. Thus, identifying scaffold properties that are conducive to cell viability and maturation (such as suitable material and mechanical properties) is critical to ensuring a successful treatment approach. In this study, we investigated the effect of scaffold stiffness on human RPE attachment, survival, and differentiation, comparing immortalized (ARPE-19) and stem cell-derived RPE (iRPE) cells. Polydimethylsiloxane was used as a model polymer substrate, and varying stiffness (~12 to 800 kPa) was achieved by modulating the cross-link-to-base ratio. Post-attachment changes in gene and protein expression were assessed using qPCR and immunocytochemistry. We found that while ARPE-19 and iRPE exhibited significant differences in morphology and expression of RPE markers, substrate stiffness did not have a substantial impact on cell growth or maturation for either cell type. These results highlight the differences in expression between immortalized and iPSC-derived RPE cells, and also suggest that stiffnesses in this range (~12-800 kPa) may not result in significant differences in RPE growth and maturation, an important consideration in scaffold design.</p>","PeriodicalId":21986,"journal":{"name":"Stem Cells Translational Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"582-592"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11165161/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem Cells Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/stcltm/szae022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Retinal degenerative diseases are a major cause of blindness involving the dysfunction of photoreceptors, retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE), or both. A promising treatment approach involves replacing these cells via surgical transplantation, and previous work has shown that cell delivery scaffolds are vital to ensure sufficient cell survival. Thus, identifying scaffold properties that are conducive to cell viability and maturation (such as suitable material and mechanical properties) is critical to ensuring a successful treatment approach. In this study, we investigated the effect of scaffold stiffness on human RPE attachment, survival, and differentiation, comparing immortalized (ARPE-19) and stem cell-derived RPE (iRPE) cells. Polydimethylsiloxane was used as a model polymer substrate, and varying stiffness (~12 to 800 kPa) was achieved by modulating the cross-link-to-base ratio. Post-attachment changes in gene and protein expression were assessed using qPCR and immunocytochemistry. We found that while ARPE-19 and iRPE exhibited significant differences in morphology and expression of RPE markers, substrate stiffness did not have a substantial impact on cell growth or maturation for either cell type. These results highlight the differences in expression between immortalized and iPSC-derived RPE cells, and also suggest that stiffnesses in this range (~12-800 kPa) may not result in significant differences in RPE growth and maturation, an important consideration in scaffold design.

基底硬度对 iPSC 衍生视网膜色素上皮细胞的影响
视网膜变性疾病是导致失明的主要原因,它涉及光感受器、视网膜色素上皮(RPE)或两者的功能障碍。一种很有前景的治疗方法是通过手术移植取代这些细胞,而以前的工作表明,细胞输送支架对确保细胞充分存活至关重要。因此,确定有利于细胞存活和成熟的支架特性(如合适的材料和机械特性)对于确保成功的治疗方法至关重要。在这项研究中,我们比较了永生化(ARPE-19)和干细胞衍生的RPE(iRPE)细胞,研究了支架硬度对人类RPE附着、存活和分化的影响。聚二甲基硅氧烷被用作模型聚合物基底,通过调节横链与基底的比例实现了不同的硬度(~12 至 800 kPa)。采用 qPCR 和免疫细胞化学方法评估了附着后基因和蛋白质表达的变化。我们发现,虽然 ARPE-19 和 iRPE 在形态和 RPE 标记表达方面存在显著差异,但基底硬度对两种细胞类型的细胞生长或成熟都没有实质性影响。这些结果突显了永生化和 iPSC 衍生的 RPE 细胞在表达上的差异,同时也表明在此范围内(约 12-800 kPa)的硬度可能不会导致 RPE 生长和成熟的显著差异,这也是支架设计中的一个重要考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stem Cells Translational Medicine
Stem Cells Translational Medicine CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
3.30%
发文量
140
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: STEM CELLS Translational Medicine is a monthly, peer-reviewed, largely online, open access journal. STEM CELLS Translational Medicine works to advance the utilization of cells for clinical therapy. By bridging stem cell molecular and biological research and helping speed translations of emerging lab discoveries into clinical trials, STEM CELLS Translational Medicine will help move applications of these critical investigations closer to accepted best patient practices and ultimately improve outcomes. The journal encourages original research articles and concise reviews describing laboratory investigations of stem cells, including their characterization and manipulation, and the translation of their clinical aspects of from the bench to patient care. STEM CELLS Translational Medicine covers all aspects of translational cell studies, including bench research, first-in-human case studies, and relevant clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信