INFLUENCE OF GROOMING ON PERMANENT ARTHROPOD ASSOCIATES OF BIRDS: CATTLE EGRETS, LICE, AND MITES.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PARASITOLOGY
Matthew M Waller, Hannah M Warr, Graham B Goodman, Sarah E Bush, Dale H Clayton
{"title":"INFLUENCE OF GROOMING ON PERMANENT ARTHROPOD ASSOCIATES OF BIRDS: CATTLE EGRETS, LICE, AND MITES.","authors":"Matthew M Waller, Hannah M Warr, Graham B Goodman, Sarah E Bush, Dale H Clayton","doi":"10.1645/23-85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Birds have a diverse community of \"permanent\" arthropods that complete their entire life cycle on the body of the host. Because some of these arthropods are parasites that reduce host fitness, birds control them by grooming, which consists of preening with the beak and scratching with the feet. Although preening is the primary component of grooming, scratching is essential for controlling arthropods on the head and neck, which cannot be preened. Several unrelated groups of birds have evolved comb-like pectinate claws on the middle toenail of each foot. We tested the role of these claws in the control of arthropods by experimentally removing teeth from the claws of captive western cattle egrets (Bubulcus ibis) infested with chewing lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera), feather mites (Acari: Sarcoptiformes), and nasal mites (Acari: Mesostigmata). After a period of 4 mo, we compared the abundance of arthropods on experimental birds to that of control birds with intact teeth. We used video to quantify the grooming rates of the captive birds, which groomed twice as much as wild birds. Experimental and control birds did not differ significantly in grooming time. Both groups virtually eradicated the chewing lice, but not feather mites or nasal mites. We found no support for the hypothesis that pectinate claws increase the efficiency of arthropod control by grooming. Experiments with wild birds are needed to test the hypothesis further under conditions in which birds devote less time to grooming.</p>","PeriodicalId":16659,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parasitology","volume":"110 2","pages":"143-149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1645/23-85","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Birds have a diverse community of "permanent" arthropods that complete their entire life cycle on the body of the host. Because some of these arthropods are parasites that reduce host fitness, birds control them by grooming, which consists of preening with the beak and scratching with the feet. Although preening is the primary component of grooming, scratching is essential for controlling arthropods on the head and neck, which cannot be preened. Several unrelated groups of birds have evolved comb-like pectinate claws on the middle toenail of each foot. We tested the role of these claws in the control of arthropods by experimentally removing teeth from the claws of captive western cattle egrets (Bubulcus ibis) infested with chewing lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera), feather mites (Acari: Sarcoptiformes), and nasal mites (Acari: Mesostigmata). After a period of 4 mo, we compared the abundance of arthropods on experimental birds to that of control birds with intact teeth. We used video to quantify the grooming rates of the captive birds, which groomed twice as much as wild birds. Experimental and control birds did not differ significantly in grooming time. Both groups virtually eradicated the chewing lice, but not feather mites or nasal mites. We found no support for the hypothesis that pectinate claws increase the efficiency of arthropod control by grooming. Experiments with wild birds are needed to test the hypothesis further under conditions in which birds devote less time to grooming.

梳理对鸟类永久性节肢动物伙伴的影响:牛鹭、虱子和螨虫。
鸟类的 "永久性 "节肢动物群落种类繁多,它们在宿主身体上完成整个生命周期。由于其中一些节肢动物是寄生虫,会降低宿主的健康状况,因此鸟类通过梳理来控制它们,梳理包括用喙捕食和用脚抓挠。虽然捕食是梳理的主要部分,但抓挠对于控制头部和颈部的节肢动物也是必不可少的,因为头部和颈部是无法捕食的。有几个不相关的鸟类类群在每只脚的中间趾甲上进化出了梳状的栉状爪。我们通过实验从被咀嚼虱(昆虫纲:Phthiraptera)、羽螨(蛔虫纲:Sarcoptiformes)和鼻螨(蛔虫纲:Mesostigmata)侵扰的人工饲养的西部牛鹭(Bubulcus ibis)的爪子上去除牙齿,从而测试这些爪子在控制节肢动物方面的作用。4 个月后,我们比较了实验鸟与牙齿完好的对照鸟身上节肢动物的数量。我们用视频量化了人工饲养鸟类的梳理率,它们的梳理量是野生鸟类的两倍。实验鸟和对照鸟在梳理时间上没有明显差异。两组鸟几乎都消灭了嚼虱,但没有消灭羽螨或鼻螨。我们没有发现栉状爪能通过梳理提高节肢动物控制效率的假设得到支持。我们需要用野生鸟类进行实验,在鸟类梳理时间较少的条件下进一步验证这一假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Parasitology
Journal of Parasitology 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
60
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Parasitology is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Society of Parasitologists (ASP). The journal publishes original research covering helminths, protozoa, and other parasitic organisms and serves scientific professionals in microbiology, immunology, veterinary science, pathology, and public health. Journal content includes original research articles, brief research notes, announcements of the Society, and book reviews. Articles are subdivided by topic for ease of reference and range from behavior and pathogenesis to systematics and epidemiology. The journal is published continuously online with one full volume printed at the end of each year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信