Comparison of the Efficacy Between the Dual Therapy of Tegoprazan and the Quadruple Therapy of Tegoprazan: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Han-Ning Liu, Rui Wang, Yan Cao, Feng Xian, Xian-Jin Bi, Ding-Jian Wu, Bin Wang, Xing-Wei Wang, Chun-Hui Lan
{"title":"Comparison of the Efficacy Between the Dual Therapy of Tegoprazan and the Quadruple Therapy of Tegoprazan: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Study.","authors":"Han-Ning Liu, Rui Wang, Yan Cao, Feng Xian, Xian-Jin Bi, Ding-Jian Wu, Bin Wang, Xing-Wei Wang, Chun-Hui Lan","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tegoprazan (TPZ), a potassium-competitive acid blocker, exerts a strong acid-suppression effect and a rapid onset of action. However, research on TPZ-amoxicillin (TA) dual treatment is limited. Here, we compared the safety and efficacy of TPZ-amoxicillin dual treatment and TPZ, bismuth potassium citrate, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin (TBAC) quadruple therapy in patients newly diagnosed with H. pylori infection over a 14-day treatment period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 236 patients newly diagnosed with H. pylori were enrolled in this multicenter, prospective, open-label, and randomized controlled study. Patients randomly received either TA dual or TBAC quadruple therapy. The incidence of adverse reactions and treatment compliance were recorded and then analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intention-to-treat analysis revealed that H. pylori eradication rates were 83.9% (95% confidence interval 78.2%-91.3%) and 81.4% (95% confidence interval 74.2%-88.5%) for the TA and TBAC groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between them ( P = 0.606). The per-protocol analysis revealed that the H. pylori eradication rates were 88.3% and 84.8% for the TA and TBAC groups, respectively ( P = 0.447). The incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower in the TA group than in the TBAC group (4.2% vs 15.3%, P = 0.004). Moreover, the TA group demonstrated substantially higher treatment compliance than the TBAC group (94.1% vs 89.0%, P = 0.020).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The TA dual therapy successfully eradicated H. pylori with a high eradication rate and a low incidence of adverse reactions. Therefore, this treatment is recommended as an alternative course for patients newly diagnosed with H. pylori infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"e1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500782/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000699","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Tegoprazan (TPZ), a potassium-competitive acid blocker, exerts a strong acid-suppression effect and a rapid onset of action. However, research on TPZ-amoxicillin (TA) dual treatment is limited. Here, we compared the safety and efficacy of TPZ-amoxicillin dual treatment and TPZ, bismuth potassium citrate, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin (TBAC) quadruple therapy in patients newly diagnosed with H. pylori infection over a 14-day treatment period.

Methods: A total of 236 patients newly diagnosed with H. pylori were enrolled in this multicenter, prospective, open-label, and randomized controlled study. Patients randomly received either TA dual or TBAC quadruple therapy. The incidence of adverse reactions and treatment compliance were recorded and then analyzed.

Results: The intention-to-treat analysis revealed that H. pylori eradication rates were 83.9% (95% confidence interval 78.2%-91.3%) and 81.4% (95% confidence interval 74.2%-88.5%) for the TA and TBAC groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between them ( P = 0.606). The per-protocol analysis revealed that the H. pylori eradication rates were 88.3% and 84.8% for the TA and TBAC groups, respectively ( P = 0.447). The incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower in the TA group than in the TBAC group (4.2% vs 15.3%, P = 0.004). Moreover, the TA group demonstrated substantially higher treatment compliance than the TBAC group (94.1% vs 89.0%, P = 0.020).

Discussion: The TA dual therapy successfully eradicated H. pylori with a high eradication rate and a low incidence of adverse reactions. Therefore, this treatment is recommended as an alternative course for patients newly diagnosed with H. pylori infection.

特戈普拉赞双重疗法与特戈普拉赞四重疗法的疗效比较:一项随机对照多中心研究。
简介替戈普拉赞(Tegoprazan,TPZ)是一种钾竞争性酸阻滞剂,具有很强的抑酸作用,而且起效迅速。然而,有关 TPZ-阿莫西林(TA)双重治疗的研究还很有限。在此,我们比较了TPZ-阿莫西林双重治疗与TPZ、枸橼酸铋钾、阿莫西林和克拉霉素(TBAC)四联疗法在新诊断的幽门螺杆菌感染患者中14天治疗期的安全性和有效性:这项多中心、前瞻性、开放标签和随机对照研究共招募了 236 名新确诊的幽门螺杆菌感染患者。患者随机接受 TA 双联疗法或 TBAC 四联疗法。研究记录并分析了不良反应发生率和治疗依从性:意向治疗分析显示,TA组和TBAC组的幽门螺杆菌根除率分别为83.9%(95%置信区间[CI] 78.2%-91.3%)和81.4%(95%置信区间[CI] 74.2%-88.5%),差异无统计学意义(P = 0.606)。按协议分析显示,TA组和TBAC组的幽门螺杆菌根除率分别为88.3%和84.8%(P = 0.447)。TA组的不良反应发生率明显低于TBAC组(4.2% vs. 15.3%,P = 0.004)。此外,TA组的治疗依从性大大高于TBAC组(94.1% vs. 89.0%,P = 0.020):TA双重疗法成功根除了幽门螺杆菌,根除率高,不良反应发生率低。因此,建议将该疗法作为新诊断幽门螺杆菌感染患者的替代疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology (CTG), published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), is a peer-reviewed open access online journal dedicated to innovative clinical work in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. CTG hopes to fulfill an unmet need for clinicians and scientists by welcoming novel cohort studies, early-phase clinical trials, qualitative and quantitative epidemiologic research, hypothesis-generating research, studies of novel mechanisms and methodologies including public health interventions, and integration of approaches across organs and disciplines. CTG also welcomes hypothesis-generating small studies, methods papers, and translational research with clear applications to human physiology or disease. Colon and small bowel Endoscopy and novel diagnostics Esophagus Functional GI disorders Immunology of the GI tract Microbiology of the GI tract Inflammatory bowel disease Pancreas and biliary tract Liver Pathology Pediatrics Preventative medicine Nutrition/obesity Stomach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信