Rhinoplasty Health Inventory and Nasal Outcomes (RHINO) Scale: Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation for Hebrew-Speaking Patients.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Facial Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2297-4494
Netanel Eisenbach, Matti Mizrachi, Amiel A Dror, Rania Faris, Tali Jane Ohayon, Ohad Ronen, Eyal Sela
{"title":"Rhinoplasty Health Inventory and Nasal Outcomes (RHINO) Scale: Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation for Hebrew-Speaking Patients.","authors":"Netanel Eisenbach, Matti Mizrachi, Amiel A Dror, Rania Faris, Tali Jane Ohayon, Ohad Ronen, Eyal Sela","doi":"10.1055/a-2297-4494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient-reported outcomes questionnaires are accepted measurement tools to evaluate procedures results. The Rhinoplasty Health Inventory and Nasal Outcomes (RHINO) scale is an English-language validated and reliable quality-of-life instrument that evaluates both functional and aesthetic outcomes after rhinoplasty, and is not available in Hebrew. We followed the forward-and-back-translation method, defined by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Translation of the RHINO scale and merging it into one version were performed, following back-translation and validation on native Hebrew-speaking patients who underwent rhinoplasty and control healthy group. Lastly, we review and analyzed the results. The translated questionnaire had high reliability measures, demonstrating homogeneity (α value 0.800 in the rhinoplasty group and 0.896 in the control group), test-retest reproducibility with no significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.5), and high agreement scores represented by the Bland-Altman plot (95% limits of agreement ranged from 8.78 to 9.80). Validity demonstrated by significant differences between the two study groups' mean questionnaire scores (<i>p</i> < 0.001 for rhinoplasty vs. controls, <i>p</i> < 0.001 for preoperative vs. postoperative, and <i>p</i> = 0.002 for postoperative vs. control group) and also between the aesthetic scores and functional scores of the rhinoplasty group before and after the surgery (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There were no reported understanding problems. The Hebrew version of the RHINO scale is a reliable and valid tool for pre- and post-rhinoplasty surgery outcomes measuring among Hebrew-speaking patients, and can improve coordination of expectations, follow-up, and quantify subjective evaluation of the surgery. Level of evidence: IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":12195,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"277-285"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2297-4494","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes questionnaires are accepted measurement tools to evaluate procedures results. The Rhinoplasty Health Inventory and Nasal Outcomes (RHINO) scale is an English-language validated and reliable quality-of-life instrument that evaluates both functional and aesthetic outcomes after rhinoplasty, and is not available in Hebrew. We followed the forward-and-back-translation method, defined by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Translation of the RHINO scale and merging it into one version were performed, following back-translation and validation on native Hebrew-speaking patients who underwent rhinoplasty and control healthy group. Lastly, we review and analyzed the results. The translated questionnaire had high reliability measures, demonstrating homogeneity (α value 0.800 in the rhinoplasty group and 0.896 in the control group), test-retest reproducibility with no significant difference (p = 0.5), and high agreement scores represented by the Bland-Altman plot (95% limits of agreement ranged from 8.78 to 9.80). Validity demonstrated by significant differences between the two study groups' mean questionnaire scores (p < 0.001 for rhinoplasty vs. controls, p < 0.001 for preoperative vs. postoperative, and p = 0.002 for postoperative vs. control group) and also between the aesthetic scores and functional scores of the rhinoplasty group before and after the surgery (p < 0.001). There were no reported understanding problems. The Hebrew version of the RHINO scale is a reliable and valid tool for pre- and post-rhinoplasty surgery outcomes measuring among Hebrew-speaking patients, and can improve coordination of expectations, follow-up, and quantify subjective evaluation of the surgery. Level of evidence: IV.

鼻整形健康量表和鼻腔结果量表(RHINO):针对希伯来语患者的翻译、跨文化适应和验证。
背景:患者报告结果问卷是评估手术结果的公认测量工具。鼻整形术健康量表和鼻部结果量表(RHINO)是一种经过验证的可靠的生活质量英语工具,可评估鼻整形术后的功能和美学效果,但希伯来语量表尚未问世:我们采用了欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织(EORTC)规定的正向和反向翻译法。翻译 RHINO 量表并将其合并为一个版本,然后进行回译,并在以希伯来语为母语的鼻整形手术患者和健康对照组中进行验证。最后,我们对结果进行了回顾和分析:翻译后的问卷具有很高的可靠性,显示出同质性(鼻整形手术组的α值为 0.800,对照组的α值为 0.896),重复测试的再现性没有显著差异(P = 0.5),布兰-阿尔特曼图(Bland-Altman plot)显示出很高的一致性(95% 的一致性范围在 8.78 到 9.80 之间)。有效性体现在两个研究组的平均问卷得分之间存在显著差异(鼻整形组与对照组相比,P < 0.001;术前组与术后组相比,P < 0.001;术后组与对照组相比,P = 0.002),而且鼻整形组的美学得分和功能得分在手术前后也存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。没有关于理解问题的报告。结论:希伯来语版 RHINO 量表是测量希伯来语患者鼻整形手术前后效果的可靠有效的工具,可以改善预期协调、随访和量化对手术的主观评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Facial Plastic Surgery
Facial Plastic Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Facial Plastic Surgery is a journal that publishes topic-specific issues covering areas of aesthetic and reconstructive plastic surgery as it relates to the head, neck, and face. The journal''s scope includes issues devoted to scar revision, periorbital and mid-face rejuvenation, facial trauma, facial implants, rhinoplasty, neck reconstruction, cleft palate, face lifts, as well as various other emerging minimally invasive procedures. Authors provide a global perspective on each topic, critically evaluate recent works in the field, and apply it to clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信