Development and validation of the patient-reported outcome for older people living with HIV/AIDS in China (PROHIV-OLD).

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rui Zhou, Ying-Jing Zheng, Bei-Jia Wang, Donald L Patrick, Todd C Edwards, Jing-Yi Yun, Jie Zhou, Ren-Jun Gu, Bing-Hui Miao, Hong-Mei Wang
{"title":"Development and validation of the patient-reported outcome for older people living with HIV/AIDS in China (PROHIV-OLD).","authors":"Rui Zhou, Ying-Jing Zheng, Bei-Jia Wang, Donald L Patrick, Todd C Edwards, Jing-Yi Yun, Jie Zhou, Ren-Jun Gu, Bing-Hui Miao, Hong-Mei Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12955-024-02243-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The involvement of quality of life as the UNAIDS fourth 90 target to monitor the global HIV response highlighted the development of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures to help address the holistic needs of people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) beyond viral suppression. This study developed and tested preliminary measurement properties of a new patient-reported outcome (PROHIV-OLD) measure designed specifically to capture influences of HIV on patients aged 50 and older in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-three older people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) were interviewed to solicit items and two rounds of patient cognitive interviews were conducted to modify the content and wording of the initial items. A validation study was then conducted to refine the initial instrument and evaluate measurement properties. Patients were recruited between February 2021 and November 2021, and followed six months later after the first investigation. Classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) were used to select items using the baseline data. The follow-up data were used to evaluate the measurement properties of the final instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 600 patients were recruited at the baseline. Of the 485 patients who completed the follow-up investigation, 483 were included in the validation sample. The final scale of PROHIV-OLD contained 25 items describing five dimensions (physical symptoms, mental status, illness perception, family relationship, and treatment). All the PROHIV-OLD dimensions had satisfactory reliability with Cronbach's alpha coefficient, McDonald's ω, and composite reliability of each dimension being all higher than 0.85. Most dimensions met the test-retest reliability standard except for the physical symptoms dimension (ICC = 0.64). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the structural validity of the final scale, and the model fit index satisfied the criterion. The correlations between dimensions of PROHIV-OLD and MOS-HIV met hypotheses in general. Significant differences on scores of the PROHIV-OLD were found between demographic and clinical subgroups, supporting known-groups validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PROHIV-OLD was found to have good feasibility, reliability and validity for evaluating health outcome of Chinese older PLWHA. Other measurement properties such as responsiveness and interpretability will be further examined.</p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":"22 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10986109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-024-02243-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The involvement of quality of life as the UNAIDS fourth 90 target to monitor the global HIV response highlighted the development of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures to help address the holistic needs of people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) beyond viral suppression. This study developed and tested preliminary measurement properties of a new patient-reported outcome (PROHIV-OLD) measure designed specifically to capture influences of HIV on patients aged 50 and older in China.

Methods: Ninety-three older people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) were interviewed to solicit items and two rounds of patient cognitive interviews were conducted to modify the content and wording of the initial items. A validation study was then conducted to refine the initial instrument and evaluate measurement properties. Patients were recruited between February 2021 and November 2021, and followed six months later after the first investigation. Classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) were used to select items using the baseline data. The follow-up data were used to evaluate the measurement properties of the final instrument.

Results: A total of 600 patients were recruited at the baseline. Of the 485 patients who completed the follow-up investigation, 483 were included in the validation sample. The final scale of PROHIV-OLD contained 25 items describing five dimensions (physical symptoms, mental status, illness perception, family relationship, and treatment). All the PROHIV-OLD dimensions had satisfactory reliability with Cronbach's alpha coefficient, McDonald's ω, and composite reliability of each dimension being all higher than 0.85. Most dimensions met the test-retest reliability standard except for the physical symptoms dimension (ICC = 0.64). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the structural validity of the final scale, and the model fit index satisfied the criterion. The correlations between dimensions of PROHIV-OLD and MOS-HIV met hypotheses in general. Significant differences on scores of the PROHIV-OLD were found between demographic and clinical subgroups, supporting known-groups validity.

Conclusions: The PROHIV-OLD was found to have good feasibility, reliability and validity for evaluating health outcome of Chinese older PLWHA. Other measurement properties such as responsiveness and interpretability will be further examined.

中国老年艾滋病患者报告结果(PROHIV-OLD)的开发与验证。
背景:联合国艾滋病规划署(UNAIDS)将生活质量作为监测全球艾滋病防治工作的第四个90目标,这凸显了患者报告结果(PRO)测量方法的发展,有助于满足艾滋病病毒感染者/艾滋病患者(PLWHA)在病毒抑制之外的整体需求。本研究开发并测试了一种新的患者报告结果(PROHIV-OLD)测量方法的初步测量特性,该方法专门用于捕捉 HIV 对中国 50 岁及以上患者的影响:方法:对 93 名老年艾滋病感染者(PLWHA)进行了访谈,以征集项目,并进行了两轮患者认知访谈,以修改初始项目的内容和措辞。随后进行了验证研究,以完善初始工具并评估测量特性。在 2021 年 2 月至 2021 年 11 月期间招募了患者,并在第一次调查后的六个月后对患者进行了随访。利用基线数据,采用经典测验理论(CTT)和项目反应理论(IRT)来选择项目。随访数据用于评估最终工具的测量属性:基线调查共招募了 600 名患者。在完成随访调查的 485 名患者中,有 483 人被纳入验证样本。PROHIV-OLD 的最终量表包含 25 个项目,分别描述五个维度(身体症状、精神状态、疾病认知、家庭关系和治疗)。PROHIV-OLD 所有维度的信度均令人满意,各维度的 Cronbach's α 系数、McDonald's ω 和综合信度均高于 0.85。除躯体症状维度(ICC = 0.64)外,大多数维度都达到了测试-重测信度标准。确认性因子分析支持最终量表的结构效度,模型拟合指数符合标准。PROHIV-OLD 和 MOS-HIV 各维度之间的相关性总体上符合假设。PROHIV-OLD的得分在人口学和临床亚组之间存在显著差异,支持已知组的有效性:结论:PROHIV-OLD 在评估中国老年 PLWHA 健康状况方面具有良好的可行性、可靠性和有效性。其他测量特性,如反应性和可解释性等,还有待于进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信